It is worth looking in more detail though at the spin that has persuaded so many people that the case is
somehow about the judges rejecting the referendum result.
Not exact matches
What's more, you may feel guilty or embarrassed
about not feeling happy after having your baby, worried that it's
somehow your fault and you'll be
judged by others.
But
judging by the number of hits that crazy post still draws, the term itself seemed to
somehow become a rallying cry - popping up wherever smart people were talking
about game criticism, or the lack thereof (again, nothing to do with me - on August 18th game - story duality was the furthest thing from my mind... I was on a plane to Leipzig I think).
They start more or less from the proposition that the modern warming period is unnatural (and many here, I
judge would agree to some extent or another) and thus they would want to say looking at the first highly resoloved star with planets which being
somehow thought to be unique by other independent means that it says something
about that uniqueness.
Lawyers love to complain
about how the
judges who preside over their cases
somehow got it wrong.
Richard George Kopf, who blogs
about life as a federal trial
judge over at Hercules and the Umpire, did an interesting thought experiment in relation to this case where he wondered if it was appropriate to use a peremptory strike of a juror if that juror is ugly and your client doesn't want ugly people on the jury or the case is
somehow related to physical beauty.
The appeal
judge held: «It is difficult in looking at all of this in these circumstances to conclude that [the applicant] was
somehow caught off - guard when speaking with Mr. May and confused
about what his instructions were to be.»