Spanning our corporate, intellectual property and litigation practices, our legal team helps biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies — both public and private, large and small —
solve their legal problems at every stage of growth.
Entrepreneurs, non-profit groups, legal aid agencies, and courts are developing legal software applications to serve consumers directly as a alternative way of
solving their legal problems at low cost.
Not exact matches
A recent report by the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, chaired by Supreme Court of Canada Justice Thomas A. Cromwell, stated nearly 12 million Canadians will experience
at least one
legal problem in a three - year period, and few will have the resources to
solve them.
First articulated forty years ago by Marjorie Rombauer in her text
Legal Problem Solving, 103 this four - step research process was adapted slightly by Joseph Kimble and F. Georgeann Wing for use
at Thomas Cooley Law School: 104
If you share our perspective that the business of law can be better... if you recognize that yesterday's thinking won't
solve tomorrow's
problems... if you're passionate about finding better approaches to the most serious challenges facing the
legal community... then get in touch
at [email protected] and get to know Apogee as we transform the business of law through practical application of artificial intelligence.
This redistribution of information accessibility may not only
solve some of the
problems facing the
legal industry, but also has the capability to improve society
at large.
The course is aimed
at introducing law students to the changing
legal landscape and helping them understand how technology can be applied to law by teaching basic technology skills, showcasing available
legal technologies and developing technical
problem -
solving abilities.
The «cost of
legal services»
problem solved by LAO LAW for LAO, is a smaller version of, but exactly the same
problem as, the majority of the population can not obtain
legal services
at reasonable cost.
All efforts are aimed
at helping the population learn to live with the
problem of unaffordable
legal services, but there are none to
solve the
problem.
Be grateful that you can still impress some people
at parties, you can afford to pay the mortgage in your house in the suburbs and that on occasion, you can sit back and say to yourself that you helped
solve someone's
legal problem and felt good about it.
Recent graduate Andrea Sager is applying her traditional
legal knowledge, Lunsford Academy training in multi-discipline
problem -
solving, and networking abilities
at a large Cincinnati law firm and with her own clothing line business.
I learned about the importance of medical -
legal partnerships, where lawyers can be part of the team
at VA medical facilities and I have learned that when lawyers are on the team they can often help
solve the underlying
problem that brings the veteran to the facility, such as homelessness and without the exposure on the street the veteran has a place to live, often they don't need to come to the medical facility as often.
(3) The unavailability of
legal services to a large majority of the population
at reasonable cost has been a serious
problem for decades and is getting worse, which shows that law societies are not able to
solve the
problem.
Until the
problem of «the unavailability to the majority of the population of
legal services
at reasonable cost» is
solved, the prosecutors of this offence should be Crown counsel, or
at the least such prosecutions should require approval by Crown counsel.
With 3 offices in Beijing, Shanghai and Shenzhen, and approximately 300
legal professionals, the firm dedicates itself to providing solutions
at the highest international standard and
solving the clients» most demanding
problems in a cost - effective way.
Until the
problem of «the unavailability to the majority of the population of
legal services
at reasonable cost» is
solved, the prosecutors of this offence should be Crown counsel, or
at the least such prosecutions... [more]
My «Conclusion» states: «To argue persuasively that a law society in Canada should be the single regulator of all providers of
legal services requires that, that law society
solve the
problem as to
legal services not being available to the population
at reasonable cost.
But if they take on the power to regulate other professions without having
solved the
problem, when the government steps in to again make
legal services available
at reasonable cost, the arguments in favour of removing self - regulation will be much stronger.
With human centered design
at the core of our design process, we rely on the subject matter expertise of attorneys and
legal operations professionals to design user experiences that
solve real
problems.
We discussed the new Relativity Ecosystem, interoperability trends focusing on tools that
solve business
problems, and the buzz about creating apps for
legal technology software
at kCura's annual user conference, Relativity Fest.
At each school, the semester - long Neota - based course enabled the students to analyze real - world
legal problems and build technical systems to
solve those
problems on an ongoing basis.
We want to use technology to help our
legal professionals and
at the same time pave the way to help people
at large to
solve their
legal problems.
Inspired by Lon Fuller, who, in Rod Macdonald's words, «saw law as a human project, a human accomplishment, and a human aspiration that emerges from ongoing patterns of human interaction and the reciprocal adjustment of human expectation,» he conceived
legal education as being,
at its core, learning how «to attend to the complexities of human beings in interaction with each other,» stating that we should teach how law could be «a facilitator of human interaction» and «about finding social outcomes that help
solve human
problems [rather than] perfecting abstract concepts to
solve legal puzzles.»
