Sentences with phrase «something big enough»

Something big enough to make microwave popcorn and reheat leftovers.

Many of the things we will be incorporating in the house will be made by him (bathroom vanities, new farmhouse tables, bedframes) so he needs something big enough to handle house projects and maybe a little custom side business.

Maybe it was just a letter from a few people, but I thought it would be something big enough that I would be able to find it again.

You need something big enough so these birds can stretch out while in their cage.

This way you will have something big enough to guide into the puppy's mouth when he wants to bite and tug.

It is a pretty good bet for a flea that, at ground level, something big enough to throw a shadow is going to be a moving blood meal — and the amazing spring reflex gets them onto the «feed station».

Car title loans are a good option because not everyone has something big enough like a house to offer as collateral.

I don't want a big F - 150 size truck, but I need something big enough to hold my motorcycle in the bed.

We are just a small family of 3 but, we have a dog so we wanted something big enough to separate the baby and the dog.

You want something big enough to do your rear axle if you have a flat or need to adjust your chain.

It's the question you might ask yourself at the truck - rental office right before a do - it - yourself cross-country move: You want something big enough to haul everything, but nimble enough to stay on twisty roads.

In a wide bowl (something big enough to dip the toast in) crack eggs into bowl 2 eggs will make about 3 slices of toast — 4 eggs make about 5 - 6 slices of toast... (It's almost 1 egg per slice of toast)

Do you have something big enough to boil water for pasta o rmake soup (8 quart)?

Just find something big enough to hold the potatoes with enough room on top for the topping.

What if we built something big enough to actually sock a problem?

Not exact matches

It's validation that we've performed well enough so far to be given the chance to create something really big.

Do a case study and see if what you did made a big enough splash, if not, then try something different!

Big or small, empire or not, I think we should acknowledge anyone who is brave enough to venture out and into the wide and challenging entrepreneurial world for doing something pretty darn cool.

Herjavec says at 22, he didn't dream big enough — and that's why he didn't quite understand how to channel creativity into something tangible.

Admittedly, I felt like there was something bigger than what Chicago had to offer, that Chicago wasn't forward - thinking enough and that I had outgrown it.

After seven years of working in the corporate world, one New York City - based twenty - something had a nest egg big enough to retire early.

Write down your goals, challenge yourself to see something new and constantly ask yourself if you're thinking big enough.

The perennial criticism lobbed against Silicon Valley goes something like this: Entrepreneurs aren't thinking big enough, and too many of the new start - ups being launched are really nothing more than fancy features or clones.

Recognizing that Austen Heinz was himself a victim of something beyond his control would have required a big imaginative leap, even for someone who knew enough to spot the signs.

«Sometimes even the initial discussion is enough to shake people up and say, «this is a lot bigger than I thought if it is presenting itself in the workplace,»» Dr Boyd says, but he also warns business owners that a positive response is far from universal: «Denial is something that is endemic in drug use, so it's the norm not the exception.»

So I think there's definitely a mentality in America that's a bit more about building something so it's big enough to take over the world.

Sandberg thinks that «something» is an «ambition gap» — that women do not dream big enough.

Shauna Niequest wrote, «Vulnerability happens when you're brave and start first, and when you hold a safe space and wait, when you log enough hours over time to create something really durable for that truth to tumble out onto, in a big, lovely, rich mess.»

One of my biggest issues with religion is that it teaches people that if you believe something hard enough it must be true even if facts, logic, and evidence say it isn't.

It is an acknowledgment that I need something from you, and not merely that I am big enough to give something to you.

Now being «the biggest loser» is surely something about which to be proud, but it's hardly a great enough accomplishment to really gain the deep admiration of millions of Americans.

And every time I heard that message preached, it subtly communicated something to my young heart: If it's not big and audacious, it's not good enough for God.

Any person should be able to freely express themselves sexually or non-sexually however they see fit, and not let religious rhetoric dictate, something purely natural, it's not big enough to comprehend.

I loked all over my kitchen for something to make a water bath out of that was big enough for my springform pan to fit into and was also oven safe and couldn't find anything!

When I was working at a restaurant a while back we made something similar by leaving them in the big professional ovens overnight... the pilot light was enough heat to dry them out perfectly by morning.

Something that's hearty enough to nourish us early in the a.m. and carry us past noon or until the big bird sings and more «interesting» relatives show up.

