Sentences with phrase «solving legal problems so»

We are a full service business law firm dedicated to solving legal problems so that you can focus on business.

Our business is to focus on solving your legal problems so that you can devote your attention to your life and your business.

Not exact matches

But is it within the competence (not to mention the legal authority) of the federal government to solve those problems, or will their efforts to do so simply make things worse for educators, school leaders, and policymakers in the places that really matter?

In the legal world, the next problem the alarmists have to solve is to get the US Supreme Court to make all the legal «let's pretends» concerning the CPP «legal» by declaring them to be so.

«Mindfulness can help us become more aware of each other and our communication deficiencies across the firm so that we work to improve and integrate our problem - solving, responsiveness and interpersonal skills with our legal skills.

For further details see (pdf downloads): (1) «Access to Justice — Unaffordable Legal Services» Concepts and Solutions»; (2) «The Technology of Centralized Legal Research Can Solve the Unaffordable Legal Services Problem»; (3) «Access to Justice — Canada's Unaffordable Legal Services — CanLII as the Necessary Support Service»; (4) «A2J: Preventing the Abolition of Law Societies by Curing the Defects in their Management Structure: A Solution to the Unaffordable Legal Services Problem»; (5) «A2J: «Let Them Eat Cake,» So Let Them Use Alternative Legal Services»; (6) Indexing; (7) Sometimes Laws are Too Important to be Left to Lawyers — Lawyers Without Technical Support,» (Slaw January 28, 2016), and other access to justice (A2J) articles on my SSRN author's page, and Slaw author's page.

So why does the majority of LSUC's membership tolerate such preference given to the interests of benchers of law firms that serve large institutions and potential investors and not to solving the unaffordable legal services problems of middle and lower income people?

These programs keep our attorneys abreast of technology and current legal issues, and they sharpen litigation skills so our attorneys problem - solve more efficiently for our clients.

I think, so often lawyers try to solve problems with lawyers, so I think anytime you can involve technology, business folks from your company that are the end - receivers of your legal output, and really bring different thinking, and I think that's where you'll get your best solutions for, «Are we solving the right problem?»

Saying legal tech sucks is not going to solve anything, so let's instead collaborate in the real world to solve real problems.

Some investors find that lawyers are not innovative enough to disrupt an industry, so lawyers then seek out tech disrupters with legal industry knowledge (a hard find) to solve their problems.

Lawyers are never taught this second step, which is not part of the legal process, and so lawyers tend to believe that a group of lawyers, sitting in a conference room, can solve firm management problems without any additional input, learning, or testing.

I mean it's this interesting dynamic that we've talked about on the show before where there's for sure the distinction between access to justice and access to lawyers, and that you can have your legal problem or your life problem with legal implications solved without necessarily needing to engage a lawyer, so not all access to justice problems are access to lawyer problems.

So how should we start thinking about that when we think about the construction of the legal system and how to solve that problem?

He suggests that if clients hired firms that were interested in solving problems rather than rounding up billing and carrying overhead, they might not have to spend so much time auditing their legal bills.

She says, «This research shows technology can help solve two problems: both making contracts faster and more reliable, and freeing up resources so legal departments can focus on building the quality of their human legal teams.»

«I am indeed impressed to see so many talented minds collaborate and come up with feasible solutions to solve certain legal problems in society.»

So: threaten law societies that if they don't get competent to solve the problem of unaffordable legal services, then we must petition government to abolish law societies which would be the best thing that could be done for the population, the justice system, and the legal profession itself.

And so, the only way that the problem of unaffordable legal services will be solved is by way of government programs for socialized law.

Therefore, if bencher election candidates» campaign literature doesn't provide a detailed strategy for solving the unaffordable legal services problem, don't vote for them, and tell them so when you see them.

Make us your partner to solve your legal problems with à la carte services so you pay for only what you need and nothing else.

So, to reap the harvest of the great volume of new legal work that technology will bring the legal profession, it must first solve the problem of unaffordable legal services.

These great successes prove that the «unaffordable legal services problem» can be solved with the power of a collectively as represented by a law society, rather than attempting to do so by way of the very limited powers and resources of individual law firms negotiating with high - powered investors.

Legal AI has been so successful already because the bigger story is always one about positive change, the one about using technology to solve problems, deliver value, open up new areas of insight and capability, as well as to boost productivity, not just in the law, but across the entire economy.

The restrictions are so severe that the result is to deprive North Carolina's citizens of low cost solutions to solving many legal problems, inhibits innovation in developing legal solutions by an emerging self - help legal software industry, stifles competition to attorneys from self - help legal software publishers in the State of North Carolina, and will eliminate any possibility of private investment in self - help legal software development.

