Sentences with phrase «something about the lies»

doesn't your babble say something about lying, or is it acceptable for the truly pious?

When they found it wasn't, they were extremely angry and determined to do something about the lies and incompetence.

Reading can be fun just about anywhere but there's something about lying down on a beach towel while reading the newest bestseller with the sound of waves crashing onto the shore that sure beats reading anywhere else.

There is something about lying by the pool or at the beach with a drink in your hand doing nothing.

Something about lying down with dogs and fleas, perhaps.

Not exact matches

«Anyone who tells you that they're a great place to work, without knowing something about you, is lying to you.

It means someone might be lying to you or giving you a hard time about something.

Comey said on a CNN program that aired Wednesday — watched by Trump — that he was always concerned when someone lied to the FBI, particularly if it was about something that an agent never asked about, as he said was the case with Trump.

«A day without truth is a lie, so every day I speak up about something.

I didn't lie to myself and talk about my passions and how if I was passionate enough about something I could be successful at it.

Although I was sad to leave my childhood home, something inside me was excited about the new adventure and opportunity that lie ahead of us.

Shortly thereafter, Daniels added a complaint in her lawsuit against Cohen, alleging defamation when on February 13 he stated in reference to claims of an affair that, «Just because something isn't true doesn't mean it can't cause you harm or damage,» implying that Daniels is lying about the affair.

There was no connection made between those two events by Hicks or by the president in announcing her departure... Yet, whether the two events were connected or not, Hicks had done something that is incompatible with serving in this administration: She told the truth about the lies.»

99.9 % of Religion in this day is like a very bad used car salesmen trying to sell you something to get your money and you drive off thinking you got something nice and you what you are getting is a clunker that will take you just far enough away that the saleman can steal your money because 99.9 % of what all religions claim about God is just a bunch of lies ON God taken out of context.

Somehow both old as the hills and joyful as the sun, his greatest lie is the one he seems (almost) to believe: «My lord, I was born about three of the clock in the afternoon, with a white head and something a round belly.»

It is not something one can lie about.

Something tells me someone has no idea what he's talking about... Got anything to back up this tissue of lies?

And we find that the deepest discoveries of modern physics and mathematics give hints, if not proof, that the mind of man has something about it that lies beyond the power of either physics or mathematics to describe.

If you have to lie about something to persuade someone, your product is garbage.

His whole religion is based on a rejection of Christ the Savior, but you want to post something about Obama that everyone knows is a lie?

When Santorum couldn't admit he said he didn't want to improve black people's lives by giving them other people's money, even though the tape recording, taken together with the context of what he was saying, clearly shows that he said black, then that's dishonesty, that's lying, something that his christian faith should have informed him about.

I wonder why he feels the need to lie about something like that.

How could you think we would lie about something like this?»

There are people without faith, that's ok it's up to them to believe what they want.But if you say you're a Christian at least know something about what you say your are.If you have never read the Bible at least once how can you say you're a Christian?Can you say you're a Math teacher but do not know how to add?Therein lies the point if you say you're something, know what it is you are.As it is the US is full of h

I wonder what Graham has to say about their signs that suggest they chose to stop carrying the Muppet toys because they were unsafe, something which is a blatant lie, or the fact that Chick - fil - A was caught creating fake FB accounts to post supportive comments about this issue on their corporate FB site.

People refusing medical treatment because they think they can pray disease away, The demoralizing way religion makes you feel about yourself (I am a wretch, a sinner, a bad person by nature), the religious wars that have been fought for millenia, the self righteous passing laws based on THEIR beliefs (change to the pledge of allegience which now excludes anyone who does not believe in a fairy godfather, the change to the national motto that turned it into the lie «in god we trust», the bigotry that «my religion is the right one and you are wrong so I'll pray for you» kind of crap... don't you realize that it is insulting to me when someone says they will pray for me... its the same as saying I'm going to do something for you but there won't be any effect, so it is just a waste of time.

that is the word... if we all took on the importance of our own relationship with God and actually did something about it by steping outside of the little boxes that we make or the walls that have been built up between us, we could all take off the plastic masks and realize that most of the important work for a Christian is what secretly goes on in the relationship between the believer and God... a lot of the pretence and lies would not be able to survive the truth that would be sweeping through the minds and hearts of believers.

