Sentences with phrase «something right the first»

Tell him not to get discouraged since the only way to improve is by making mistakes or by not getting something right the first time.

Making smart regulations means we do not have to keep amending the same law every session because we didn't get something right the first time.

Quality comes from taking your time to do / make something right the first time.

Relax, you must have done something right the first time so just focus on these job interview tips we have for you and you'll be fine.

Moral of the story is, if you don't do something right the first time you will end up spending a week repainting entire rooms of your home.

Not exact matches

It's great to invent something new and be the first mover, but you've got to keep looking over your shoulder for the fast followers running right behind you and make sure that you have a plan to keep ahead of the pack.

Landau: Honestly, Robert wasn't the first director we came to for this, but we never found the right fit to give up something that we believed in.

Your 20 - something self was right about the 401 (k) part: That's the first place most people should save for retirement.

«When I'm meeting people for the first time, I ask about something they're excited about right now, or what they do in their time off, rather than asking «What do you do?»»

If Clinton is to win, she has to go there — something she did during her first tour of swing states after essentially becoming her party's de facto nominee, and then right after accepting the nomination weeks later.

Dig Deeper: Marketing Your Mission Statement Small Business Website Design: Make Your Website Easy to Use If you're building something from scratch, the first step is to ensure you have the right minds working on the project.

JPMorgan's jump from third to first place means serious bragging rights for the global investment bank — it's something the bank can promote in marketing material when it pitches for work.

You don't use your bank account for stuff like this, that should be your first MAJOR clue that something isn't quite right.

I want to add something here: sometimes, when deconstruction hits you and you change your beliefs, you might realize that you were never really in love in the first place, or that your love has died, or that the pressure and expectations of your church forced you to marry and stay together even though it wasn't right.

Although the judge's decision did not deal with whether or not the sexual abuse actually happened, this latest turn of events is something of a victory for SGM, whose legal strategy has been to first argue that the First Amendment gives pastors the right to discourage victims of abuse from reporting the crimes against them to police and second to argue that the case should be thrown out on technicalities, such as the statute of limitatfirst argue that the First Amendment gives pastors the right to discourage victims of abuse from reporting the crimes against them to police and second to argue that the case should be thrown out on technicalities, such as the statute of limitatFirst Amendment gives pastors the right to discourage victims of abuse from reporting the crimes against them to police and second to argue that the case should be thrown out on technicalities, such as the statute of limitations.

The first couple of books start out as typical «solve - this - murder» sort of books (without being gory or cruel or gratuitous, it's more about the story and the characters)-- very satisfying Saturday night read — but as the books go forward, the layers and complex storytelling becomes even more clear and right around book three or four you begin to realise that everything is connected and everything means something and something major is unfolding and OMG MUST KEEP READING.

They say the only difference is that they asked for permission first... well, aside from the fact that I just explained why it's perfectly reasonable that she never thought she should have to ask, it that really the right thing to do, to force this poor woman to stand in front of her neighbors and beg for permission to do something so harmless and inconsequential?

On occasion, however, heeding first principles uncovers something of pressing public concern — something newsworthy, right under everyone's noses.

It should be something legislatures can not turn on or shut off at will, something that is anchored in the essential right of freedom of association protected by the First Amendment.

That was always my first indicator that something wasn't quite right with the pregnancy — my body quietly returned to normal and so I quietly began to grieve.

In order to understand a deacon or priest's relationship to his bishop, one must first know something about the rights and obligations of the bishop himself.

The first, in April 1967, was an attempt by the bishops to end Curran's career at CUA — something they had the right to do, since he did not yet have tenure and his promotion and the granting of tenure depended on approval by the Board of Trustees.

But consider the circumstances: this was the first major issue on which important evangelical leaders had broken with the Republican right — something that took real courage.

School prayer and abortion — the items highlighted in the survey — are comfortably within the realm of family values, but they are something else, too: questions closely allied to the First and Fourteenth Amendments, to civil rights as much as to family values, and, above all, to the nature of the relationship between the individual and the Creator who, as our Declaration states, endows each one of us with every right that matters.

It was quite a big accomplishment considering it was only a week ago that he tried smoking something on his grill for the first time — a whole chicken that I tasted right after it finished cooking and then used the leftovers in salads for lunch the entire week.

