Not exact matches
I quite realize that this may seem an exaggerated, even an emotive, way of
stating it; but I am quite sure that any honest man or woman, conscious of his mortality, is also conscious of the
fact that he is not what he might have been, that he can not shift the blame to
somebody else's shoulders (however many extenuating circumstances he may feel justified in adducing), and that, in at least one sense, the sense I have indicated above, he is a mortal failure.
How would
somebody report someone who
stated they were married, but were in
fact not?
«And so I would very much like the academy or
somebody — because
somebody's got to do this — to take advantage of the
fact that we have all these
states doing different experiments and take, for example, three or four
states with very different assessments for science, Maryland would be one, and then actually do some research on what's the effect of teaching and learning of these different kinds of tests.»
Those who oppose capital punishment on moral grounds will not be persuaded, I expect, unless it can be demonstrated pretty clearly that the proposed scheme will work to reduce the total number of deaths — and even then the
fact that it is the
state that is killing
somebody will be an insuperable objection for a number of people.
Obviously this is far more than just semantics; it encourages the idea that marriages break up because
somebody is at fault, despite the
fact that every
state has at least one ground for divorce that does not require a determination of marital fault.