In his argument, he posits a definition of «machine» that is
something of a straw man (or straw machine, I should say).
In that respect, the title of the page and the initial response create
something of a straw man.
I think the «deficit model» is
something of a straw man.
Not exact matches
What some experts are doing is putting up a
straw man, pointing to those extreme cases in which some people let the development
of the business plan become an end in itself —
something that gets in the way
of business rather than helping to optimize it.
«Annual caps on immigration are unnecessary and could exclude people with valuable skills, the Communities Secretary has said... John Denham has said the Government does not support the idea as applicants with
something to contribute should get the chance to come to Britain... «We don't think population is going to go to 70 million, so there is a bit
of a
straw man there,» he said.»
He's creating a
straw man here, saying that there's
something to be gained by consistency across every market in regard to criticisms
of pricing vs. cost
of production.
There is
something gloriously self - referential about playing the
straw man card in a post in which you, for no apparent reason, explicitly re-interpret «quite conceivable» to mean «kind
of likely», then call it «magical thinking», quote a psych text in case we don't know what magical thinking is and dismiss it out
of hand.
A
straw man argument is one that accuses someone
of saying
something they did not.
Now, if you can sort that out, where you're getting his quotes, maybe I've missed them, why you've totally ignored his scenario, why you're arguing against a
straw man of thermal equilibrium
of your own invention and brought in the totally irrelevant conduction through solids and all the arguments about the 2nd law with respect to that, maybe you could write
something worth reading about his paper.
A lot
of deniers seem to think climate models are looking for
something to fit to warming — these
straw men see the Keeling curve, say, «Hey, that looks like it!»
You can keep arguing against
straw men of your own construction, or you can actually try to learn
something about the subject.