Sentences with phrase «solve their legal problems by»

Because of the forces that are greatly increasing the volume of laws and their complexity, people are progressively less able to solve their legal problems by themselves, and are forced to accept law society programs that «cut costs by cutting competence» (e.g., law students, paralegals, self - help, and «unbundling» of legal services).

Not exact matches

Where appropriate, he invites clients to take a step back from the legal issues in front of them and invites them to ask themselves better questions by using the Osborne - Parnes Creative Problem Solving methodology.

The church can solve this problem by a «render unto Caesar» approach by relinquishing the legal role that the state has lumbered it with, and gets back to the basics of celebrating who God puts together — which, as stated in the previous verse, was between a man and woman instinct-wise.

And the administration hopes to have solved the multimillion - dollar problem of commercial tax refunds by that point — though many expect legal challenges to stall that deal.

«Many ethical and social problems are not solved by experts in a single discipline alone,» said Joy Boyer, senior program analyst in NHGRI's Ethical, Legal and Social Implications Research Program.

However, the sound advice and deft legal drafting skills of an experienced real estate attorney may pay for themselves several times over by solving problems before they ever arise.

Two decades of debate over assigning blame for emissions, legal responsibility for reducing them and allocating per capita rights to use the atmosphere for disposing of heat trapping gases have created a zero - sum game without opportunities for solving problems by creating mutual gains.

In the legal world, the next problem the alarmists have to solve is to get the US Supreme Court to make all the legal «let's pretends» concerning the CPP «legal» by declaring them to be so.

«A new study by LawGeex pitted 20 experienced lawyers against the LawGeex AI, which was designed to solve legal problems.

And therefore devices such as the following are used by law societies: (1) methods to control an alleged over-supply of lawyers; (2) «alternative legal services,» which are charity, simplistic services, and without the benefit of the solicitor - client relationship (pro bono services being but a very small exception, and possibly targeted legal services); and, (3) the sponsoring of «apps,» (the application of electronic technology to legal services), the effect of which upon the problem is unknown and unanalyzed, and can not solve any such access to justice problem.

A recent report by the Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, chaired by Supreme Court of Canada Justice Thomas A. Cromwell, stated nearly 12 million Canadians will experience at least one legal problem in a three - year period, and few will have the resources to solve them.

(A problem that could easily be solved for legal proceedings by amending subsections such as, s. 31.5 CEA and s. 34.1 (8) OEA, and s. 41.6 of the Alberta Evidence Act (AEA), to state that «systems integrity» can be established by proof of compliance with 72.34.)

For further details see (pdf downloads): (1) «Access to Justice — Unaffordable Legal Services» Concepts and Solutions»; (2) «The Technology of Centralized Legal Research Can Solve the Unaffordable Legal Services Problem»; (3) «Access to Justice — Canada's Unaffordable Legal Services — CanLII as the Necessary Support Service»; (4) «A2J: Preventing the Abolition of Law Societies by Curing the Defects in their Management Structure: A Solution to the Unaffordable Legal Services Problem»; (5) «A2J: «Let Them Eat Cake,» So Let Them Use Alternative Legal Services»; (6) Indexing; (7) Sometimes Laws are Too Important to be Left to Lawyers — Lawyers Without Technical Support,» (Slaw January 28, 2016), and other access to justice (A2J) articles on my SSRN author's page, and Slaw author's page.

Given: (1) the misery and damage caused to the majority of the population by the problem; and, (2) the law societies» refusal to try to solve the problem, the commercial producers have a strong argument that they should be treated as equal to the ABSs in providing relief from the consequences of the law societies» breach of trust, i.e., their failure to perform the duties attendant to their monopoly over the provision of legal services.

But that problem can not be solved by turning ownership of the legal profession over to investment houses.

(1) management by part - time amateurs (benchers), whose work is mostly charity — «amateurs» because they don't have the expertise necessary for solving difficult problems such as the unaffordability of legal services (and they don't try to get it);

The probability of wrongful convictions is increased by increasing numbers of defendants in the courts without lawyers, which is due to: (a) very poor government funding of legal aid programs; and, (b) law societies» failure to attempt to solve the unaffordable legal services problem — the one aggravates the damage done by the other.

Best Practices for Legal Education, published by the Clinical Legal Education Association fifteen years later, in 2007, essentially reiterated the message of the MacCrate Report.57 Best Practices argued that to become effective practicing lawyers, students must have opportunities during law school to engage in legal problem - solving activities, either in hypothetical situations or real legal contexts.58 The MacCrate Report set out principles law schools should apply to achieve excellence in legal educaLegal Education, published by the Clinical Legal Education Association fifteen years later, in 2007, essentially reiterated the message of the MacCrate Report.57 Best Practices argued that to become effective practicing lawyers, students must have opportunities during law school to engage in legal problem - solving activities, either in hypothetical situations or real legal contexts.58 The MacCrate Report set out principles law schools should apply to achieve excellence in legal educaLegal Education Association fifteen years later, in 2007, essentially reiterated the message of the MacCrate Report.57 Best Practices argued that to become effective practicing lawyers, students must have opportunities during law school to engage in legal problem - solving activities, either in hypothetical situations or real legal contexts.58 The MacCrate Report set out principles law schools should apply to achieve excellence in legal educalegal problem - solving activities, either in hypothetical situations or real legal contexts.58 The MacCrate Report set out principles law schools should apply to achieve excellence in legal educalegal contexts.58 The MacCrate Report set out principles law schools should apply to achieve excellence in legal educalegal education.