Blame law societies for the unaffordable
legal services
problem because: (1) everything they do in regard to the
problem is aimed
at helping the public get used to living with the
problem, such as promoting «alternative
legal services,» but nothing is done to try to
solve the
problem; and, (2) law societies do not sponsor the innovations necessary to make
legal services affordable again.
I think Elevate has
solved that
problem with Cael LPM,» said Ron Friedmann,
legal project management expert and consultant
at Fireman & Company.
But, ILSP proponents argue, not all
legal problems need to be
solved with the assistance of an expensive lawyer billing
at an hourly rate.
While
at Berkeley he began to come around to the view that family courts are often required to
solve problems which fundamentally are not
legal but social.
Recently recognized by the ABA as a
Legal Rebel, Michele is a Professor
at the University of Miami and the founder of LawWithoutWalls, a multi-disciplinary, international think - tank of over 1000 lawyers, business professionals, entrepreneurs, and law and business students who collaborate to
solve problems and create innovations
at the intersection of law, business, and technology.
211 Carnegie Report, supra note 8,
at 95 (citing Stuckey et al., supra note 1,
at 109)(««Students can not become effective
legal problem - solvers unless they have opportunities to engage in
problem -
solving activities in hypothetical or real
legal contexts..»»)
With a global family of employees made up of industry experts and people with experience working
at law firms and major corporations, TLS represents a vast network of resource roven success in solutions engineering,
problem solving, and delivering
legal support services that clients can trust — anywhere in the world.
Since its inception, the team
at Advanced
Legal has been driven to not only
solve technical
problems, but embrace each opportunity to help clients and colleagues work more efficiently using technology.
«During my fellowship, I look forward to implementing and expanding upon the technology and
problem -
solving skills I developed in the Law Clinic
at Loyola University New Orleans and as a Graduate for Justice
at Southeast Louisiana
Legal Services.
Call the trusted lawyers
at Allen Wellman McNew Harvey, LLP, for diligent representation to
solve your
legal problems.
An adjunct professor
at Vanderbilt Law School, Cat co-teaches
legal project management with Larry Bridgesmith and teaches Legal Problem Solving, which applies human - centered design thinking to both the practice and business of
legal project management with Larry Bridgesmith and teaches
Legal Problem Solving, which applies human - centered design thinking to both the practice and business of
Legal Problem Solving, which applies human - centered design thinking to both the practice and business of law.
Even if you have taken steps to
solve the
problem yourself, you can talk with a lawyer
at any step in the
legal process.
First,
solve the
problem that the majority of the population can not obtain
legal services
at reasonable cost.
Ken you say, «instead of offering the residents of Canada alternative
legal services, its law societies should be trying to
solve the unaffordable
legal services
problem, i.e., that the majority of the population can not obtain
legal services
at reasonable cost.»
I've written several articles having the theme that instead of offering the residents of Canada alternative
legal services, its law societies should be trying to
solve the unaffordable
legal services
problem, i.e., that the majority of the population can not obtain
legal services
at reasonable cost.
wouldn't tell the public that the
problem is not the Law Society's
problem, as in effect it does; (15) LSUC's website wouldn't state that lay benchers «represent the public interest,» which is impossible now that we are well beyond the 19th century; (16) CanLII's services would be upgraded in kind and volume to be a true support service, able to have a substantial impact upon the
problem, and several other developed support services, all provided
at cost, would together, provide a complete solution; (17) LSUC's management would not be part - time management by amateurs - amateurs because benchers don't have the expertise to
solve the
problem, nor are they trying to get it, nor are they joining with Canada's other law societies to
solve this national
problem; (18) the Federation of Law Societies of Canada would not describe the
problem as being one of mere «gaps in access to
legal services» (see its Sept. 2012 text, «Inventory of Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada» (1st paragraph), (19) LSUC would not be encouraging the use alternatives to lawyers, such as law students, self - help, and «unbundled, targeted» legal services, as a «cutting costs by cutting competence» strategy; and, (20) it would not be necessary to impose an Ontario version of the Clementi Report (UK, 2004) that would separate LSUC's regulatory functions from its representative functions, to be exercised by separate authori
legal services» (see its Sept. 2012 text, «Inventory of Access to
Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada» (1st paragraph), (19) LSUC would not be encouraging the use alternatives to lawyers, such as law students, self - help, and «unbundled, targeted» legal services, as a «cutting costs by cutting competence» strategy; and, (20) it would not be necessary to impose an Ontario version of the Clementi Report (UK, 2004) that would separate LSUC's regulatory functions from its representative functions, to be exercised by separate authori
Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada» (1st paragraph), (19) LSUC would not be encouraging the use alternatives to lawyers, such as law students, self - help, and «unbundled, targeted»
legal services, as a «cutting costs by cutting competence» strategy; and, (20) it would not be necessary to impose an Ontario version of the Clementi Report (UK, 2004) that would separate LSUC's regulatory functions from its representative functions, to be exercised by separate authori
legal services, as a «cutting costs by cutting competence» strategy; and, (20) it would not be necessary to impose an Ontario version of the Clementi Report (UK, 2004) that would separate LSUC's regulatory functions from its representative functions, to be exercised by separate authorities.
