Again, his motives were no more likely to be mixed than the preacher who wants to make sure these people teaching
something different understand that their definition is different and his (or the church's) is right.
Not exact matches
I can
understand why there might be questions about
something new that's
different, but we've really tried to do it from the point of view of the publishers, and we believe that we can create an environments that's actually really great for the publishers, really great for the readers, and also really great for the advertisers.
She might have said
something like, «I can
understand why people who have been struggling might blame people from
different countries, or those who have
different beliefs from their own.
To be a C.E.O. or other top executive, said Guy Berger, an economist at LinkedIn, «you need to
understand how the
different parts of a company work and how they interact with each other and
understand how other people do their job, even if it's
something you don't know well enough to do yourself.»
I am a christian and I like to believe I have an
understanding of more religions than just my own and why someone may believe
something different than me.
Just believing
something because you are to naive to know better (i.e. a child believing in Santa) is very
different from a person studying their religion, coming to truly
understand it, and choosing to believe it.
Understood in this way, a family is
something quite
different from a political community, and the language of «rights» — which, in my own view, has served us well in the political sphere — is peculiarly unable to capture the texture of family life.
There is
something very powerful about pulling up a seat to the table across from someone who has a
different interpretation, a
different lifestyle, a
different belief all together, and just saying, «My aim here is not to be heard and to be right, my aim is to listen to you and try to
understand you.»
So if Vikings came and plundered my village, I would not hate all Vikings and the moment I see Vikings doing good in the name of Odin, then I would have to be mature and come to the
understanding that Scripture and belief can mean
something different to
different people.
She had apparently got to the point where she honestly did not know that a child is the natural fruit of a union between a man and a woman: in her
understanding «sex» is
something done for pleasure, according to one's desires, whether lesbian or homosexual or whatever, and procreation an entirely
different matter connected with options presented at various times, possibly involving in - vitro fertilization and test - tubes.
In any case it is
something profoundly
different from what would be traditionally
understood by a doctrine of women's experience.
Now, I read some online articles that have discussed this idea, and I
understand that people will think scholars are trying to get the Bible to say
something different than what it actually says.
But even if Thomas's physiology is (from our perspective) wobbly, we can acknowledge that he is again on to
something:
understanding (for instance) colours is
different from sensing colours.There is a sort of distance which would not be there if the operation of the intellect were tied essentially to a physical organ.
Jesus, to me, was a very poetic speaker and his meaning to words such as wife probably mean
something different than our current
understanding of our wife at home.
If we do have an
understanding of the conversation then the definitions of these «packed» concepts are subjective and we wind up debating terms like «following Jesus» which means
something entirely
different to me than it did to my 92 year old grandmother.
Having said that, I
understand different people have
different needs to help them know when
something is accomplished.
But according to Smith and Denton, teens
understand religion to be
something quite
different: religion helps them make good life choices and helps them to feel happy.
(For instance, on the very day on which I write this page, the post brings me some aphorisms from a worldly-wise old friend in Heidelberg which may serve as a good contemporaneous expression of Epicureanism: «By the word «happiness» every human being
understands something different.
I criticized the thinkers of the Enlightenment because not only do they mean
something different by «nature» than the classical thinkers do, but they throw away most of their equipment for
understanding it.
But the eyes that saw him as a person saw one thing; their spirit
understood something different.
I don't
understand why so many people are claiming discrimination because someone believes
something different than they do.
Just like you brought out
something different to help me
understand Rom.
For as soon as
something passes into someone else's hands, it is marked by their character, by their usage; it has become
something different in a sense, insofar as the gift - giving succeeds in establishing
understanding between giver and recipient.
More than once I've found that as I've sought
understanding about
something Father brought clarity by shifting my focus to a
different perspective.
The end of the process is not, therefore,
understanding as it is in the instance of all propositional truths but is rather «becoming»
something different than one was.
To
understand other persons will require
different sets of abilities depending on whether our objective is to be their friends, sell them
something they don't really need, or command them in the heat of battle.
Professor Meilaender believes that Wilson is
something of a confused relativist whose view of the moral life is not that
different from the
understanding of Richard Rorty.
But of the importance of the subject I have not the slightest doubt; and as you will see, this is not because I wish to cling in some obscurantist way to
something that has been traditionally sacred, but because I am convinced that death, judgement, heaven, and hell — «the four last things» — are subjects with which we must concern ourselves, however
different from our ancestors may be the way in which we wish to
understand what those terms denote.
