Sentences with phrase «something called points»

Most mortgage issuing organizations charge not only basic application fees and closing costs but also something called points.

Not exact matches

That last point is something I'm very familiar with, as the St. Louis area (where I call home) has become home to three fast - growing startup competitions: placeholderArch Grants, the Ameren Accelerator Demo Day, and the St. Charles County Demo Day.

The Wall Street Journal won't take your calls, but trade publications, local papers, radio stations, and moderately influential bloggers may, especially when you have something different to say and a story that proves your point.

I had to call it something at some point, was going to call it «San Francisco Events».

Incidentally, the «rule of law,» broadly understood, is what makes so called «say - on - pay» rules something less than a slam - dunk from a corporate governance point of view.

Cameron points to something called the Hawthorne effect, a phenomenon identified during experiments conducted in the 1920s and 1930s at the Hawthorne Works, a factory outside Chicago.

Something like the 4 % rule, then you can again look at this, people call it the unconditional mean, the unconditional safe withdrawal rate, because I don't know what will be the conditions at that point.

But I reiterate my first point, why seek empirical answers from something that is called faith?

According to some Christian leaders at the time, all signs pointed to Christ's second coming — and with that, something called the rapture where all Christians disappear, leaving everyone else to face a host of apocalyptic disasters.

To be a disciple is to be a learner, and odds are that you will be called upon to teach something at some point in the home, church or workplace.

Course OldAdam's original post seems to be merely supporting David's cartoon, pointing out how prone we all are to putting a spin on what we say; I know I can have that problem, have even told my wife to call me out if she hears me starting to put a spin on something.

If I understood you correctly, your fourth point is this: calling something evil (from Satan) which is good (from the Holy Spirit).

It is possible the Judaizers were teaching something similar, and it may be that this is another example of where Paul is using a literary technique called epistolary diatribe to quote and refute the false teachers, but either way, Paul's point is clear.

Gravitational Singularity is only a theory at best, and what it concerns is something of this world, that is infinite gravity and density — however, they are not really infinite but because all the known Laws of Physics breakdown at that point, they call them infinite, hence a created matter, so it can not possibly be self - existent nor «First Cause.»

It would be unnecessary to labor this point except that sin is often conceived too narrowly either as something to be settled with God only, or on the other hand as merely calling for reform in human relations.

But to call the album autobiographical misses the point that Stevens himself lays out in Pitchfork's review: «It's something that was necessary for me to do in the wake of my mother's death — to pursue a sense of peace and serenity in spite of suffering... This is not my art project; this is my life.»

Dionysius did comment at one point about something he called «the omnipotent goodness of the Divine weakness,» 11 but he did not elaborate on the implications of this insight.

It would be one thing if he were calling for the entire damn state or something to bow down to Islam, but if NYC has 12 % of its population following Islam and if he's only speaking to NYC schools, I think he absolutely has a point.

This view is called «objective relativism» because, while recognizing the relativity of perspectives, it encourages every limited perspective to point beyond itself to something which is not a perspective.

I remember when the first season of Serial was at its high point that Best Buy put out a tweet referencing something about the pay phone at Best Buy — where one of the calls was supposed to have been made — in kind of a joking way.

I think I remember her, at one point, specifically calling religion «the murderer of the mind», or something similar.

If I were forced to point you to something, then you might take a look at something called New Thought Christianity.

I pointed out a lie not to long ago, so saying you're choosing not to lie is yet another lie, not to mention ignoring being called out on something.

This thinker, whose name I shall not disclose, said that he was becoming more and more convinced that there was «something in the older metaphysical — he called them «ontological» — claims; at the moment he was much concerned, he said, to find a way of giving more than linguistic status to such propositions as «personal God», for it appeared to him that these statements somehow pointed to a truth about the universe, about the nature of things, that must be reckoned with in any honest description of the «way things are».

«At precisely those points of urgent need... Paul is most conscious that he is writing as one authorized, by the apostolic call he had received from Jesus Christ, and in the power of the Spirit, to bring life and order to the church by his words... This is not to say that the writers of the New Testament specifically envisaged a time when their books would be collected together and form something like what we now know as the cannon.

Hebrews maintains the continuity between Old and New Testaments by pointing out both Aaron and Christ owe their priesthood to God's call; it's not something they take upon themselves.

It has often been pointed out that most of the so - called books of the New Testament were not carefully wrought literary works, but something more in the nature of tracts, written to meet a special situation or a particular need.

I support Wenger but not because I am a «fanboy» but because I believe in his values, I disagree with a lot he has done, and maybe he should leave the club to pave way for fresh ideas, but the point I was trying to make is that we can still turn this season into something we can be proud of, if we don't then come June I expect that we will (respectively) call for change and it will be our duty to make the board listen, but June is still a half a season away.

