Another author I know got a one - star for her historical mystery because
somebody ordered it thinking it was how - two book about medieval embroidery.
Not exact matches
But Shostak
thinks we already might have attracted
somebody's attention: «The kind of equipment that we have today is within four
orders of magnitude of being able to detect radars on nearby worlds, within a few tens of light - years.
«If you
think your health is fixed — you can't do much to change it, you associate it with something purely genetic — you're maybe not as motivated to follow doctor's
orders, compared to
somebody who sees health as something that can be improved through behavior,» she says.
And for me, when
somebody says, «in
order to read my writing, you're really going to have to reach to understand...» and I
think that's a flaw on the side of the writer, not the reader because a writer should be able to make things as simple as possible... to flow not only into this culture, but in the future so
somebody can pick up this book in the future and have an understanding of this world.
,» but if you
think about broadening the audience, you can't assume that
somebody can left - click down on the stick and hold the right trigger and then hit Y over and over in
order to solve some problem.
Sometimes you need to disturb in
order to make the space for
somebody to
think.»