If they could only do
something about their greenhouse gas emissions, those vile bird - killing tailing ponds, and the
Not exact matches
I understand the logic of starting with the countries with the biggest
emissions of
greenhouse gases and most capacity to do
something about energy choices.
Clearly, opposition to doing
something about climate change has fallen back to a new position: claims that attempting to limit
greenhouse gas emissions would be incredibly costly.
And though, eventually, this drought will end, unless
something is done
about worldwide human
greenhouse gas emissions, these kinds of extreme events will continue to recur and worsen.
Dr. Theodore A. Scambos, a glaciologist at the National Snow and Ice Data Center at the University of Colorado, said the long life of Larsen B «makes you think there's
something particularly unusual
about this warming» — perhaps evidence that the warming has been brought on by artificial
emissions of carbon dioxide and other
greenhouse gases that trap heat in the atmosphere.
There's plenty of discussion
about climate change and
greenhouse gas emissions, but are we ready to actually do
something substantive
about reducing those
emissions?
In this era of global warming, it is inoperative, because the whole point of controlling
greenhouse -
gas emissions is to do
something about the weather.
If you listen to climate scientists — and despite the relentless campaign to discredit their work, you should — it is long past time to do
something about emissions of carbon dioxide and other
greenhouse gases.