We recommend only substituting one ingredient at a time, so you can isolate variables, in case something doesn't turn out right the first time.

I've made it three times since I first tested the recipe and I can tell you right now: this combo is something that is going to live in my fridge for eternity.

I especially loved the very first sentence — something we should all keep in mind as we evaluate the team right now IMO.

In the midfield, (including RWB & LWB) we have a whole bunch of tweeners... none offer the full package, none make sense in our manager's current favourite formation, except for Sead on the left and Ox on the right, and all of them have never shown any consistency for more than a heartbeat... Sead, who I'm including in this category because of our present formation, looks like a positive addition, minus his occasional brain farts, but I would rather see what he could do in a back 4 before making my mind up... Ox, who has never played better, which isn't saying much considering his largely underwhelming play in previous seasons, seems to have found a home in this new formation; unfortunately, can we really expect this oft - injured player to handle the taxing duties that come with said position over the long haul, not to mention, it looks like he has no intention of staying... Ramsey has relied on the empathy that stems from his gruesome injury years ago and the excitement that was generated a few years back when he finally seemed to put in altogether, but on the whole he has been a big disappointment (neither he nor the Ox have scored enough to warrant a regular spot)... Wiltshire should be put on a weekly contract then played until he suffers his first injury, if and when that occurs he should be shipped - out and no one should very be allowed to say his name on club grounds ever again... Elnehy & Coq are average players who couldn't make any of the top 7 teams currently in the EPL... both have showed some great energy on the pitch, but neither are top quality and no good team can afford to have that many average players on their bench playing the same position, especially with Coq's injury history / discipline concerns and Elheny's headless chicken tendencies... as for Xhaka, his tenure here so far has been incredibly underwhelming... we know he has some skills to provide the long ball but his defensive work is piss poor and he gives the ball away too cheaply and far too often... finally, the enigma himself, Ozil, so much skill with his left foot but his presence has been more frustrating than uplifting... in many respects his failure has been directly related to the failure of this club to provide him with the necessary players up front, minus Sanchez of course, and unless something drastic happens very soon his legacy will be largely a negative one (much like Wenger's)

best formation is 4 -5-1, high pressure and fast counter attack, something like Klopp did with BvB seasons ago, Ozil vision, Walcott speed and Sanchez class can defeat anyone, passing is good but when opponent like Watford just sit and wait its hard to pass and score, start game with high pressure and fast counters than in second half start playing pass game, so with right balance it could be done, something we did against Liverpool last year on Emirates, first half high pressure and counter while in second half passing and controling game.

Not because he lacked the right skills, because the World Cup winner is vastly experienced and appears to be a natural leader, but because the Arsenal captaincy had become something of an issue with the former incumbent Mikel Arteta hardly being seen in the first team after being given it.

This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits

Right, because I would need to be Arsenes right hand man to know that a transfer like Benzema isn't something you simply «get done» in the first week of the transfer windRight, because I would need to be Arsenes right hand man to know that a transfer like Benzema isn't something you simply «get done» in the first week of the transfer windright hand man to know that a transfer like Benzema isn't something you simply «get done» in the first week of the transfer window...

Nothing like one underachiever blowing smoke up the ass of another... we know that Ozil has some incredible technical gifts, but to be considered the best you have to bring more than just assists to the table... for me, a top player has to possess a more well - rounded game, which doesn't mean they need to be a beast on both ends of the pitch, but they must have the ability to take their game to another level when it matters most... although he amassed some record - like stats early on, it set the bar too high, so when people expected him to duplicate those numbers each year the pressure seemed to get the best of our soft - spoken star... obviously that's not an excuse for what has happened in the meantime, but it's important to make note of a few things: (1) his best year was a transition year for many of the traditionally dominant teams in the EPL, so that clearly made the numbers appear better than they actually were and (2) Wenger's system, or lack thereof, didn't do him any favours; by playing him out of position and by not acquiring world - class striker and / or right - side forward that would best fit an Ozil - centered offensive scheme certainly hurt his chances to repeat his earlier peformances, (3) the loss of Cazorla, who took a lot of pressure off Ozil in the midfield and was highly efficient when it came to getting him the ball in space, negatively impacted his effectiveness and (4) he likewise missed a good chunk of games and frankly never looked himself when he eventually returned to the field... overall the Ozil experiment has had mixed reviews and rightfully so, but I do have some empathy for the man because he has always carried himself the same way, whether for Real or the German National team, yet he has only suffered any lengthy down periods with Arsenal... to me that goes directly to this club's inability to surround him with the necessary players to succeed, especially for someone who is a pass first type of player; as such, this simply highlights our club's ineffective and antiquated transfer policies... frankly I'm disappointed in both Ozil and our management team for not stepping up when it counted because they had a chance to do something special, but they didn't have it in them... there is no one that better exemplifies our recent history than Ozil, brief moments of greatness undercut by long periods of disappointing play, only made worse by his mopey posturing like a younger slightly less awkward Wenger... what a terribly waste

