Sentences with phrase «something about the candidates»

I wish candidates ran without any party affiliation noted, it might make folks actually learn something about the candidates other than the D or R after their names.
Some suggestions: give visitors stuff to do besides just give you money, create a site design that says something about the candidate, recognize your best...
Some suggestions: give visitors stuff to do besides just give you money, create a site design that says something about the candidate, recognize your best volunteers, provide users with a behind - the - scenes look at your campaign, and create a community around your site.
In some cases, when I know something about the candidates and the political situation, I will include some of that information in this report.
«Democracy is only feasible when people know something about the candidates
This is interesting because it confirms something about the candidates themselves and who they are.
Knowing how her industry works, the specific dates allowed Zavitz to interpret something about the candidate's level of commitment.
Have you ever heard something about candidates, who forgot to add a contact information to their resumes?
A medical sales resume can tell a recruiter or hiring manager something about a candidate's qualifications, but hiring managers generally rely on the interview itself to get to know the candidate and see if they'll be a good fit.
You think you know what you're looking for: that «spark,» that intangible «it» factor, that «something about this candidate» that tells your intuition that this is the one.

Not exact matches

Good answer: The candidate raised an issue about a process, a procedure, another department... something that won't make the boss defensive.
In those rare situations, a candidate may find themselves talking about something awkward, like their relationship with their father.
Use the interview to actually learn something useful about the candidate.
Focus on questions that force the candidate to talk about a real situation where they had to take on a new challenge or figure out how to adapt to something unexpected.
Two questions are positively worded, meaning they ask the candidate to speak about something he or she did well.
This is a mind - bender that will really force the candidate to think quickly about something they've never been asked before, all while showing off the reasons they are a good fit for the job.
Asking a candidate to do something or share what they have done reveals a great deal about how they interact with others and what thought processes and trade - offs they make to get the job done.
If a candidate can share only platitudes about his or her preparation for something as important as a job interview, that speaks volumes about how this person will prepare for important tasks, meetings, roles, etc. when he or she actually has the job.
To apply, candidates must create their own drink that includes three ingredients that reveal something about their personality and post a picture of the drink on Instagram or Facebook using the hashtag #GrantsInterview by August 30.
But Babini represents something else entirely — something that no presidential candidate was harping on, that no voters were rallying about and that no Fox News or MSNBC pundit filled airtime railing against.
I don't know how many times I have heard Christians say something like this about their political aspirations, «If my candidate (insert name) isn't elected, the United States will fall apart, and I'm not sure I even want to be here when that happens.»
Then this morning I did see something about historic fact - facing of the party, that it could finally run a candidate without mentioning the «G» word as well as not mentioning Jerusalem as the capitol of Israel.
«It's really useful, if you get the chance to speak to your candidates, for them to hear that climate change is something that their voters care about and something that the Church cares about
Such problems may include «excessive affective dependency,» disproportionate aggression, incapacity to be faithful to obligations, incapacity for openness and trust, inability to cooperate with authority and confused sexual identity...» Of course all that is true; but wouldn't half an hour with a candidate over a pint tell most of us whether there is something about him that's a bit peculiar?
If the Christian right seeks to gain earthly political power (something Christ himself rejected when tempted by Satan), why don't they at least try to find candidates who support the very issues Christ actually spoke about & challenged us to address as his followers?
I think that I would respect and maybe even work for a candidate who either said he was a freethinker OR simply refused to talk about his religion on the basis of it being something very personal.
You get a bonus sentence if you say something GENUINELY positive and respectful about the opposing candidate (s).
The interesting thing about the liberal media is they pound the candidates with leading questions to trap them into saying something and then spin it out of context to use it for personal attacks.
There is something about a religious candidate that gives voters the impression that he has been through life's trials and has been humbled by them, that it was only his faith that saved him and allowed him to go on with his greater mission.
