Sentences with phrase «solve your legal problem how»

During this time, you can ask: How the law applies to your situation How to use the law to solve your legal problem How long the legal work may take How much the lawyer will charge

Not exact matches

No matter how you bill, what types of legal problems solve, or what types of clients you serve, Clio can be used to fit your workflow.

As in the example above, look beyond the specific legal problem you hope your clients will hire you to solve to find earlier opportunities to show them how you can help.

Even the job which law schools supposedly do well, which is to indoctrinate impressionable youth in arcane legal reasoning, can actually get in the way of running a law firm, because law schools teach students how to identify issues or problems, but not how to solve them.

The course is aimed at introducing law students to the changing legal landscape and helping them understand how technology can be applied to law by teaching basic technology skills, showcasing available legal technologies and developing technical problem - solving abilities.

Good ad copy articulates and defines legal problems and shows how you're the lawyer to help solve them.

As matters presently stand in most American law schools, it is quite possible to obtain a J.D. without ever having taken an international law course or without having considered how other countries might approach or solve a legal problem.

So how should we start thinking about that when we think about the construction of the legal system and how to solve that problem?

Then I think there's kind of this parallel track of issues to unpack where there's a distinction between small firms that have built their business model around being able to help solve problems of access, whether that's around unbundling their services or how they do their pricing, or giving away some free do it yourself content on the front end, whether that's also as part of their lead acquisition strategy or just as a service to people who need it, is I think separate from people who then volunteer their time in pro bono efforts, or people who donate their money to legal charitable causes.

That's how I learned how Science Citation Indexes really worked, courtesy of a law - student friend who sat me down in the law library and showed me how the legal community solved a harder version of the very same problem.

I guess maybe what I'm thinking is that by opening up the window, by learning how to code, learning what's possible, it lets you see a different way of serving clients and solving legal problems, and part of me thinks that, as new possibilities come online, new ways of serving clients by building tools that fix things, like this parking ticket app, like a service that allows lawyers to build a referral network that makes them look more like a giant, spread out firm, and other things, as these possibilities come out there, you can stop thinking about serving just one client's legal needs, and start thinking about solving that legal problem for anyone who comes to you.

(2) I believe that trying to find a just solution to a contentious matter is as if not more demanding than arguing for its resolution according to legal precedents (I always tell my students that they are mistaken if they believe that mooting is the pinnacle of intellectual achievement in law school — in fact it is learning how to negotiate, mediate and problem - solve)(3) Learning how to problem - solve (which includes relating to the people as well as the problem) is a good deal more practical and important for prospective lawyers than being able to find and apply legal precedent, any well - trained monkey can learn to do that and (4) I think we make the mistake all the time of imagining that knowledge and skills are somehow binary processes.

Participating in critical reflection and rounds encourages students to help one another and themselves in learning how to problem solve, situate their legal practice within a broader social context, and support their self - care.

But what makes them useful in solving real problems for consumers and businesses just as LISA does, resides in the imagination of the new legal service creators in how they use these technologies and their willingness and ability to go there.

They want to know how to solve a legal problem, and they want to know why you are the best attorney for them.

The consequences of not learning how to solve the problem are very destructive consequences to: (1) the population; (2) the courts and the justice system; and, (3) the legal profession.

Inspired by Lon Fuller, who, in Rod Macdonald's words, «saw law as a human project, a human accomplishment, and a human aspiration that emerges from ongoing patterns of human interaction and the reciprocal adjustment of human expectation,» he conceived legal education as being, at its core, learning how «to attend to the complexities of human beings in interaction with each other,» stating that we should teach how law could be «a facilitator of human interaction» and «about finding social outcomes that help solve human problems [rather than] perfecting abstract concepts to solve legal puzzles.»

For all of that, what I most value about my legal training is that it taught me how to solve problems and help others solve theirs.

But after reading their new Rule creating «Limited License Legal Technicians (LLLT's)» I wondered how it would solve either of those problems.

However, the building of this kind of process requires a knowledge about substantive legal problems and how people practically can solve them which would go beyond what a court in this country would normally hold themselves out as holding.

Despite these limitations, AttorneyFee.com is making a major contribution towards providing a visible data base about how much it costs to solve legal problems.

Lisa Needham's Lawyerist column, «Legal Tech Is Solving All the Wrong Problems,» laments that despite the rich array of technology available to law firms, attorneys «seem unable to figure out how to leverage technology for the greater ease of the profession.»

Henderson said he is studying different examples of how innovators in the law are seeking to have their ideas adopted, such as a legal group trying to solve the problem of banks and private equity firms paying too much for ordinary contract services.

This question is being asked more broadly in Law Schools as legal academics and lawyers bring design principles to the question of where and how people access legal education, where and how people learn about law, and where and how people solve the problems that matter most in their lives.

We invite you to consider how you might join us in highlighting the many ways that you assist clients in legal problem - solving.

We discussed the genesis of Sadie Blue Software, the problems that Agility Blue solves, why project management has become so important in efficiently managing legal projects, and how the development of tools like Agility Blue reflect where the legal market is headed in 2017, among other topics.

The latest legal needs survey in the Netherlands (Geschilbeslechtingsdelta 2014) suggests that 48 per cent of people seeking assistance in the legal sector want advice about how to solve problems; 45 per cent advice about their rights and obligations; 24 per cent help with approaching the other party; 20 per cent mediation; 18 per cent some kind of financial advice; and 16 per cent help with starting a procedure.

In a broader way, it could change how we solve many routine legal problems.

This course explores how human centered design and other creative problem solving methods and mindsets inform three areas: (1) the delivery of legal services, (2) how we solve clients» (legal) problems, and (3) how law students can intentionally shape their professional journeys.

And the emergence of «legal wellness checkups» illustrates how this new problem - solving approach might work in practice.

I have always liked this book and use it in training, particularly for the sections on learning how to analyze facts in legal problem solving and then applying the law to the facts, often a challenge for rookie legal researchers.

In retrospect, I realize that I in fact don't necessarily address this challenge head on in my book, aside from citing some of the suggestions on how to analyze the facts and the law made by Maureen Fitzgerald in her Legal Problem Solving — Reasoning, Research & Writing (now in a 2010 5th ed from LexisNexis Canada).

The mediators can demystify the divorce process, organize the material that needs to be addressed, provide basic legal information, and offer examples of how other families have solved the problems that must be addressed in moving to, or formalizing, separate lives.

You need to know how consumers are changing the industry, how to solve their problems better than the competition and how to avoid legal pitfalls.