But, noted Nancy Knowlton of the Smithsonian Institution National Museum of Natural History in Washington, D.C., «If we do want to have reefs around by 2050, we are going to have to do
something about carbon dioxide» to slow global warming and acidification.
Not exact matches
Fossil fuels cost a lot of money and [have] a lot of climate impact; that's
something we haven't covered either, but this plan will also reduce
carbon dioxide emissions to
about a third of what they are now [by] 2050, assuming some level of growth as well.
These are just a few obvious examples, but because the future Fox News pundit was talking
about climate change let's consider
something that is indisputable: the measured rise of
carbon dioxide in the earth's atmosphere is numerically consistent with that predicted from the output of human industrial activity.
On the Harris quote, «
about half of all
carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has come from the developing world» someone got
something wrong.
I'll give an example because a) I want to show the traditional use of «heat and light» and some other points I've made but b) this page too has slipped in a fake fisics meme, much as a lot of papers do giving real research results which then slip in
something about «global warming» or
carbon dioxide» to justify their grant..
Or is this
something that will be forced on us by some who have faith / vested / financial interests, and no science to back up the claims
about the effects of
carbon dioxide?
Dr. Theodore A. Scambos, a glaciologist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center at the University of Colorado, said the long life of Larsen B «makes you think there's
something particularly unusual
about this warming» — perhaps evidence that the warming has been brought on by artificial emissions of
carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases that trap heat in the atmosphere.
, we should accept the fact that
carbon dioxide is a pollutant and start doing
something about it.
Somehow the megacaldera events dwarf the entire human output for
carbon dioxide and particulates... * that * is
something to worry
about and until someone does a real good job defining subsurface structures, water infiltration, crustal stress, and magmatic uplift and composition, the actual, real problems of this planet will not be addressed.
If you listen to climate scientists — and despite the relentless campaign to discredit their work, you should — it is long past time to do
something about emissions of
carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases.
«The last 25 years» increase may have little to do with global warming, or the models may have missed
something about how nature responds to the increase in
carbon dioxide.»