Therefore we see for example, LSUC embracing apps, with no assessment as to: (1) their relation to, and impact upon solving the problem; (2) their ability to bring about the economies - of - scale so badly needed in the production of legal services; (3) their ability to serve and sustain the continued existence of the general practitioner; (4) the prevalence (frequency and availability) of the solicitor - client relationship among all of the many and fast - moving developments in the provision of legal services; and, (5) the issues set out above.

There are obviously good (ethics related) reasons why legal professionals may be reluctant to collaborate (as I have just defined it) online, but it's hard to fathom that there is absolutely no reasonable and prudent model that would allow us to tap into the more collaborative nature of the web to solve legal problems and, while doing so, meet unmet legal needs.

«Our clients are going to look for other ways to solve their problems, so we as a profession and in general in the legal industry need to move much more in the direction of solving that problem,» he says.

Both solutions will occur because the power of the news media and of the internet, interacting, will quickly make widely known these types of information, the cumulative effect of which will force governments and the courts to act: (1) the situations of the thousands of people whose lives have been ruined because they could not obtain the help of a lawyer; (2) the statistics as to the increasing percentages of litigants who are unrepresented and clogging the courts, causing judges to provide more public warnings; (3) the large fees that some lawyers charge; (4) increasing numbers of people being denied Legal Aid and court - appointed lawyers; (5) the many years that law societies have been unsuccessful in coping with this problem which continues to grow worse; (6) people prosecuted for «the unauthorized practice of law» because they tried to help others desperately in need of a lawyer whom they couldn't afford to hire; (7) that there is no truly effective advertising creating competition among law firms that could cause them to lower their fees; (8) that law societies are too comfortably protected by their monopoly over the provision of legal services, which is why they might block the expansion of the paralegal profession, and haven't effectively innovated with electronic technology and new infrastructure so as to be able to solve this problem; (9) that when members of the public access the law society website they don't see any reference to the problem that can assure them that something effective is being done and, (10) in order for the rule of law, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the whole of Canada's constitution be able to operate effectively and command sufficient respect, the majority of the population must be able to obtain a lawyer at reasonable Legal Aid and court - appointed lawyers; (5) the many years that law societies have been unsuccessful in coping with this problem which continues to grow worse; (6) people prosecuted for «the unauthorized practice of law» because they tried to help others desperately in need of a lawyer whom they couldn't afford to hire; (7) that there is no truly effective advertising creating competition among law firms that could cause them to lower their fees; (8) that law societies are too comfortably protected by their monopoly over the provision of legal services, which is why they might block the expansion of the paralegal profession, and haven't effectively innovated with electronic technology and new infrastructure so as to be able to solve this problem; (9) that when members of the public access the law society website they don't see any reference to the problem that can assure them that something effective is being done and, (10) in order for the rule of law, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the whole of Canada's constitution be able to operate effectively and command sufficient respect, the majority of the population must be able to obtain a lawyer at reasonable legal services, which is why they might block the expansion of the paralegal profession, and haven't effectively innovated with electronic technology and new infrastructure so as to be able to solve this problem; (9) that when members of the public access the law society website they don't see any reference to the problem that can assure them that something effective is being done and, (10) in order for the rule of law, the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and the whole of Canada's constitution be able to operate effectively and command sufficient respect, the majority of the population must be able to obtain a lawyer at reasonable cost.

We discussed the genesis of Sadie Blue Software, the problems that Agility Blue solves, why project management has become so important in efficiently managing legal projects, and how the development of tools like Agility Blue reflect where the legal market is headed in 2017, among other topics.

Summary With so many new changes on the horizon in the legal industry there are tons of interesting problems to solve and interesting things to learn with a future we can barely imagine.

It is because interdisciplinary collaboration is so crucial for solving today's complex problems that we wonder if labeling this approach «legal design» is counterproductive.

We often hear clients want a focus on value, which translates to thinking like the clients, understanding their business, solving their legal problems and helping them manage costs — and doing so in a predictable fashion.

«Customers trust Elevate to help them solve their problems managing and performing legal work — and to do so efficiently and effectively,» said Liam Brown, Founder and Chairman of Elevate.

Wright and Perrin would want to solve the political problem, and so would not be able to see that the problem also had legal and ethical dimensions.

Unbundling legal services or providing clients with assistance à la carte can go a long way in helping to solve the access to justice problem that is so apparent in family... Read more

Unbundling legal services or providing clients with assistance à la carte can go a long way in helping to solve the access to justice problem that is so apparent in family law, says Toronto - area family lawyer