Sentences with phrase «sometimes claimed in court»

For decades, forensic examiners have sometimes claimed in court that so - called pattern evidence — like ballistic markings, fingerprints, shoeprints, and more — could conclusively link evidence to a suspect.

Not exact matches

The proof of that future loss is sometimes a difficult task and usually involves medical assessment and / or actuarial assessment); d. past care cost (if you have spend money for your medical care that was made medically necessary owing to ICBC motor vehicle accident injury then you can expect to collect a sum of money equivalent to those reasonable treatment and medication costs please ensure that you keep the receipts and seek prior medical approval to eventually prove this loss); e. future care costs (if you will suffer repeated medical expenses in the future owing to your motor vehicle accident ICBC injury claim then you can collect a sum of money equivalent to that future loss); f. out of pocket expenses or «special damages» (if you suffer out of pocket expenses like for travel to / from medical appointments, cab fare, parking, etc, then this is also recoverable by you but again — keep track of these expenses in a log and keep a receipt book for later proof of this loss); g. legal costs (sum of the legal costs associated with advancing your injury claim are recoverable as the court system recognizes that often legal experts, lawyers and their agents are a necessary part of the process); h. other categories of damages: not discussed here are other categories of damages like «in trust claims» made largely for those who relatives who take care of you while you are recovering from your injuries or things like «loss of ability to enter an economically interdependent relationship» which might be awarded to a seriously disfigured potential spouse for his / her unlikely ability to become married in the future.

While in most accident cases there is at least one person (the injured party) who saw what happened, sometimes in personal injury claims the court finds itself in a situation where it requires to make a decision without any eye witnesses to the crucial facts.

The timeframe between issuing the Claim in Court to the time of the trial can take many months — sometimes years — depending on the complexity and value of the cClaim in Court to the time of the trial can take many months — sometimes years — depending on the complexity and value of the claimclaim.

In most personal injury and clinical negligence claims (not including claims for children or patients), usually the Claim Form must be received by the Court within 3 years of the date of the negligent event or three years from the date of knowledge of the event (sometimes this can be years after the event).

In contrast, small claims courts in California limit individual claims to $ 10,000 and overburdened judges decide sometimes as many as 50 claims a day, spending mere minutes on eacIn contrast, small claims courts in California limit individual claims to $ 10,000 and overburdened judges decide sometimes as many as 50 claims a day, spending mere minutes on eacin California limit individual claims to $ 10,000 and overburdened judges decide sometimes as many as 50 claims a day, spending mere minutes on each.

But it is also true that they are both parts in delivering a unified message: that of the common law courts» endorsement, sometimes ringing and sometimes more muted, of the value of access by the citizens to the adjudication of rights claims.

Acknowledging that earlier opinions of the Court «have sometimes overlooked th [e] distinction» between jurisdictional limitations and claim - processing rules or elements of a cause of action, Justice Ginsburg explained that «a provision governing the time to appeal in a civil action qualifies as jurisdictional only if Congress sets the time.»

Since The Children Act requires that the views of the child need to be made known to the court, fathers» rights campaigners claim that the mother sometimes alienates a child against his or her father and that this then supports the mother's case in court to banish the father.