Sentences with phrase «something about your genes»

Body Language Reveals «Empathy Gene» An empathetic nod or smile may say something about your genes as well as your heart.

An empathetic nod or smile may say something about your genes as well as your heart.

Doing this will help us identify what parts of the genome actually are protein - coding genes, but it will also tell us something about those genes» functions — a gene that is strongly expressed in a leaf, but not in flowers or root tissue, is probably important for the specific functions of leaves.

Not exact matches

Those who feel there is something «unnatural» about introducing human genes into animals or plants forget that we share a high proportion of our genes with these species already: it is precisely this collective heritage that allows experiments on frogs to spawn treatments for human cancer.

«If you get some lousy genes from your parents, you can't really fix that, and it's not easy to do something about your economic status.

I know, rationally, that she is probably just as exhausted as I am, but still, when you see a mother doing seemingly everything and you're open about your struggle to simply take a shower every day, you can start to feel like you're failing or, at the very least, missing a mom - gene or something.

«It's definitely something that we are thinking about,» said Gene Han, a vice president who heads Target's innovation center in San Francisco, where the startup pitch meeting was held.

«It says something about the Labour gene pool that all the serious candidates for the leadership are white Oxbridge - educated men in their forties who were special advisers in 1997.

«The key point here is that we can say something about how the gene acts to influence this behavior — that is, is by functioning as a chemical messenger in cells that control this behavior in the brain.

I remember looking at the report and realizing that there were all of these similar genes in all of these different animals and thinking: «Maybe a careful reading of the papers associated with the sequences most similar to mine will tell me something about my own gene.»

There were about 40 genomes of bacteria sequenced at that time, and what you could do was compare your gene of interest to other genomes to see if they contained something similar.

By doing so, they thought it should be possible to deduce the physical size of the gene (the «target») and that measuring its sensitivity to radiation might reveal something about its composition.

The article included some science - y material — something about mutant genes, «hypocretin,» and «neuropeptides.»

About half the genes in question have something to do with growth — of the placenta, the fetus, or the newborn.

Clear signals of fertility and the willingness to do something about it bring major evolutionary advantages: ripe eggs lead to healthier pregnancies, which leads to more of your genes in succeeding generations, which is what evolution is all about.

When a group of researchers in the Undiagnosed Disease Network at Baylor College of Medicine realized they were spending days combing through databases searching for information regarding gene variants, they decided to do something about it.

«The reason why this gene is interesting is because we know something about the biology of what it does and where it is expressed in the brain,» Frank said.

Yet in 2006, Shinya Yamanaka at Kyoto University in Japan reported a «crazy» experiment (Hochedlinger's word) to show that mouse skin cells in a petri dish, aided by four genes and viruses that inserted the genes into the cells» DNA, could achieve something like the newt's developmental reversal, becoming just about any cell in the mouse's body.

Something about the environment of the egg again turned on all of the genes in what had been a differentiated nucleus, reprogramming the adult DNA to its embryonic state, and the newly pluripotent cell was able to grow into a tadpole.

The genomes of bacteriodes and enterococcus reinforce something scientists have been concerned about for years: the remarkable fluidity of the bacterial gene pool.

Because the DIPG mutation always changed the same amino acid in the same location in the histone gene, Lewis knew something was special about it.

And for a vegan bodybuilder who must unfortunatelly play tetris with the food sources that he choses in order to give to his body the right ammounts of aminos, restricting SPI and soy foods so much does not make his goal any easier.There are sometimes that you need a meal thats complete with aminos and soy provides that meal with the additional benefits of lacking the saturated fats trans cholesterol and other endothelium inflammatory factors.I'm not saying that someone should go all the way to 200gr of SPI everyday or consuming a kilo of soy everyday but some servings of soy now and then even every day or the use of SPI which helps in positive nitrogen balance does not put you in the cancer risk team, thats just OVERexaggeration.Exercise, exposure to sunlight, vegan diet or for those who can not something as close to vegan diet, fruits and vegetables which contains lots of antioxidants and phtochemicals, NO STRESS which is the global killer, healthy social relationships, keeping your cortisol and adrenaline levels down (except the necessary times), good sleep and melatonin function, clean air, no radiation, away from procceced foods and additives like msg etc and many more that i can not even remember is the key to longevity.As long as your immune system is functioning well and your natural killer cells TP53 gene and many other cancer inhibitors are good and well, no cancer will ever show his face to you.With that logic we shouldn't eat ANY ammount of protein and we should go straight to be breatharians living only with little water and sunlight exposure cause you like it or not the raise of IGF1 is inevitable i know that raise the IGF1 sky high MAYBE is not the best thing but we are not talking about external hormones and things like this.Stabby raccoon also has a point.And even if you still worry about the consumption of soy... http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21711174.

Note: The film is dedicated to the late Gene Siskel, whose enthusiasm for «Kingpin» came at a crucial time for the Farrellys, encouraging them to push ahead with «There's Something About Mary.»

Bottom line, there's something a little minimalist about this dramatically promising story, and it grows harder to deny that the more sentimentality, dry spells and excessive dragging slow momentum, to the point of holding the final product shy of a rewarding state, flirted with enough by lovely scoring and visual style, some worthy story elements, strong performances - particularly that of Gene Hackman - and inspired direction to make «Bite the Bullet» a decent and sometimes gripping western drama, despite lost potential.

The one image in the movie that got the biggest response was the drawing of Gene and Roger as Laurel and Hardy, which tells you something about the universality of those characters.

Sharp's screenplays are marked by a narrative complexity and situations gravid with implication and doom.1 Take the moment in the Arthur Penn - helmed Night Moves where broken - down P.I. Harry Moseby (Gene Hackman, reuniting with Penn for the first time since Bonnie and Clyde), after discovering a body in a sunken wreck off the coast of Florida, watches as his two sleazeball hosts (John Crawford and Jennifer Warren)-- who've previously exchanged an odd nod and a knowing glance in which something is silently decided about how to handle this new, inquisitive element dropped in their midst — break into a broken tango to a tune on the radio.

Shards and slivers of information are revealed about each of them, and we learn that Isabelle was having an affair with her colleague, something Gene may have been aware of for some time.

I said, I don't think we're the royal family and we don't want to mix up the genes, but my goodness, you want something to be able to talk about.»

TheDogPress.com recently ran something about that same university discovering a gene in Rhodesian Ridgebacks that rescue human epileptics # 1 but right now I want to tell you about the lung disease research in dogs.

Being a dog owner is challenging when you realize the dog you have is running a lot of risks simply due to its genes and DNA; luckily, you can do something about it.

Mixing genes between species seemed to be about as unnatural as you can get — here was humankind acquiring too much technological power; something was bound to go horribly wrong.