Sentences with phrase «something nothing less»

She is without a doubt, the very best in blog land at buying the piece that no one else would want and turns it into something nothing less than stunning.

Not exact matches

Honorable CEOs recognize that it is unfair to expect employees to give them something for nothing or for less than what their labor is worth.

He is being driven by something larger than himself, and it is nothing less than his whole Catholic faith, whether he always chooses it or not.

So according to you because nothing can be «proven» we should all believes in something that can be less proven than our basic reality.

For me, any religious system that gives or promises to give peace of mind is idolatrous; the price we pay for «peace of mind» will be nothing less than the sacrifice of something basic to our own humanity.

«god exists because he always has, duh» is in no way less stupid than your earlier assumption that atheist believe something came from nothing.

Less spectacular but safer are the many legitimate ways of getting something for little or nothing.

Krauss» fallacious account of how something can come from nothing, though presented as a great breakthrough, and praised as such by Dawkins in his afterword, is largely a rehash of ideas already put forward by Hawking, Mlodinow, and some less eminent physics popularizers.

To swear in something not proven, is nothing less than a lie, no matter how accepted by culture... and such lying faith logic is often the eventual cause of mental illnesses.

The middle paragraph deals with the historical facts of Christ, but with something else too — namely, the relation of Christ to God, so there can be no mistake among Christians as to the major insistence of all Christian experience, that when we meet Christ we meet nothing less than God Himself.

Besides several teams who have questions surrounding one or possibly two players, there is no squad that has so many issues heading into the final week of the transfer window... even Monaco, who have lost numerous players from their starting 11 have less controversy swirling in and around their club and they have champion's league play to contend with this season... just think of how ridiculous this situation is especially considering that we have had the same manager for over 20 years... no team should be better organized than ours... if nothing else, that should be the one advantage this team holds over all others, yet the exact opposite has occurred... this fact is even more disturbing considering the main argument against removing Wenger from his managerial position was that there was no suitable replacement and that people feared some sort of perceived drop - off if a new manager was brought into the mix... based on what we've witnessed since the time of his contract renewal a monkey with a magic eight ball could have done an adequate job... I hate to make jokes, in light of our current dilemma, but this team is so screwed up if I don't laugh about it, the only plausible response is to either cry or do something incredibly destructive... just look around this squad and try to see what our delusional manager sees that allow him to make such positive statements about our current team

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

Less stress, more time at my disposal and nothing so far has indicated that I have missed something.

He started training diligently (in his own way, of course) for that moment when he would become the best in the world at something, for his was — and is — the kind of ego that demanded nothing less.

I ask for nothing less than a REVOLUTION - something that will transform the social and...

In addition to that, you can focus more on the foreplay, this is something that grabs your attention into the magic of sex and makes you nothing less than an animal who is eager to make it happen with her partner.

This game have some mediocre graphics, and the gameplay is nothing special, it is trying to be something new and exciting, but falls more or less flat.

When your biggest problem is that the cast is so uniformly terrific that the greatest complaint you have is some don't get enough screen time, you know you have something quite special, and, having sat with the film for several months now, it feels like nothing less than «The Godfather» of espionage movies.

It's that time when we've more or less gotten everything we have to say about the Oscars out of our cynical systems and, cruelly, we have to say something, anything, about the two categories that Eric Henderson and I want absolutely nothing to do with.

wins Best Picture, it's possible George Miller could sneak the Director prize, which would not only be a wonderful example of the Academy getting it right, which doesn't happen often enough, but a great case that style and prowess can still mean something even if the subject matter isn't classically «Academy Worthy» (and nothing is less «Academy Worthy» than the Doof Warrior).

If Spotlight wins Best Picture, it's possible George Miller could sneak the Director prize, which would not only be a wonderful example of the Academy getting it right, which doesn't happen often enough, but a great case that style and prowess can still mean something even if the subject matter isn't classically «Academy Worthy» (and nothing is less «Academy Worthy» than the Doof Warrior).

We wanted something bespoke: a resource that gave us exactly what we needed, nothing more, nothing less.

This is something in the educational policy arena that we also call «symbolic policies,» whereas nothing really instrumental or material is happening, and everything else is a facade, concealing a less pleasant or creditable reality that nothing, in fact, has changed.

In any case, Obama and Duncan owe our children nothing less than to do something other than continue this waiver gambit.

The handling limitations we discovered are nothing less than we'd expect with a car with such a short wheelbase and tall profile - and not something that can really change without the car no longer being a two - seat, 2.7m - long city car.

lol, that's only true if you went from a performance v6 or something to a Prius, and has nothing to do with the transmission and everything to do with the fact that the engine is more fuel efficient but has less power.

So it came as something of a shock to re-acquaint myself with this gutsy little car, and a lesser shock to realise that with the demise of Volkswagen's Golf 118 TSI, there's nothing much around to compare with this particular Alfa.

In short, regardless of the medium an individual produces something in, they are composers: nothing more and nothing less.

While embargoes and strictly enforced publication dates are nothing new in the book world, Stephen King is trying something a little less common to generate excitement about his next novel, Under the Dome (which I gave a sneak preview of here).

