This is
something even a person who's never trained in his or her life can do.
Not exact matches
They're dulling us in the process to the real world and real
people around us, making us blind to anything outside our own orbits, blind
even, say, to
something like a young man on a train wielding a 45 - calibre pistol.
«If they eventually use this cash for
something else, like investing in their own company or investing in other
people's companies — not in stocks, but an actual company — then it's as optimal as investing in the stock market, or perhaps
even moreso.»
In 2012, David Puttnam, Ireland's then Digital Champion, wrote in Views of the Future, Dangers and Opportunities that: «Learning is no longer
something that needs to happen within particular hours, in a particular place, or
even with a particular group of
people.»
It's
something people wanted —
even if they didn't know they wanted it.
I realize that they're a necessary evil, but you need to be very careful that you're not saying things or doing things (
even worse) to «prove»
something to these
people because (a) it's never enough to satisfy them in any case and they won't believe you anyway; and (b) it's a fool's errand to waste your time trying to impress
people whose livelihood is much more about finding the warts and shortcomings in your story than in celebrating your successes.
One of the most exciting things about studying Musk and other breakthrough innovators is that it reveals that
even though these
people often have special, difficult - to - imitate abilities or traits, the mechanisms by which these abilities and traits lead to innovation are often
something we can tap ourselves.
Six months after the Halifax trip, she quit her job and poured all her energy into figuring out how to sell
something people didn't
even know they wanted — at least, not yet.
Even if it's just a chance to win
something small like a gift card or early access to the new feature, it will make a huge difference in the number of
people who actually participate.
And I think that I want to listen to
people's ideas
even more, because I want to understand why they say
something.
People want to see, touch, and sometimes
even taste
something before they buy it.
TV, movies, popular songs and
even people tell us if we're not happy, there's
something wrong.
Are they about how long they had to wait, had to talk to too many
people, the price, «your website says one thing but you say
something else», «you say it's easy to do business and I can't
even get a price», «I didn't know about your warranty», «you don't know what you're talking about» — right?
Inconsistency between your words and your facial expression causes
people to sense that
something isn't right and they begin to suspect that you're trying to deceive them,
even if they don't know exactly why or how.
Extra testing often means
people notice
something that prompts follow - up tests and potentially treatment,
even when there is nothing wrong with them.
We might be one of the smallest subsidiaries, with 20 - some
people at the head office and 60 - some
people across the country, versus
something like 1,200 in the U.S.. We're not involved in product development at all or in the management of licensing, so we don't work with third - party software developers or
even license merchandise goods like T - shirts and stuff like that.
«It may very well be that in some
people — or all of us, some of the time — the network sustains its activity
even when the
people, in their conscious minds, go on to
something else,» says Posner.
It tells
people you are not sure about
something, or you're
even an unsure
person.
Doing
something like this does also comes with risks for overdiagnosis,
even if the research is successful; a regular test for cancer risks causing many
people to receive potentially dangerous treatment for cancers that wouldn't have seriously impacted their health in the long run, according to José Baselga, Physician - in - Chief and Chief Medical Officer of Memorial Sloan Kettering.
Even if you sell
something mundane (e.g., toasters) or seemingly intangible (e.g., back - end technology), put the focus on how it can touch
people's lives.
I've noticed
something interesting in these discussions:
Even though there's universal agreement that business success is centered around finding the right employees, many leaders use a data - centric approach — rather than a
people - centric approach — to operating their companies.
They excel at turning a boring presentation into
something people will talk about in the hallway and
even on the ride back to the office.
Most
people are afraid to invest in
something that hasn't been proven,
even though my buy - in was relatively small.
As Carnegie put it, «
Even people with only mediocre speaking ability may make superb talks if they will speak about
something that has deeply stirred them.»
But if you insist on slicing the salami ever thinner and if you're intent on building the next luxury linen outlet just for little
people or
something even more exotic and esoteric, ask yourself these three questions first:
Only a handful of
people will
even dare to try
something new.
This is not really
something that you can expect
people to undertake just in the
evenings or on weekends.
When
something happens that «stresses you out,» the reality is, it's probably not that bad in comparison to the many
people who struggle daily to put food on the table, or to
even have a job or career.
In other words, you have to show that
even paying the minimums would prevent you from maintaining a minimum standard of living,
something that's extremely difficult for the average
person to do.
Refocusing our sights on precision health won't be easy — because it involves achieving
something more elusive
even than a technological leap or a breakthrough in biological understanding: It demands a wholesale re-thinking: We have to convince and train
people to be proactive instead of reactive when it comes to their own health.
So,
even though it may seem that having a short supply of
something or allowing only a small group of
people in on a product will hurt your sales, in reality it helps.
Trustworthy
people will listen to and support you
even when they don't need
something from you.
That a Fortune 15 corporation would send
even one
person to such an event says
something about the stakes involved in litigation targeting companies in the opioid supply chain.
Most
people have a least a few jobs before they find their perfect career, and your perfect job is probably
something you haven't
even figured out yet.
«Sometimes
even the initial discussion is enough to shake
people up and say, «this is a lot bigger than I thought if it is presenting itself in the workplace,»» Dr Boyd says, but he also warns business owners that a positive response is far from universal: «Denial is
something that is endemic in drug use, so it's the norm not the exception.»
But research has shown that forcing
people to feel positive for
something they're unsure about can actually «highlight how unhappy they are» and, ultimately, will make them
even more depressed.
Remember,
people aren't logging into Facebook during the day to be sold on
something; they are likely looking to relax, connect, or
even be entertained, but not held hostage by marketers gone crazy.
Even when we seem like complete opposites, there is usually
something we can agree on with the
person we're speaking with.
And there's a reason to hope that Ballmer is onto to
something and
people still do care deeply about facts,
even if we all have different opinions about what to do about them.
«
Even with quarterly reviews
people can be caught off - guard with
something that's built up,» she says.
His data, which was compiled from 650,000 real time reports from more than 15,000
people, showed that
people are significantly less happy when they let their minds wander, compared to when they focus on what they're currently doing,
even if what they're doing is
something mundane like commuting.
«And yet
even when
people are thinking about
something neutral, they're still considerably less happy than when they're not mind - wandering at all.
When hundreds, or
even thousands of
people share
something you've written, that response establishes you as someone who can be trusted.
Republican and democrat, there's
something about steel,
even though the
people that use steel to fabricate products is a multiple of maybe 20 of those that manufacture steel.
Basically, it's hard to coordinate
people in the absence of a boss (or leader or
something),
even when they all value the common goal.
The day of the race,
even at the qualifying event, when you saw all of these
people getting there cars kind of working, you could really feel there was
something special about «Wow, it would be really cool if a car could show up and drive somewhere.»
To be a C.E.O. or other top executive, said Guy Berger, an economist at LinkedIn, «you need to understand how the different parts of a company work and how they interact with each other and understand how other
people do their job,
even if it's
something you don't know well enough to do yourself.»
And yet last week, given an opportunity to tweak their bill before final passage, to make it
something the American
people might like a little better, the main change Republicans made was to lower the top tax rate — the rate paid by the richest Americans —
even more.
Maybe, just maybe it would be ok if someone was working on a technical problem such as a car, computer or
something that was not directed at you (the
person himself) maybe, no not
even then... Certainly not a customer who you want to come back and see you... Why
even taking the chance to insult a
person... I'm on a mission to kindly tell
people not to say «no problem» because it may reflect on there tip... So I give them choice & hopefully a good tip... Really folks, its just good common sense.
I have met some of the most incredible
people at my studio who hold me accountable and make class
something to look forward to,
even 2 years later.