Both solutions will occur because the power of the news media and of the internet, interacting, will quickly make widely known these types of information, the cumulative effect of which will force governments and the courts to act: (1) the situations of the thousands of people whose lives have been ruined because they could not obtain the help of a lawyer; (2) the statistics as to the increasing percentages of litigants who are unrepresented and clogging the courts, causing judges to provide more public warnings; (3) the large fees that some lawyers charge; (4) increasing numbers of people being denied
Legal Aid and court - appointed lawyers; (5) the many years that law societies have been unsuccessful in coping with this problem which continues to grow worse; (6) people prosecuted for «the unauthorized practice of law» because they tried to help others desperately in need of a lawyer whom they couldn't afford to hire; (7) that there is no truly effective advertising creating competition among law firms that could cause them to lower their fees; (8) that law societies are too comfortably protected by their monopoly over the provision of legal services, which is why they might block the expansion of the paralegal profession, and haven't effectively innovated with electronic technology and new infrastructure so as to be able to solve this problem; (9) that when members of the public access the law society website they don't see any reference to the problem that can assure them that something effective is being done and, (10) in order for the rule of law, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the whole of Canada's constitution be able to operate effectively and command sufficient respect, the majority of the population must be able to obtain a lawyer at reasonable
Legal Aid and court - appointed lawyers; (5) the many years that law societies have been unsuccessful in coping with this
problem which continues to grow worse; (6) people prosecuted for «the unauthorized practice of law» because they tried to help others desperately in need of a lawyer whom they couldn't afford to hire; (7) that there is no truly effective advertising creating competition among law firms that could cause them to lower their fees; (8) that law societies are too comfortably protected by their monopoly over the provision of
legal services, which is why they might block the expansion of the paralegal profession, and haven't effectively innovated with electronic technology and new infrastructure so as to be able to solve this problem; (9) that when members of the public access the law society website they don't see any reference to the problem that can assure them that something effective is being done and, (10) in order for the rule of law, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the whole of Canada's constitution be able to operate effectively and command sufficient respect, the majority of the population must be able to obtain a lawyer at reasonable
legal services, which is why they might block the expansion of the paralegal profession, and haven't effectively innovated with electronic technology and new infrastructure so as to be able to
solve this
problem; (9) that when members of the public access the law society website they don't see any reference to the
problem that can assure them that something effective is being done and, (10) in order for the rule of law, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the whole of Canada's constitution be able to operate effectively and command sufficient respect, the majority of the population must be able to obtain a lawyer
at reasonable cost.
The independence of Canada's law societies from government intervention has meant that their performance shows that they can not
solve the
problem, which is, «the majority of the population can not obtain
legal services
at reasonable cost.»
Our self - governing status
at risk; see: «Alternative Business Structures Proposals or
Solving the Unaffordable
Legal Services
Problem,» on the, «Access to Justice in Canada» blog, March 6, 2015: http://accesstojusticeincanada.blogspot.ca/
They just want their
legal problems solved at a price they can afford.
Fred pointed
at document review and online interaction with clients as the top two
legal industry
problems that tech could
solve.
This same technology can create several other support services, which together, would
solve «the unaffordable
legal services
problem»: the majority of population can not obtain
legal services
at reasonable cost.
Nearly 12 million Canadians will experience
at least one
legal problem in a given three - year period, yet few will have the resources to
solve them.
Bill Henderson, a noted law professor with his hand squarely on the
legal industry's pulse, put an even finer gloss on Casey's thesis: «' The lawyer theory of value» —
solving legal problems one
at a time with smart lawyers — is an unstated and unexamined preference of lawyers, not a viable long - term solution for the clients they serve.»
• Works together with clients to design new approaches to
legal services delivery; •
Solves problems at the intersection of business, law, technology, and other disciplines that require all - star expertise and collaboration skills; • Engages our lawyers, students, and professional staff; • Broadens talent and recruiting opportunities; and • Creates immersive learning experiences that foster new skills lawyers need to help clients be more successful.
Otherwise the
problem that the majority of the population can not obtain
legal services
at reasonable cost will never be
solved.
Law librarian and colleague Susan Barker
at the Bora Laskin Law Library has let me know that the new 5th edition of
Legal Problem Solving — Reasoning, Research & Writing (LexisNexis Canada) is now out.