Sentences with phrase «something bigger lies»

The reason Mooney may be on to something bigger lies in the answer to the question: do squid have ears?

Not exact matches

It's about being a part of something bigger than myself and working for justice, making space for God, while defeating a core lie that I still, somehow, believe about myself and, perhaps, women.

... Finishing 2nd will have strengthened his beliefs even more so, that his current crop are more than capable of making a challenge... but there is a big difference in going all out to win something, rather than making up the numbers just to make a challenge and thats where Wenger's philosophy lies....

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Your tween may lie to stay out of trouble, to avoid talking to you about something, or because he or she doesn't think it's a big deal to avoid the truth.

I loved being able to lie down and nurse them together and go right back to sleep — something I continued to do until they were at least a year old and just became too big.

But there's a big difference between speculating and potentially being wrong and intentionally saying something that's a lie.

One of the biggest risks of a gym accident is tripping over something left lying around.

You just met them and you're hopeful that this might lead to something more, so you naturally don't want to assume that everything coming out of their mouth is a big fat lie right from the start.

Maybe some might think that if they are paying for something it is theirs to lie about opposed to a nice free site where they are doing you a big favor?

Considering her work on great TV like Enlightened and Big Little Lies, and classic films like Jurassic Park and Blue Velvet, Laura Dern is something of a favorite around here.

While accepting the night's first award, Nicole Kidman set the tone when she spoke about portraying a character in Big Little Lies that «represents something that is in the center of our conversation right now: abuse.

While we'd kind of love it, for insanity's sake, if the H.F.P.A. did something wild like give the prize to Jessica Biel's The Sinner, the fact is that not only will Big Little Lies likely win, but it also deserves to.

In Big Little Lies, the reader immediately knows something horrible has happened, but it takes until the end of the book to find out exactly what it is.

Hollywood stars like Nicole Kidman and Reese Witherspoon count themselves among her fans; filming for an HBO limited series of Moriarty's second U.S. bestseller, Big Little Lies, began this month.The only details available so far about her seventh novel come from Moriarty herself: In an interview she revealed that «it's about the consequences of something that happens at a neighbourhood backyard barbecue.»

A big plush bed or a pile cushions — something soft for them to lie on.

He stressed that a big part of Chaser's learning lies in something both dogs and humans excel at:

Beneath the big numbers and silliness lies the capability to take games from their context, and change them into something more accepting.

Lying, on the other hand, is directed at something bigger than you.»

... For the moment, this publication is set to be the key text of recent times that attempts to explore and present something of the work of black British artists in the late 20th Century, but herein lies its biggest difficulty.

Even though I have arrived at the beginning, I know exactly how it is going to end in two weeks» time: with fudge, compromise, and a great big lie that something useful has been achieved — followed by aching disappointment.

It is also used to coerce cooperation with the police, as they may have the accused dead to rights and can prosecute him successfully, but he's a little fish who can give intel to a big fish (this usually comes with the caveat of it being a sworn statement, so they can still prosecute you for something if you're lying... OR that the deal holds on condition that everything is factually true.

If you honestly feel that when someone asks you to be truthful about something, then you must either be lying, or lying by omission if you don't start your answer with the first instant of the big bang, your problem is not one of law.

As far as a potential impact on his kids, the much bigger problem would be if he's lying on his resume (since there's it's clearly deliberate, whereas on LinkedIn it could be user error)-- and that's something you can't / won't really be able to know.

Distinguishing something as a white lie from a big freakin» deal comes down to whether your partner would feel betrayed by the truth.

Even if you don't think it's a big deal, when the other side finds out that you lied about something relevant, it may not be able for him or her to trust your information any longer.

I think a big part of the answer lies in the fact that most of my friends are part of a strong faith community, which gave us support, confidence, strong social trust, and good marriage models, something which I blogged about here and here.

Makes me think of an old Irish pub joke told by the Irish Rovers on a CBC show waaaaayyy back in the 60's which went something like this: Mike, Sean, Patrick, Shamus and Mary have all been sitting around telling bigger and bigger lies, again, over their pints on a cold wintry night at the local pub.