Sentences with phrase «something about the answers»

We need to have the vision, drive, and agility to do something about the answers so we can become an agent of change rather than a victim of change.

Not exact matches

Good answer: The candidate raised an issue about a process, a procedure, another department... something that won't make the boss defensive.

There's something convenient about being able to ask a question and get the answer out of thin air.

Our answers suggest we are sensitive about the one percenters taking advantage of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's desire to do something big in this regard.

The ethos of the Bush - era CIA was «know - nothingism,» as Paul Krugman put it at The New York Times, «the insistence that there are simple, brute - force, instant - gratification answers to every problem, and that there's something effeminate and weak about anyone who suggests otherwise.»

The answer is to be truthful about how these issues came about and to do something about it.»

Hobson was upset — she remembered her early experience as being all about paying her dues — but she realized something: «It all goes back to the cell phone,» she says, meaning that since cell phones have been around, young people had access to instant answers (be it from their mom or Google).

In an opinion piece published in November, The Wall Street Journal said AFL - CIO President Richard Trumka «and his liberal allies are on to something here, and we hope to make common cause with them in seeking more information on the important questions about Mr. Lew that were never answered in 2013.»

No, you're not meant to answer with something about your industry or title.

My answer is that they need to be long enough that you can communicate something that matters (like providing a real insight), while eliminating everything your prospect doesn't care about.

To avoid this oversight, you must be prepared to answer an investor's questions about how the investment will be monetized through, among other things, licensing agreements with larger companies or a strategic sale of itself to a larger company, not just an IPO scenario in which you see yourself becoming CEO of a Fortune 500 company (something that almost never happens).

The naive answer would then be something like this: the model says over a 60 - year period you should earn about 8.85 % / year, considering that the first ten years, you should earn around 5.63 % / year.

Without one, you'll find that either you spend the whole day answering questions about the story so that a journalist has enough details to write something interesting, or it just won't get picked up because it's too much like hard work for an already busy reporter.

My answer my not satisfy you, but all I can say about feeling Christ's presence in my life, is that it is something I can't not do.

To understand the answer to your question you need to know a little something about the cosmological constant, vacuum energy and virtual particles.

and the thundering voice of God answered, «There's just something about you that pisses me off»

But she rarely answers the phone, because she's either on the other line trying to straighten out something about insurance coverage or she's just too exhausted to talk.

But, of course, this presumes that we can and should be able to say something about the structure of this «very best» — in order that we may know how great is the worth of the bond we may have to give up in answer to Jesus» call, and in order to find words to describe, however haltingly, the community of promise.

The following is the answer that + Vincent gave at a press conference, to a question about the provision of an Ordinariate «cathedral»: «I think that is something probably beyond their resources at the present time, and I don't think the Ordinariate would thank us, actually, to simply give it responsibility for a church that it would have to then maintain and upkeep.»

In all probability the answer will not include a phrase about glorifying God, although it may say a fair amount about enjoying something or other.

You first started off with something about keeping track of peoples prayers in your mens club and that they are mostly answered.

Jesus wanted to show that there was something God cared about more than right answers to tough questions.

My point is... I'm not saying I have all the answers to this problem here, but let's think about what the ramifications might be before we say or do something.

But the answer we give says something about who we are and who our God is.

Not only is Fr Tolhurst encouraging the faithful to use the Catechism as a living document, something that is integral to maturation of faith, but he is also attempting to equip us to answer questions about our faith that others may ask of us:

They may tell us that in dealing with such phenomena as «religiosity» or «humanism» it is irrelevant and out of order to inquire about the «something» that lies behind them, and thereby protest against the conclusion that the only answer to all ultimate questions is the Nihil.

Now this isn't a super strong argument, because as soon as you tell another Christian they are wrong about something because you have the mind of Christ, they will answer right back that you are wrong because they have the mind of Christ.

