Sentences with phrase «something everyone likes»
It's not something everyone likes to talk about, but sometimes you've got to be a little uncomfortable in order to fix the issue.
https://www.azhealthyfamilies.org/
It's something everyone likes and it's inexpensive to feed a lot of people and quick and easy to make.
There's something everyone likes, and when the kids are happily eating their dinners, I'm happy too.
making something everyone likes, and the 2nd making something healthy that everyone likes.....
Not exact matches
Doing something new will not be welcomed by everyone who likes the status quo.
Something like a mock webinar or online game that gets everyone involved is a great way to get the team working together.
It, in essence, treats the internet as a public utility — that is, something everyone in America needs, like electricity or running water.
«Everyone feels like they have some ownership in the goal, as opposed to [the CEO acting as] a dictator mandating something.»
«I like the show because there is a huge emphasis on family, and that's something just about everyone can relate to,» says Minnesotan Josh Dykhuis.
It feeds the team because everyone likes to be part of something positive.
«It was more like you did it because you found something that spoke to you and you found like - minded people and you were all weirdos, everyone were kind of outcasts.»
«There's no point doing something that looks like everyone else's,» he said.
Everyone is wondering how they could even suggest something like that.
«Starting a business is like nurturing a sports talent» (referring to something I know everyone has done).
A new, improved version of something everyone already likes can be a wonderful idea for a new business, or so you'd think.
People who make a great first impression listen closely to everyone, and they make all of us, regardless of our position or social status or «level,» feel like we have something in common with them.
While Lincoln has become something of a bustling hub for Midwestern startups, semiannual trips there might not sound like everyone's idea of a fantasy perk.
Seems like there needs to be, because the most important rule of rebranding is something like, «Don't choose everyone's third - favorite option.
But Rhei works because Stanković applies electromagnetism and ferrofluid with a fresh, artistic take to something everyone uses today, creating an entirely new standard for what a clock is supposed to look like and do.
«I'd just like to have something that's planned and everyone knows where they fit into that plan.»
But it seems like everyone — including the president's defenders and even the man himself — are operating as if Trump is guilty of something.
In an industry where the life cycle of a binary broker or binary option robot goes something like «Grand Introduction to the market — On the news for all of 5 seconds — hundreds of traders go online to complain of foul play (or rather futuristic miracles where money disappear from their accounts in mind boggling speed)-- the complaints get louder and everyone takes note — broker closes after mass trader exodus», that 240ptions has lasted that long is absolutely commendable.
«The consortium of 40 + banks (known as R3cev) which aims to do just that will inevitably develop something which: is permissioned (for users and developers like the apple app store), privatized, has fees, will not be entirely transparent to everyone, will not be open - source, it will definitely be inflationary to accommodate monetary policy of debasement and fractional reserve schemes, it will facilitate negative interest rates, central control of accounts for suspension / freezing of funds, bail - ins, bail outs, capital controls and transactions will include the identity of both sender and receiver and store that information in a centralized location for the convenience of hackers.»
This just seems like good, old fashioned, common sense to me, but it is something that everyone should consider.
Considering their low correlation and superior performance (higher profit margins and return on equity) to the sputtering tech sector that have been pushing this market to new highs, and the more than 70 publicly traded names, it seems like there's something on the menu for everyone.
I like that this tool uses Excel, since Excel is something that pretty much everyone knows how to use.
The Church should feel something like an Irish pub — festive, music, participatory — with everyone welcome.»
They want to be treated the same as everyone else, and people like you think they want something special.
A panel in Times Square that said «Atheist Fund for Hunger Remediation» — or something like that, would be better for everyone.
They thought it could look like he actually did something (because he has done little other than to disrupt, spend and tax the H out of everyone).
I'm fine with a church using it or something else like that but to put it in a memorial without recognizing everyone else who lost their lives is wrong.
Or should such a course be called something like «Why My Religion Is The Truth And Everyone Else is an Immoral Heathen»?
Its an educated thing, those who are uneducated and ignorant will classify everyone on something like that.
God has left everything for the final day and everyone will get something no matter we believe in it or not so over time we develop a kind of fearlessness (no fear of God) because He is not following us in an unmarked car like a cop and this freedom we use in a wrong way.
Oh sure, they contribute everytime there's a natural dissaster or something, but have an abortion... they ain't going to be around to help you through the emotional issues you have afterwards, because none of them actually «walk with God», they simply use him to validate their biases against everyone they're uncomfortable with or don't like.
Especially in a city this big and in the swirl of social media, it's easy to feel like everyone else has something better going on.
I would like everyone consider something that is growing in this country that has already occurred in Canada a Law that is passed by making it a criminal offense to use the bible against any sexual orientation.
Everyone wishes there was a sweet afterlife, but something like that doesn't just happen on it's own like creation of the universe does.
I see Chad is busy pigeon - holing everyone else's choices — like a substitute teacher handing out an over-simplified multiple choice quiz on something they are unfamiliar with.
Everyone does something in their life that they know is sin but do anyway because they still like it, including people insistent on your philosophy and that they themselves don't regularly do things they like that are sinful.
The reasoning goes something like this: The state ensures that everyone's needs are met, so that people can pursue such human goods as friendship and love, chess and gymnastics.
While you're in the other room reading Jane Eyre and everyone around the TV starts screaming, just shout something like, «Pass interference?!
would everyone be ok if after the buildings fell someone found something that looked just like popular depictions of the devil among the rubble and decided it needs to be displayed?
If you really want to convert people to your beliefs (or if you're god, if you want everyone to believe in you), I'd think that doing something grand and spectacular like that would be a great way to do it...
It looks like a case of hedging one's bets and hoping that out of the process will emerge a new vision of the Church, neatly packaged with something to please everyone.
So when something goes wrong — when they fail to meet expectations, there's a breakdown in a relationship or a sharp theological dispute that causes a rift, it can be hard to remember that they're just like everyone else.
Faith is something you must have for an instance such as Jesus showing up and dying for sins, because everyone there at the time, is dead, and only words describing what happened are left, words that match hidden prophecy given to those that don't believe the one dying (the Jews don't believe Jesus)... which is self proving in a hidden manner... like finding gold where someone says it will be, near another person that says it's absolutely not there.
I am tolerant of everyone's beliefs, but don't try to force them on me or whine about it when someone does something you don't like.
The problem with that is that not everyone is wired to be able to take something like this on faith.
I guess personally I keep coming back to the simplest or lowest common denominator, namely, if any one person, being or God wanted to accomplish something like having everyone believe something the easiest, best thing to do is make it clear cut, not ambiguous or open to interpretation.