First articulated forty years ago by Marjorie Rombauer in her text Legal Problem Solving, 103 this four - step research process was adapted slightly by Joseph Kimble and F. Georgeann Wing for use at Thomas Cooley Law School: 104

As a seasoned attorney, you can help us solve these problems by agreeing to mentor new lawyers who volunteer for pro bono cases through Volunteer Legal Services.

Ending the lawyer monopoly on legal services will not, by itself, solve the access to justice problem in its entirety, but it is an important and necessary element.

The course is aimed at introducing law students to the changing legal landscape and helping them understand how technology can be applied to law by teaching basic technology skills, showcasing available legal technologies and developing technical problem - solving abilities.

By using lawyers to solve legal problems that can cause illness — from fixing faulty furnaces to navigating immigration rules that may make patients afraid to apply for food or housing assistance — doctors believe they can prevent more serious health crises, such as malnutrition, job loss, and domestic violence.»

The «cost of legal services» problem solved by LAO LAW for LAO, is a smaller version of, but exactly the same problem as, the majority of the population can not obtain legal services at reasonable cost.

Alice, I agree entirely that removing lawyers» monopoly on legal services (as, by the way, Ontario has already done with the licensing of paralegals) won't solve all our A2J problems.

But their purpose is to make money by controlling the legal services market, and not to solve social welfare problems such as the unaffordability legal advice services.

A primary purpose of ReInvent Law is to provide a new element of education through research and experimentation on endeavors designed (1) to solve problems faced by the legal profession including access to justice concerns and (2) to create new vehicles for the delivery of legal services.

Melissa Hall is a general practice «primary care» attorney who helps clients navigate the legal system by solving legal problems, helping clients solve their legal problems, or helping them find someone who can.

But the problem is not a legal problem, nor one solved by a more intensive use of previously used solutions, which is what is recommended.

And so, the only way that the problem of unaffordable legal services will be solved is by way of government programs for socialized law.

Until the problem of «the unavailability to the majority of the population of legal services at reasonable cost» is solved, the prosecutors of this offence should be Crown counsel, or at the least such prosecutions should require approval by Crown counsel.

I guess maybe what I'm thinking is that by opening up the window, by learning how to code, learning what's possible, it lets you see a different way of serving clients and solving legal problems, and part of me thinks that, as new possibilities come online, new ways of serving clients by building tools that fix things, like this parking ticket app, like a service that allows lawyers to build a referral network that makes them look more like a giant, spread out firm, and other things, as these possibilities come out there, you can stop thinking about serving just one client's legal needs, and start thinking about solving that legal problem for anyone who comes to you.

When «dear» is an opinion on pricing held by the 80 % of society who do not use a lawyer to solve a legal problem, then we have a challenge and an opportunity.

The SRL has unfortunately become typecast as a disgruntled and, often incorrigible problem to be solved by those within the legal profession.

As a result, many people (and this includes many in the public sector) would rather solve their own legal problems by using Google in a haphazard and dangerous way.

Inspired by Lon Fuller, who, in Rod Macdonald's words, «saw law as a human project, a human accomplishment, and a human aspiration that emerges from ongoing patterns of human interaction and the reciprocal adjustment of human expectation,» he conceived legal education as being, at its core, learning how «to attend to the complexities of human beings in interaction with each other,» stating that we should teach how law could be «a facilitator of human interaction» and «about finding social outcomes that help solve human problems [rather than] perfecting abstract concepts to solve legal puzzles.»

I think they apply whether we're talking about individuals who definitely are under - served by lawyers today, but I think it goes all the way up to the largest clients, too, where there are large corporates that have all these legal needs that aren't being met because it's just not either packaged or priced in a way that works for them to get these problems solved.

Indeed, it is patently unjust to expect that LPP graduates, themselves often in precarious financial positions, will solve this problem by offering affordable legal services that the remainder of the profession has been unwilling to provide until now.

These great successes prove that the «unaffordable legal services problem» can be solved with the power of a collectively as represented by a law society, rather than attempting to do so by way of the very limited powers and resources of individual law firms negotiating with high - powered investors.

We can wow our clients by shifting our mindset when we solve legal problems.

As Artificial Lawyer has remarked several times over the course of this year on seeing pioneers solve new problems using AI systems, the limits of AI in the legal world are mainly set by our imaginations, not the technology.

Then focus ultimate qualification on candidates» ability to actually listen to solve real legal problems encountered by real clients.

Consumers can be easily misled into thinking a document produced by an ILSP through an automated question and answer system solves their legal problem or advances their interests when it does not.

The nonprofit legal aid advice and referral center, available by phone to low - income people throughout Connecticut, helps clients solve their legal problems for free.

Recently recognized by the ABA as a Legal Rebel, Michele is a Professor at the University of Miami and the founder of LawWithoutWalls, a multi-disciplinary, international think - tank of over 1000 lawyers, business professionals, entrepreneurs, and law and business students who collaborate to solve problems and create innovations at the intersection of law, business, and technology.

The restrictions are so severe that the result is to deprive North Carolina's citizens of low cost solutions to solving many legal problems, inhibits innovation in developing legal solutions by an emerging self - help legal software industry, stifles competition to attorneys from self - help legal software publishers in the State of North Carolina, and will eliminate any possibility of private investment in self - help legal software development.

The task is to solve the identified problem by developing a business plan for a legal start - up.

And it wouldn't solve the problem of people who are not barred anywhere, such as the many paralegals who do doc review side by side with licensed lawyers, or the thousands of foreign lawyers who do offshore outsourced legal process work.

In other places where there are already robust law and technology communities by the time a Legal Hackers chapter forms (as was the case in DC), it's really about creating a forum for those existing communities to convene and solve problems together.

That could help the clients have a better life by helping them solve their legal problems.