A former professor and a student at Charlotte School of Law should know
something about causation, and so they have sued the American Bar Association for their problems at the law school.
Not exact matches
For one, the universe may only appear to have order, just as
causation may only appear to actually exist, when in fact any given event may be said to have unlimited causes and we only limit are decision on what «truly» caused
something to GIVE order to the universe — think
about all the finger pointing that goes on every time
something unexpected happens.
Observational studies of this type have several limitations, the main one being that it is difficult to establish
causation — for example, was it the electronic cigarettes that caused people to stop smoking or was it
something else
about the e-cigarette users that made them more likely to quit?
Looking for signatures in tropical storms, while an interesting diversion, is nonetheless a diversion from strengthening the case for anthropogenic
causation and the need to do
something about it.
Further, I think that Gavin's point
about the earthquakes having «nothing to do with climate change», true in terms of
causation, otherwise leaves out
something utterly central to this discussion.
Now we'll talk
about negligence where an intentional tort is
about someone doing
something they weren't supposed to do negligence usually happens when someone doesn't do
something they were supposed to do there are 3 parts to a negligence case duty breach and
causation first, duty... heh, «duty» this is your duty not to -LSB-...]
And, I suppose there's some reason to consider there's some basis for believing the fact that the Ontario Court of Appeal and the British Columbia Court of Appeal seem to have different views on the law regarding
causation could be some basis for believing there's
something about the law regarding
causation that's a wee bit controversial (even accepting that the division of powers structure in the Constitution Act means that that conflict IS constitutional).
But one does not need to be overly cynical to wonder whether this embrace is not born out of sheer frustration with the inability to say
something interesting yet true
about what constitutes the essence of
causation.
An argument has been made — for example, in Lynda M. Collins «
Causation, contribution and Clements: Revisiting the material contribution test in Canadian tort law» (2011), 19 Tort L. Rev. 86 — that there is
something inherently uncertain
about vehicle dynamics because (in the scheme of human scientific progress) this subject is relatively new.
The truth
about factual
causation issues in most personal injury actions is that, where there's any issue at all, it's not one that involves difficult questions of law or any need to venture into realms of philosophy or metaphysics, abstract, concrete or
something else.
Alternatively, there may be
something about marriage that increases individuals» resilience against health problems (aka
causation theory).