Sentences with phrase «solve your legal problems such»

LexMeet provides you with the list of lawyers of varying expertise, experience, dialect and location that fits your requirement to solve your legal problems such as...

Not exact matches

And therefore devices such as the following are used by law societies: (1) methods to control an alleged over-supply of lawyers; (2) «alternative legal services,» which are charity, simplistic services, and without the benefit of the solicitor - client relationship (pro bono services being but a very small exception, and possibly targeted legal services); and, (3) the sponsoring of «apps,» (the application of electronic technology to legal services), the effect of which upon the problem is unknown and unanalyzed, and can not solve any such access to justice problem.

Therefore, the problem and its long history of failure, requires government intervention, because law societies, being the regulators of the legal profession in Canada, do not realize that they do not understand the true nature of the problem and won't accept the fact that they and all other such institutions within the legal profession do not have the expertise necessary to solve the problem.

But because law societies in Canada have done nothing to try to solve the unaffordable legal services problem («the problem»), they have undercut their ability to prosecute them for UPL for the reason that such organizations are not themselves licensed lawyers.

(A problem that could easily be solved for legal proceedings by amending subsections such as, s. 31.5 CEA and s. 34.1 (8) OEA, and s. 41.6 of the Alberta Evidence Act (AEA), to state that «systems integrity» can be established by proof of compliance with 72.34.)

So why does the majority of LSUC's membership tolerate such preference given to the interests of benchers of law firms that serve large institutions and potential investors and not to solving the unaffordable legal services problems of middle and lower income people?

(1) management by part - time amateurs (benchers), whose work is mostly charity — «amateurs» because they don't have the expertise necessary for solving difficult problems such as the unaffordability of legal services (and they don't try to get it);

Such investors are «another mouth to feed,» without the ability to solve the unaffordable legal advice services problem.

What this perhaps shows is that legal tech start - ups may need to wield very smart and advanced technology, such as machine learning, but the problems they need to solve to be of use to lawyers are in fact sometimes of the simplest nature.

By using lawyers to solve legal problems that can cause illness — from fixing faulty furnaces to navigating immigration rules that may make patients afraid to apply for food or housing assistance — doctors believe they can prevent more serious health crises, such as malnutrition, job loss, and domestic violence.»

But their purpose is to make money by controlling the legal services market, and not to solve social welfare problems such as the unaffordability legal advice services.

I learned about the importance of medical - legal partnerships, where lawyers can be part of the team at VA medical facilities and I have learned that when lawyers are on the team they can often help solve the underlying problem that brings the veteran to the facility, such as homelessness and without the exposure on the street the veteran has a place to live, often they don't need to come to the medical facility as often.

Until the problem of «the unavailability to the majority of the population of legal services at reasonable cost» is solved, the prosecutors of this offence should be Crown counsel, or at the least such prosecutions should require approval by Crown counsel.

Until the problem of «the unavailability to the majority of the population of legal services at reasonable cost» is solved, the prosecutors of this offence should be Crown counsel, or at the least such prosecutions... [more]

Sebastian Ko, Regional Director and Senior Legal Counsel of integrated legal technology provider Epiq, believes innovation in law will bring about transformational change and solve long unresolved problems in the law, such as access to jusLegal Counsel of integrated legal technology provider Epiq, believes innovation in law will bring about transformational change and solve long unresolved problems in the law, such as access to juslegal technology provider Epiq, believes innovation in law will bring about transformational change and solve long unresolved problems in the law, such as access to justice.

There has been no such national effort to solve the national unaffordable legal services problem, and no progress towards a solution.

Blame law societies for the unaffordable legal services problem because: (1) everything they do in regard to the problem is aimed at helping the public get used to living with the problem, such as promoting «alternative legal services,» but nothing is done to try to solve the problem; and, (2) law societies do not sponsor the innovations necessary to make legal services affordable again.

Such problems can then become key focus points for FLIP and its participants as they seek to leverage technology to solve legal industry challenges.