Thanks for pointing out that there is something called in game management.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

How do you call yourself chimchimgiroud??? not surprised that you think that we don't need another striker because our messi will bag them in for fun... there is something called form mate and when ones hits it, its not advisable to bench or alternate him so one will obviously warm the bench for a long time but your chamberlain point is point on....

For a while Botham, as if hypnotized, went along with all this, and at one point it seemed that he would indeed land a film part, albeit one as a psychopathic killer, in something called The Perpetrator, a Ramboesque movie which, in fact, was never to be made.

KEY FACT: Southampton have won seven and drawn the other of their eight Premier League home matches against Crystal Palace MATCH ODDS: Southampton Evs Draw 5/2 Palace 16/5 bet365 Pick: Draw @ 5/2 ANDY SAYS: A tough game to call, but I think Palace will get something... 1 - 1 GRAEME SAYS: I firmly believe Palace will be getting the three points here... 0 - 2 SILKY SAYS: I can see this playing out as a draw... 1 - 1 FOOTBALLIndex — One to follow: Christian Benteke at 88p, has dropped outside the top - 200

Bill Connelly used to use something called Adjusted POE (points over expected), but he's concluded that it isn't as useful as once believed and has swapped Adj. POE out for Highlight Yards and Opportunity Rate.

No 4/5 ANDY SAYS: Close game here but I have to go for the home side to land the three points... 2 - 1 GRAEME SAYS: I can see Burnley getting something here, maybe not the win but at a draw... 2 - 2 SILKY SAYS: Tough call, but Southampton should have enough for the win... 2 - 1 FOOTBALLIndex — One to follow: Virgil van Dijk still looks a very good buy at just over # 1.50

KEY FACT: Everton are unbeaten in each of their last six Premier League matches against Crystal Palace MATCH ODDS: Everton 13/10 Draw 9/4 Palace 13/5 bet365 Pick: Half time score 0 - 0 @ 6/4 ANDY SAYS: Close call but I think my former side can get something from this game... 1 - 1 GRAEME SAYS: Everton need a win here and I think they will just about get it... 2 - 1 SILKY SAYS: Everton will take the three points here for me... 2 - 0 FOOTBALLIndex — One to follow: Wilfried Zaha just inside the top - 100, well worth a look

I remember one day being absolutely shocked when my then - five - year - old boy pointed to something (I forget what now, but I remember that it was pink) and called it «A GIRL TOY — it's not for BOYS, Mommy!»

Getting to the point, after I had Toby and was ready and needing to return to work I discovered something called a nursing cover which I found invaluable when feeding him in public.

The conspiracy theorist living inside my brain says we can expect to see more of this type of «journalism», followed by calls on the school officials to DO SOMETHING because IT IS FOR THE CHILDREN»S SAFETY and IF WE LET THE PARENTS SEND LUNCHES TO SCHOOL THEN CHILDREN WILL DIE!!!!!!!! (note the many, many exclamation points — that means this is a REALLY IMPORTANT POINT Y ’ ALL), followed by local school officials implementing policies to BAN CHILDREN FROM EATING FOOD BROUGHT IN FROM «OUTSIDE» and mandate that they eat, instead, the lunch provided by the school.

old son leaves his dirty clothes in the bathroom after his bath, I'll call him to the bathroom and either point to them, or let him know that he forgot something (as I'm pointing to them).

Names do not stay unusual for long, particularly if a celebrity joins the party, so parents have to keep raising the bar if they want their child to be called something that won't be forgotten in a hurry (or, from the grandparents» point of view, can't be spelt, pronounced or taken seriously!)

«The audacity of him saying, I can't get a budget passed because something might happen six months from now with a federal budget is called kick the can, point a finger, place blame.

My point is, being able to vote for someone will cause something called voters dishonesty.

«I think the right honourable gentleman ought to do something more useful than just read the newspapers,» Cameron observed, before pointing out that shadow justice secretary Sadiq Khan had called the sentencing approach a «perfectly sensible vision».

Continuing with your rather odd digression (and worrying failure to grasp the point), but happy to move onto something more light - hearted, the terminology of the British Isles outside of international rugby, that is what they are still called is (quaintly and elegantly, in my opinion) rife with curiosities arising from our colourful history.

«I believe that in a democracy, everybody should participate, and I don't see how you call something a democracy when you don't give everybody that opportunity to participate,» said Queens Councilman Daniel Dromm, Mark - Viverito's point - person for non-citizen voting.

Now that by it — so what I've said up to this point isn't so shocking because in Shakespeare's plays you often have characters who are in some sort of a pickle and they call on the gods to do something.

He creates a real number, called p, by the following rule: make the digit n places after the decimal point in p something other than the digit in that same decimal place in rn.

If you really need to call about something else, at another point in the process, do.

That particular balance might be called the bricycle point, something that needs to be avoided for narrow - track vehicles to take to the streets.