So what is it about a candidate who says something akin to a «man in the sky inspired me to run for president»?
Many, many times I find a candidate I would not normally have heard about or I find out that the reason the left is hating on them is something I identify with.
The Republican presidential candidate's 2007 church switch also may mirror something much more personal: The culmination of Perry's journey from a mainline Protestant upbringing to an evangelical - flavored faith built on close relationships with Baptist preachers and giving public testimony about God.
The more difficult but necessary move is to leave the complaints to others and turn our attention to the unique opportunities that churches, synagogues, meetings and mosques have to stimulate the encounters and transformations that could eventually give the candidates something to talk about.
In this election, questions about both candidates» personal faith have been discussed — and whether it's publicly lying about something or just saying inflammatory things — critics of either candidate can find «moral» reasons not support the other.
While speaking about the newly - released Planned Parenthood videos, a presidential candidate has walked back from a recent defense of their practices to say something you don't hear much anymore from the pro-choice crowd: «I have said for more than 22 years that....
Wilshere is the other candidate, Wilshere is fairly good going forward but as i have said is poor in tracking back, this is something i have seen on several matches, he was as much to blame about the second goal as Mert.
While I'm not wild about the idea of Morris as a candidate, I can at least accept the idea that if 75 percent of the electorate saw something that I didn't, maybe there's something I'm missing.
This year, it's not minnow vs. giant, necessarily, but Premier League relegation candidates Sunderland visit the Emirates in search of a morale - boosting win that will give their fans something to be happy about as they prepare to face fellow relegation fighters Swansea next Wednesday.
What makes me sick are the people who encouraged this woman to try something for which she was not a good candidate, and who lied to her about the safety of same, and who pushed her into feeling that how she gave birth was so important, and who are now neglecting her when she needs them and trying to sweep her and her baby under the rug and pretend her loss didn't occur because it doesn't fit in with their «natural birth is the only way» mindset.
It's not necessary at this stage for your candidates to know that they are nominated, but unless you know them well, it may be easier to write something about them if you have their cooperation.
We'll be talking about search marketing in the political world, not a surprise, with an eye toward getting ready for the 2010 election cycle — something that at least one candidate has already gotten a jump on.
Is there something really and truly unique about your campaign or candidate?
Researchers generally posit two psychological mechanisms underlying conformity: (1) people's desire to adopt the majority position so as to feel liked and accepted or believe they share the prevailing opinions of their community (i.e., social acceptance); and (2) people learn from the «wisdom of crowds,» or assume that other people did the research so their collective wisdom indicates something about the quality of the candidate or platform (i.e., social learning).
the reason for the court's blocking of a travel restriction put in place by the President of the United States of America for purposes of national security was because the president (when he was a candidate) mentioned something about banning certain people (i.e. those people who believe it is their duty to enslave the world under sharia law because god tells them to) during this time of war against those elements of said group who actually practice what they preach
The president noted that just as it is the case in the United States, the health of the candidates is something that the electorates will talk about, but then that will not form part of his campaign «I noticed in the US elections too there were issues about candidates» health so it's something that people will talk about but I don't take advantage of a person's health... I believe that I have enough to talk about without running on somebody's health».
McKinnon said something else about digital video that I hadn't considered before: until 2004, if you wanted to show the candidate or other staff member a TV ad that was still under construction, you'd need to ship a tape and put it in front of him.
In other words a candidate who knows something about the job.
I wrote recently about Isaacs» renewed effort to raise campaign cash for candidates outside his own jurisdiction as he lays he groundwork for his next bid at the state party chairmanship (something he says he won't do until Ed Cox steps down).
«Something I would say about every candidate is that everyone feels that the system is against them and there are a chosen few who will be selected to go on to do great things and everybody else is being lied to and so on.
It says something about the sad state of affairs in Albany when a newly elected governor has to barnstorm the state like a candidate on election eve to advance the same agenda that earned him a landslide victory only months before.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z