Jeremy i am surprised you never countered my argument Up till now the above view has been my understanding however things change when the holy spirit speaks.He amazes me because its always new never old and it reveals why we often misunderstand scripture in the case of the woman caught in adultery.We see how she was condemned to die and by the grace of God Jesus came to her rescue that seems familar to all of us then when they were alone he said to her Go and sin no more.This is the point we misunderstand prior to there meeting it was all about her death when she encountered Jesus something incredible happened he turned a death situation into life situation so from our background as sinners we still in our thinking and understanding dwell in the darkness our minds are closed to the truth.In effect what Jesus was saying to her and us is chose life and do nt look back that is what he meant and that is the walk we need to live for him.That to me was a revelation it was always there but hidden.Does it change that we need discipline in the church that we need rules and guidelines for our actions no we still need those things.But does it change how we view non believers and even ourselves definitely its not about sin but its all about choosing life and living.He also revealed some other interesting things on salvation so i might mention those on the once saved always saved discussion.Jeremy just want to say i really appreciate your website because i have not really discussed issues like this and it really is making me press in to the Lord for answers to some of those really difficult questions.regards brentnz

I firmly believe in the power of prayer, but I get a little irritated when I hear people talking about how God answered their prayer for a great parking spot or something like that.

Just because we don't have answers to something that occurred further back doesn't mean things we've learned about more recent developments are not true.

Their answer will invariably go something like this: «We were not always successful sexually, and we have had to learn much about each other from each other.

How about something simple like God taking time out between watching football games and answering the prayers of the Christians on offense or the Christians on defense?

Mirosal... you are not doing great with any answers... as a matter of fact you arent answering any questions... you are asking them... and why is it so important to claim that you are atheist... this is false pride... something that is evident in any unatural and foolish human group... its almost as if people hide behind this false pride to make them feel better for things they know in their own heart are foolish... and what need is there for order if there is no GOD... because if no one cared about their soul... then this might become the dog eat dog world that you people are hoping for

In the background of every significant human activity is the discovery of something in the cosmos that we can rely on, depend on, have faith in, and the more we know about the universe the more we find factors here that answer our trust so that we can act on the basis of their dependability.

In this chapter I plan to discuss the question and to say something about the «hope», although I know that I can not provide an adequate answer to the former and I am in no position to speak with certainty about the latter.

If you know anything about the bible then you already know the answer to this, so why are you spouting something that you already know has already been answered?

This «True Believer» mindset is, in my opinion, something to consider, observe, and basically ignore during your deconstruction (which is a time of asking questions about what you believe and searching for answers).

It would be the height of pride to think because we can come up with a scenario about God that other humans can't answer, that we have proven something about God.

My last point and Im out... Throughout our great nations history... we always found a way to fight through national issues and come up with solutions... Giving the problems we have now to people in the 50's and 60's... and they may actually come up with a solution... if you earnestly care about making a change... start at the lowest levels of government... go do something... find out costs... expenses... how to get more health care to people... do things like that... quit waiting on the government to provide all the answers... its not the way this country was founded... and not the way we get through problems... If you or ur family does nt have insurance... get a job that can provide you that... instead of hoping the government will do so... If you or ur family lacks access to education... move to an area that excels at it... education is invaluable... Do something about your problem... and quit waiting for the next big lotto...

To argue heatedly about something no one really knows the answer to is ridicluous and that is the ultimate nature of existence, it's all opinion or «faith» if you will.

I was hoping to get an answer from a creationist who wouldn't let their children learn about evolution, someone who would rather homeschool their child just to keep them from being exposed to something that very intelligent scientists have spent their whole lives working on.

If our models are to lead us to ask, and seek answers for, new questions about the world, we must regard them as something more than «logical superfluities», «illicit attempts at explanation», «convenient fictions», or the like.

It is told of Newman's Roman Catholic diocesan, the straightforward English monk Bishop Ullathorne of Birmingham, that he said something on his deathbed about St. Benedict and the angels, and when asked if he saw them answered, yes he did.56 Frank Weston returned from the plaudits of London crowds to die, as he would have wished to, in his mud and straw «palace» at Hegongo.

Now that I've read through the comments I can even see that the question I had (about what acid will react with the baking soda for leavening purposes) is answered and someone mentioned something intriguing about maple syrup.

I know this is the falafel stream, but I'm wondering if you can answer something for me about the veggie burgers?

Perhaps she's just a prodigy, or there's something we haven't learned about her yet that would answer that question.

To say I couldn't care less about winning is something I was going to answer but just realised it's not worth a response.

So assuming that the Frenchman is going to go for option A I thought I would try to find something positive about the situation for Arsenal fans to take some comfort from and maybe the strain of his constant international duties with Chile could be the answer.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Before I answer the question of how seriously Liverpool Football Club should take the cup competitions, I think it is important to first do something that Liverpool fans are famous for: talk about our history; it is vital to understand the philosophies that this great club was built on.