They may tell us that in dealing with such phenomena as «religiosity» or «humanism» it is irrelevant and out of order to inquire about the «something» that lies behind them, and thereby protest against the conclusion that the only answer to all ultimate questions is the Nihil.

Here is something Einstein wrote about god — «It was, of course, a lie what you read about my religious convictions, a lie which is being systematically repeated.

Why, that would end up with something like a really old book filled with lies about how the universe started / works.

It's about being a part of something bigger than myself and working for justice, making space for God, while defeating a core lie that I still, somehow, believe about myself and, perhaps, women.

Here then is something about the tradition of faith which lies behind Jesus.

If not, I guess someone must be lying about something, methinks, and doesn't really buy his own tripe.

Don't fall into CNN or Fox Network lies, they don't care about God or your eternal salvation, just posting something so Ungodly like this is so Bad, (listen... Get close to Christ the redeemer of mankind) don't get into foolish arguments like this, Hollywood and all media is just the tipping point of the iceberg of something more evil happening, and to believers: get your doctrine straight and don't defend the works of this man (Stephen King) he is not giving glory to God with his live and work, there's many men of God that need your support that really give glory to God.

You would think the originators of this lie would eventually recognize their culpability, and feel the responsibility to do something about it, say take education seriously and set up programs that will slowly extricate everyone's claws from everyone else's throats.

They take something sacred to someone else, twist it, lie about it, then post it all over the internet.

For example, if I lied to you about something, I should come to you and confess that I lied.

I was confuse before about the meaning of satan offspring (I thought that satan gives birth to men or something) but I was told... satan offspring is people who love to do sin, like to do what the satan do... (lie, murder, pride, not doing good... etc), the sin is the work of devil.

A well known teacher in counseling, in my circles anyway, said that something like, 90 % of males masturbate and the other 10 % lie about it.

In this election, questions about both candidates» personal faith have been discussed — and whether it's publicly lying about something or just saying inflammatory things — critics of either candidate can find «moral» reasons not support the other.

When he lies, people think we all lie, when he says something stupid like the 47 % issue, it make us all look stupid, I'll tell you I don't believe like he does, this is all about Mitt right now and he will sell his soul to get the presidency.

The only thing that would help Mitt would be an electrode in his brain that would shock him when he's about to say something stupid, or a complete lie.

Or maybe you take a more active stance toward your enemies and gossip about them, spread lies about them, turn them into the police when they do something wrong, and pray that God will punish them for their wicked ways.

Last summer when I was on vacation in London I discovered something about myself, I had been lying to my taste buds for years that I did not like Indian food.

I've tried to write something about June and summer and all that goodness that lies ahead of us.

«Clarke and I have history, that involves money, lies, on one notable occasion me being interrogated by the police over something I knew nothing about... and all sorts of other stuff,» Little said.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

there is one guy on here in particular who is responsible for all of the lies that we read here, why is not something being done about his barefaced lying to us.

One thing I wish Arsenal legends to do is to write something that shows the anger of the fans about lack of spending and about lying (not revealing) to the fans about Welbeck's injury.

Its nice to see some people have open there eyes but all is true lets ask our selves have this team change from last season where are the experienced players that wenger talked about he selling us bull and every season he gets away with it the fans deserve better am from the caribbean so chance r i might never get to see arsenal live at the emirates because its too expensive at least the club should be winning things i know its important to balance the books you must BUT football is about trophies as well and thats were the balance lies how the hell can we go Six (6) seasons yes 6 without a trophy not even a FA cup or carling cup and no one says a word about the manager that is rubbish Arsenal live in the past too much the time is now this season for me is the absolute last for wenger to win something i do nt care how much money he has made the club and Wenger if you cant bring that then go work for an oil company and make them money and leave arsenal to a manager who is willing to win something not only buy players for 10 million who take 10 years to develop am frustrated with this man.