Sentences with phrase «something of this magnitude in»

Not exact matches

It says something about the magnitude of the event that it played out during the tenure of two central bank Governors, each of whom were in the role for a decade, and will likely still be an important issue, in the early stages at least, for the next Governor.

If God is omniscient, omnipotent, benevolent, etc then the amount of knowledge required to be aware and know something like the magnitude of the possibilities I brought up would be immense, much more in line with the characteristics attributed to God.

Sager said he had run out of original things in his closet and went shopping specifically for something that fit the magnitude of an NBA Finals game.

Something of that magnitude reminds us how petty just about everything else is in comparison.

Now, after seeing the volume of participants and the importance that the IDNYC Program has been in the City of New York, I believe it is time for New York State Governor Andrew Cuomo to also do something of this magnitude for all residents of New York State.

A carer who took part in the study and whose father died from severe stroke, said: «If they had told us the magnitude of the stroke as far back as the first hospital visit we would have done things differently, rather than pushing for something that was never going to happen.»

This is one of the number one reasons it's hard to take «alternative» practitioners seriously, despite their good intentions: That is to say that we have such great control over our bodily pH. We don't (unless you were to, say, eat a box of baking soda or something), and the body regulates this very well, as a drop or gain of tenths of magnitude simply would result in coma and death.

The magnitude of what director Sanjay Patel has brought to the screen in the newest Pixar short SANJAY»S SUPER TEAM is certainly something that's not lost on him.

However, the hugely increased production costs and timeframe involved for massive AAA titles might push something of that magnitude into the far future, allowing a smaller niche release like Bully 2 to jump in sooner.

Performance of this magnitude deployed in a humble wagon feels wonderfully irresponsible in a way 507 hp housed in something low and penile never could.

Offering a magnitude of interior and exterior styling accessories, made with quality and detail in mind in the heart of Italy, they are bound to have something that catches your eyes.

Either way, something has gone wrong when a nation of such literary magnitude watches a reported 25 percent of its library jobs disappear in six years» time.

The speed and magnitude of the shift in pricing has demonstrated that when something matters to providers, they move quickly on it regardless of their size.

While it's not without precedent, the pace and magnitude of media personality participation in 2018 is something the Canadian online brokerage industry should be incredibly concerned about.

Today's CFPB report underscores the magnitude of the student debt crisis and the disastrous performance too many borrowers face from their loan servicers — something we've heard time and again in work with borrowers from across the country.

But I think it the scope and magnitude of the environments would lose something in transition to the smaller screen.

We sat down with artistic director Andriy «Prof» Prokhorov, govt producer Jon Bloch, and others to debate 4A Games» transfer from Kiev to Malta, chronicle the difficult process of evolving Metro from linear to open play areas, and study simply how giant these sandbox areas get (we're speaking orders of magnitude bigger than something in Last Light).

A gift of this size and magnitude hardly has precedent in the Spanish art world (though Anthony D'Offay did something similar with his gallery's collection, when he closed it).

Similarly, if the IPCC concludes that something is highly uncertain (such as the magnitude of changes in aerosol indirect effects), then there are no good grounds for assuming otherwise.

Pursuing this last point, it is clear that in the coming few decades we are going to be continually confronted with observations of trends or events of just this type — relatively short records; much larger magnitudes than our models suggest — raising the question of whether, on the one hand, models / theories are underestimating the rapidity of the response or missing something fundamental or, conversely, whether it is internal variability.

At best, maybe jetfuel would be on to something if the change in seasonal ice / snow cover in Canada is measurably altering the albedo, as scaddenp notes, but I doubt we'll see jetfuel come up with any evidence showing the existence or magnitude of such an effect.

An agreement at the level of some statistical significance in the fit is a good hint that there may be something real that causes that agreement, but as long as the physical calculations are off by an order of magnitude we certainly are missing a real explanation.

That's an order of magnitude which puts the effect in the «plausible, but needs verifying» range for me, and not something to be dismissed out of hand.

For example it costs only like something in the order of magnitude of $ 100 per acre foot to convey raw water from the Colorado River to Southern California because the Colorado River Aqueduct bonds were retired long ago.

If randomness (noise) is now considered as something simple, as it is intuitively, one has to seek a measure of complexity that increases initially as the number of variables increases, reaches a maximum where new properties may emerge, and eventually decreases in magnitude in the limit of the network having an infinite number of elements, where thermodynamics properly describes the network

Within economics modelling, attempts to model the feedback mechanisms that occur in the real economy are also really difficult — we know, for example, that investment in new technologies will act as an incentive for the existing technologies it hopes to substitute to become more efficient (the sailing ship effect — i.e. in the 50 years after the introduction of the steam ship, sailing ships made more efficiency improvements than they had in the previous 3 centuries) but how to quantify something even as simple as this is not easy BUT we have learnt a few ways to give sensible (order of magnitude) figures with time lags, the learning by doing effect and phased - in substitution effects based on massive amounts of data.

Something of this magnitude would have to be phased in over many years to be acceptable, but it would send a clear message to buyers / developers / etc of what is to come.

The missing variable fallacy of neglecting a factor entirely, implicitly treating it as 0 % effect, minimizing mention to quickly skip on (except when the target audience unavoidably already has heard of it), is common when something is so extraordinarily dangerous to the CAGW movement as to be he - who - must - not - be-named to them, a distinction which belongs to the magnitude of beneficial effects of CO2 (several tens of percent rise in plant growth rates under a more extreme scenario of CO2 doubling, plus as huge a rise in water usage efficiency, if the plants aren't underfertilized meanwhile) and to the dominating influence of cosmic rays on climate as in the link in my name.

Also if we are seeing a change in something it is required that at least one of the causes (drivers) is changing in frequency or magnitude.

jimmi said: «Also if we are seeing a change in something it is required that at least one of the causes (drivers) is changing in frequency or magnitude.»

It's not that there aren't perturbations from other sources, it is that those sources or sinks are orders of magnitude less important and are themselves nearly steady state phenomena, forming a nearly constant background correction, not something that contributes to active average temperature changes in climate.

(Mind you, this was something that I also thought was odd about the Wegman report: they showed these hockey stick PCs with tiny absolute magnitudes from «red noise» and compared them to an order - of - magnitude larger hockey stick PCs from Mann et al., as in Figure 4.1)

Now, not much DLR is absorbed at SSTint, because this is the Knudsen / evaporation layer and as I described earlier is orders of magnitude thinner than the skin layer in which all DLR is absorbed, (something like 200nm compared to 20microns for most of it and 0.1 mm for all of it).

It includes something I've been advocating for decades: «this graph also switches to 1880 - 1920 as a base period, because of the widespread interest in the magnitude of warming relative to pre-industrial time.»

However, there is evidence that a large quake of at least a 7.5 magnitude struck this area hundreds of years ago, so it is something for residents to keep in mind.