Therefore it is impossible for such law firms to achieve the necessary cost - efficiency to solve the problem of unaffordable legal services.

And it wouldn't solve the problem of people who are not barred anywhere, such as the many paralegals who do doc review side by side with licensed lawyers, or the thousands of foreign lawyers who do offshore outsourced legal process work.

Henderson said he is studying different examples of how innovators in the law are seeking to have their ideas adopted, such as a legal group trying to solve the problem of banks and private equity firms paying too much for ordinary contract services.

And law societies don't have a government - type civil service to provide the necessary continuing expertise for solving such problems as unaffordable legal services.

wouldn't tell the public that the problem is not the Law Society's problem, as in effect it does; (15) LSUC's website wouldn't state that lay benchers «represent the public interest,» which is impossible now that we are well beyond the 19th century; (16) CanLII's services would be upgraded in kind and volume to be a true support service, able to have a substantial impact upon the problem, and several other developed support services, all provided at cost, would together, provide a complete solution; (17) LSUC's management would not be part - time management by amateurs - amateurs because benchers don't have the expertise to solve the problem, nor are they trying to get it, nor are they joining with Canada's other law societies to solve this national problem; (18) the Federation of Law Societies of Canada would not describe the problem as being one of mere «gaps in access to legal services» (see its Sept. 2012 text, «Inventory of Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada» (1st paragraph), (19) LSUC would not be encouraging the use alternatives to lawyers, such as law students, self - help, and «unbundled, targeted» legal services, as a «cutting costs by cutting competence» strategy; and, (20) it would not be necessary to impose an Ontario version of the Clementi Report (UK, 2004) that would separate LSUC's regulatory functions from its representative functions, to be exercised by separate authorilegal services» (see its Sept. 2012 text, «Inventory of Access to Legal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada» (1st paragraph), (19) LSUC would not be encouraging the use alternatives to lawyers, such as law students, self - help, and «unbundled, targeted» legal services, as a «cutting costs by cutting competence» strategy; and, (20) it would not be necessary to impose an Ontario version of the Clementi Report (UK, 2004) that would separate LSUC's regulatory functions from its representative functions, to be exercised by separate authoriLegal Services Initiatives of the Law Societies of Canada» (1st paragraph), (19) LSUC would not be encouraging the use alternatives to lawyers, such as law students, self - help, and «unbundled, targeted» legal services, as a «cutting costs by cutting competence» strategy; and, (20) it would not be necessary to impose an Ontario version of the Clementi Report (UK, 2004) that would separate LSUC's regulatory functions from its representative functions, to be exercised by separate authorilegal services, as a «cutting costs by cutting competence» strategy; and, (20) it would not be necessary to impose an Ontario version of the Clementi Report (UK, 2004) that would separate LSUC's regulatory functions from its representative functions, to be exercised by separate authorities.

A T - shaped lawyer has deep legal expertise (long vertical bar of the T) but also has enough knowledge of and appreciation for other disciplines (shallower horizontal bar of the T) such as technology, business, analytics, and data security to better problem solve and collaborate with professionals with expertise in those areas.

Learning the law from such seasoned practitioners provides students with a nuanced appreciation of the connections between legal theory and real - world problem - solving.

Aside from iPhones, FaceTime, Slack, Trello, videoconferencing, and all the other ubiquitous tech we rely on, there is also a range of new technologies available to help solve legal problems, such as «artificial intelligence, machine learning, practice management technology, automated document assembly, predictive coding and mapping technology.»

The ethical approach to the A2J problem is first to determine if the problem can be solved, and if clearly it can not be solved, only then to engage in programs such as: the law societies» «alternative legal services»; [5] «Access to Justice Week»; an A2J committee; and, comparable efforts such as the NSRLP (the National Self - Represented Litigants Project).

Without such an institution providing permanently developing expertise and advice, they have no capacity to solve complex problems like the unaffordable legal services problem.

That is where BunnyToken will solve a major problem and offer merchant accounts for all legal businesses in the industry as well as individual workers such as actors and webcam performers all with low fair fees.