«They're traditionally
different than our generation, and what turns them on is
something our age group is working to
understand,» Weigel adds.
He proved me wrong for wanting to see
something different for that game even though I expected him to play
understanding also that he was next in line so deserved his game time.
I still don't
understand people's obsession with boxing players in to a specific role... The whole «true DM» is a dying breed, even Coquelin is arguably
something else considering the advanced positions he takes up often in front of Santi and takes major risks in winning the ball back for us... IMO, the reason Coquelin has had such a successful integration into the first team is that he focussed incredibly hard on the basics of his role first and foremost before adding other elements to his game (long - balls, driving runs into space, more aggressive ball movement in general) it's not rocket science to tell a player to curb the attacking side of their game and focus primarily on defence before attack... Nor is it that hard to see that playing in a midfield pairing with either Ramsey or Cazorla is going to be
different as well.
So next time you talk about what we «deserve» be sure to know our history and
understand that this 2015 discussion would in all probability be
something very low - key and uninspirational if history had been
different and Dein had not signed up a little known French manager in September 1996.
Some of the comments made by our great manager this month have been really laughable BUT i expected nothing
different as he will not sign anyone of note AS USUAL!!!!! The Yaya Sanogo signing looks even more ridiculous in the gran scheme of things BUT that's wenger for you, i also hope he has a conscience and
understands that we need to win
something this year and if not the league title then we must at least finish second NOT 3rd OR 4th to show some improvement anythingt other than that and he should not renew his contract.
Weaning may seem like
something important is coming to an end, when in reality, it just means that your baby is learning how to develop his or her tastes and self - feeding experience while
understanding more about
different types of nutrition.
Your child may benefit from the opportunity to
understand better what is happening — chances are he has noticed that
something was
different.
«Promoting dialogue and
understanding between people of
different backgrounds and beliefs is
something we could all support, if it is truly inclusive.
«I want those individuals to
understand that you have an obligation because people are going to be looking to you, to say
something different, to say
something in addition to what is already being said,» McLaughlin said.
We
understood that it was a case of leave or remain, and a lot of people considered this to mean that we either had more of the same or
something different.
Anyone should be free to publish any new ideas / research which gives a
different viewpoint on
something which we do not yet fully
understand.
How ocean sounds affect
different marine species «is
something we are only just beginning to
understand,» says Greg Early, associate scientist with the Edgerton Research Lab.
The idea that you might someday
understand something is
different from actually
understanding it, or even knowing the right questions to ask.
«The flexibility of the jays» reactions in
different social situations, and the use of these tactics across
different sensory domains [sight and sound] supports the notion that the jays have
something like a theory of mind — an
understanding of others» points of view,» says Lisa Leaver, a behavioral ecologist at the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom who was not involved in the study.
Though they don't fully
understand what caused the
different outcomes at the two sites, Weatherhead speculated it had
something to do with Clyde River's proximity to Baffin Bay, and the influence of weather patterns that develop over the oceans.
«We spent a lot of time
understanding how a leaf works,» Daniel Nocera says, «and then built
something that looks totally
different but operates in the same way.»
So this experimental work seems to suggest we really do have this deep nonlocality to the universe, which means that the universe is a much weirder place than Einstein would have liked, and it's
something with a lot of
different sorts of profound implications for
understanding the universe at a quantum level.
«The fact that you need all of these binding domains is
something we still don't quite
understand, and the observed pH - dependent conformational change is quite
different from what happens in mammalian FcRn, where a chemical titration controls binding,» said Bjorkman.
This is
something that we in the developmental and scientific community refer to as comparative biology — comparing
different systems to
understand an aspect of biology.
These
different areas form, I believe, building - blocks that contribute to our
understanding of how our remarkable nervous system makes us do all the things we enjoy - and sometimes those that we would prefer not to - and occasionally make wise decisions...
something that our brains, however, could be better at [and where there is] room for further biological evolution.
Canines may not
understand that this new scent of your skin and breath is caused by a developing baby, but they will know that
something is
different with you — which might cause them to be more curious or attentive.
I totally
understand wanting to know when
something is going to happen, and I try to figure out timing for events sometimes using many
different methods.