After the impact, the senior slumped over onto the turf — it was clear right away something was wrong, and even looked like he might've somehow hurt his head at first, but after looking at it, the ankle seems more likely.

«That's the first step towards fixing something, right?

We do not know if this little nugget of an Arsenal transfer rumour is actually right, but after Arsene Wenger signed a central midfielder Mohamed Elneny in the January transfer window and with the three current Arsenal players in question being generally on the fringe of the first team and being on the wrong side of the maghic 30 - year old mark I would say there is definitely something in it.

its about the last three seasons of mistakes, now if you want to be an ostrich you go right ahead but i have been supporting arsenal since the sixties (late 60s) and my first live game at highbury was in 1972 so i think i have the right to comment, something has got to change and you and AKB have to start to question some of his (AW) tactic's, i have until recently been on the fence but come on guys enough is enough

Still, though, the time feels right to have New Day drop the belts and move on to something else after trying to get them back, but it sure feels like WWE wants them to set the consecutive days record for the tag titles first.

Also what I noticed, right after hearing something from the in game commentator — Henry would repeat, but repeat in a way as if it being told for the very first time ever.

Devers mostly needs to concern himself with just filling in that crater a little bit so if something that was going right in the first half starts to go wrong, Boston isn't stuck with two gaping holes.

Delano, Indeed Giroud leaves alot to be desired, first half he just couldnt keep the ball, I mean they were just passes into his feet and he was terrible, where Lukaku was taking the same, and more difficult, passes and spinning away from our players, he is quite slow aswel but aerially he gives us something and when he does get it right hislink play is very good.

Even though his first touch was poor and he was generally rusty, he looked likely to make something happen just by taking up the right positions.

I'm pretty sure that my first comment ever on here was something about his abilities at left back, but I can't remember how I found it that time, so I can't pull it up right now.

Maksim you are 100 % percent right about Dan Petrescu's faith in youngsters.In just a few months he gave chances to Ivan Solovyov, Pavel Solomatin and Vladimir Sobolev to play in the first team.As for Mogilevets i think he will become and excellent player but not at Zenit.He needs to move elsewhere (and not on loan) to play first team football like Ionov did a few years ago.In my opoinion Zenit needs a striker (if they sell Hulk to AS Monaco) to score goals.Kerzhakov is not at his best, Bukharov has forgotten when was the last time he score and Dordevic is not gonna get a chance.I understand that midfielders of Zenit are all capable of scoring goals like Shirokov, Danny, Witsel, Bystrov and Fayzulin but thats striker's job and Zenit may lose a player on the filed.And something else, i was so impressed with Yuri Lodigin's performance against Krasnodar and maybe Zenit found a great replacement for Malafeev.

Dixon said, «He's (Alli) playing in the first team long - term because he's doing something right.

Our transfer policy needs looking into IMO because something is not right when you buy someone, knowing he has no chance at all of playing first team football for your club, then loan him out for six years, sell him to the club you got him from, buy him back to sell him but can't so sell him back to the original club again.

Three years ago, right around the publication of her first book, Carry On, Warrior, she confessed that she and her husband, Craig, were separating over something he disclosed when they were in therapy.

My first birth was totally non-scary right up until it went wrong; until then I thought birth was fairly quick, natural, something my body can handle.

Thank you it is helpful, it is our first baby and we just got worried a little that something might be not right.