These bars are big enough to satisfy my craving for something sweet but small enough to eat as a quick snack.

People living in the Basin know very well that nature delivers big in this part of the country, with widespread and occasionally persistent flooding across the landscape — this is something that environmental water can not do because there's simply not enough of it and even if there was, it would involve unacceptable impacts on farms, towns and infrastructure.

Something large enough for a big batch of whatever vegetable healing soup recipe your mother passed down to you.

While one of my life goals is to own a chest freezer big enough to stash one of every limited edition Blue Bell ice cream flavor, right now I've got something closer to a big drawer that I call «the colder one.»

I just bought a second rhubarb plant for the garden... hoping I'll one day get a big enough crop to actually bake something with it!!!

Where an otherwise irrelevant character makes for good debate, so the news entertainment industry frames his every move as significant, and soon this irrelevant character has been news for long enough that eventually he does do something noteworthy, and he becomes the biggest story in America.

It's not good enough to be big unless you know how to use it, I think Mert mentioned something similar with Kolasinac who indeed has the temperament to use it well.

Likely a combination of all of these, but is there something else happening that I'm missing, because while Poirier and Gaethje may not be the most well known to all fans, I feel they're definitely big enough with their previous fights and the events they've been part of previously + who they've fought, to be headliners.

In the midfield, (including RWB & LWB) we have a whole bunch of tweeners... none offer the full package, none make sense in our manager's current favourite formation, except for Sead on the left and Ox on the right, and all of them have never shown any consistency for more than a heartbeat... Sead, who I'm including in this category because of our present formation, looks like a positive addition, minus his occasional brain farts, but I would rather see what he could do in a back 4 before making my mind up... Ox, who has never played better, which isn't saying much considering his largely underwhelming play in previous seasons, seems to have found a home in this new formation; unfortunately, can we really expect this oft - injured player to handle the taxing duties that come with said position over the long haul, not to mention, it looks like he has no intention of staying... Ramsey has relied on the empathy that stems from his gruesome injury years ago and the excitement that was generated a few years back when he finally seemed to put in altogether, but on the whole he has been a big disappointment (neither he nor the Ox have scored enough to warrant a regular spot)... Wiltshire should be put on a weekly contract then played until he suffers his first injury, if and when that occurs he should be shipped - out and no one should very be allowed to say his name on club grounds ever again... Elnehy & Coq are average players who couldn't make any of the top 7 teams currently in the EPL... both have showed some great energy on the pitch, but neither are top quality and no good team can afford to have that many average players on their bench playing the same position, especially with Coq's injury history / discipline concerns and Elheny's headless chicken tendencies... as for Xhaka, his tenure here so far has been incredibly underwhelming... we know he has some skills to provide the long ball but his defensive work is piss poor and he gives the ball away too cheaply and far too often... finally, the enigma himself, Ozil, so much skill with his left foot but his presence has been more frustrating than uplifting... in many respects his failure has been directly related to the failure of this club to provide him with the necessary players up front, minus Sanchez of course, and unless something drastic happens very soon his legacy will be largely a negative one (much like Wenger's)

Former representative Steve LaTourette, an Ohio Republican who now works as a Washington lobbyist, said in an interview with USA Today that the Freedom Caucus has «the ability to throw sand in the gears and keep things from happening but they are not a big enough block to make something happen.»

Make a big enough protest and instead of the headlines being «arsenal crash out of the champions league» it'll change to something about the supporters or stadium atmosphere, which should shake things up upstairs.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

and wenger is being a t ## t now you can not start the transfer window with sanchez and end it with a f» ing wellbeck i will be dissapointed if we get that desperate only big name striker now would be cavani but no point even saying it, we all know he thinks he has brought enough typical frustations for us gooners why can we challenge the big teams for the big players suarez to barca, I would of been happyt with balo liverpool, costa chelsea, if they do falcao united wich is a complete joke if he is happy going to united he would have been happier coming here with ucl and all, lewandowski bayern, its all a joke we better get a reus or something of equal measure you cant buy sanchez and place him as a striker when you need him as a winger if defeats the purpose we either get another winger or a striker.

Signing players, that has been something which has been lacking at Arsenal for a while and we have read how many articles about Wenger missing out on this player or that player who made it big because Arsenal didn't pay enough?