Keywords are really nothing more or less than the terms that people use when they are searching for something.

I certainly don't have it all figured out, but I believe that doing something, even some of the things I've found less effective, is better than doing nothing.

Essentially, debt settlement companies may instruct you to withhold any future payments on your account, purportedly to eventually motivate the creditor in question to accept less than what is owed under the principle that «something is better than nothing.»

Any change in behavior that is constant such as urinating more, drinking more water, urinating less, and trying to urinate but nothing comes out (this is a serious dangerous clinical sign of urinary obstruction — see vet immediately), hiding, wanting to be by his or herself when normally very social, (a big sign in cats if something is wrong), off balance, overall weakness, eating less or more than usual, painful crying out.

A recent study adds to a growing body of literature that should put to rest, once and for all, the false notion that dogs in shelters are in shelters because there is something wrong with them: «Nothing in the prevalence estimates we reviewed suggest that overall, dogs who come to spend time in a shelter (and are not screened out based on history or behavior at intake or shortly thereafter) are dramatically more or less inclined toward problematic warning or biting behavior than are pet dogs in general.»

Two maybe three years ago I bought a bag of Chicken Jerky at Cost - Co thinking it would be a healthy treat for my Pug, after eating these treats I noticed he Mugsy would drink water like he could not get enough... Then one night he kept coming to me with his ears laid back and hanging with a look in his eye that I knew something was wrong, went to my daughters house as she is really into dogs and hoping she could figure it out, well she noticed he could not pee no matter how much he tried, so rushed him to the vet, thank God, had I waited he would have died as his bladder was full of crystals and was near rupturing, anyway the vet catheterized him after putting him under anesthesia as it was so painful, after all was said and done and $ 1, ooo.oo later, he ended up on a special diet which we kept him on for well over a year... decided to try a good, but less expensive dog food, had his urine checked and he was doing fine... I believe it was the chicken jerky and the salt content, but of course I can not be sure and I do not remember the brand... Thankfully he has had no more occurrences, needless to say he does not get chicken jerky anymore and definitely nothing from China at least not that I know of.

Just a few minutes in the waiting room with nothing bad happening (no shots) can make for a less stressful visit when you do need to come in for something less pleasant.

I saw the «war perfected» tv spot at least once a night through late february / early march on various channels later in the evening... it is definitely a matter of the playstation 3's current owner base... and a little less on advertising than a lot of people make it out to be... and its not just advertising; but largely word of mouth... something that killzone as a franchise simply doesn't have yet... but in the end I simply don't know why anyone would care... the game is still brilliant, easily the best looking game of this generation so far... with a multiplayer component that implemented new mechanics that will become standard across the board... and with plans of tons of future DLC, some free, some not... the game will only get better from here... damn it though I just want GG to get the server lobby right... nothing has been delivered yet on what that douche bag producer kyle guy told us would be there... playing with 2 or 3 friends is easy... playing with 8 non clan members in a full 32 player server is as easy as chewing on your own elbow...

EVERYONE picks the second option because the first option is simply less fun, it's so much better to run into something and make mistakes and build your own understanding of the mechanics than to have them drilled into your brain beforehand so there's nothing to discover on your own.

A third time line, actually i was thinking about it, «why where you thinking about it, there is nothing that could probe is true, much less there wasnt even a hint to happen», well, maybe something called Triforce and a timeline split in two sounds not like the series at all, besides, those two time lines represent and are past and future, several people have been said it, isnt?

More impressive is the fact that, at launch, the PlayStation Vita has a title as packed with greatness as Uncharted: Golden Abyss, but I'd expect nothing less from something bearing the franchise namesake.

Something no less Important than Nothing / Nothing no less Important than Something, Tramway, Glasgow

It is nothing less than an astonishing height of arrogance that a layman who has apparently never published any climate - related research in peer - reviewed journals believes he knows something more than literally thousands of climate scientists engaged in climate modeling and research all over the world.

The «if we do nothing, the damage will be infinite and impossible to undo, so we must do something, and by extension, any price we pay now will be less than the price of doing nothing.»

Your analogy does not reflect doing something vs doing nothing, but doing less that perturbs the Chaos of the climate (going slower) vs poking the hornet's nest of climate Chaos — or extremities — with a bigger and bigger stick (going faster).

The narrative was always more important then the science, that's why it's a high pressure sales pitch to grab the authority «to do something» when there is less than nothing in actual empirical or reproducible predictive models to support the actions.

Or, paraphrasing something H. Dumpty J is reputed to have said: it's all about the power of persuasion — it's about how to convince people that when you use a word or picture, it means exactly what you say it means, nothing more or less (even if it doesn't).

Companies like Legal Zoom can be dealt with; indeed, nothing stops the profession from doing something similar, but the best answer to the Legal Zooms of the world is an effective advertising campaign by the Law Society, paid for by the profession (less than $ 100 per lawyer), to educate the public as to why lawyers are a bargain compared to disclaimer infested non-advice.

Nothing less than his best was satisfactory to him from his own personal point of view, and that's something that is a message that not everyone gets... It was a message I received.

There's nothing worse than buying something and finding the exact same item for less somewhere else.