Sentences with word «soothability»

Referred children showed less soothability than general population children.

There was however a difference between the children in levels of soothability (a subscale of negative affectivity).

The great individual variation in these capabilities can be described by dimensions such as the infant's disposition for distress or negative emotionality, irritability and soothability [57, 58].

Furthermore, the results of this study suggest that it could also be important to address soothability, the ability to calm down after distress, in diagnostic and treatment interventions of both internalizing and externalizing problems and disorders in referred children.

Regarding the fine - grained temperament traits, within the dimension negative affectivity, differences were found between the groups only in soothability: the referred children had more difficulty to recover from distress than the general population children.

Soothability refers to the rate of recovery after distress, both spontaneously and in response to the soothing techniques parents use.

After correction for internalizing behavior, more frustration, more impulsivity, more activity, less soothability and less inhibitory control were significantly associated with more externalizing problem behavior in the total group of clinically referred children (Table 4).

In population studies, there is consistent evidence that high levels of negative affectivity and more fine - grained traits within this dimension (such as frustration, sadness, fear and low levels of soothability) predict both externalizing and internalizing problems in infancy, preschool age, and school age [7, 22, 23, 24, 25].

Regression analyses indicated important contributions for high levels of infant Negative Affectivity, and low levels of Falling Reactivity and Soothability, to Internalizing type difficulties for U.S., but not Russian, youngsters.

Infants in the massage group were, however, statistically more likely to be soothable (soothability)(Analysis 2.2)(MD -2.90; 95 % CI -5.71 to -0.09).

Summary: (To include comparison groups, outcomes, measures, notable limitations) The current study evaluated the effectiveness of the Family Foundations (FF) program on coparenting; parental depression and anxiety; distress in the parent - infant relationship; and infant regulatory competence (sleep, attention duration, soothability).

Results found significant positive impact across all domains of outcomes examined: parent mental health and adjustment, coparenting and couple relations, parenting quality, family violence, and early indicators of child self - regulation (soothability, attention, sleep).

Neonatal CSF oxytocin levels are associated with parent report of infant soothability and sociability

The IBQ yields six summary scales: Activity Level, Smiling and Laughter, Distress to Novelty, Distress to Limitations, Soothability, and Duration of Orienting.

Subscales of negative affectivity and effortful control, namely more anger / frustration, less soothability, and less inhibitory control, were found to be related to clinical levels of comorbid internalizing and externalizing problem behavior.

The following fine - grained temperament traits were significantly correlated with internalizing problems: fear, anger / frustration, shyness, sadness, soothability, smiling / laughter, inhibitory control (Table 3).

Meanwhile, soothability was found to be related to both domains of problems and could therefore be a factor related to general psychopathology.

The following fine - grained temperament traits were significantly (at p <.01) correlated in the expected direction with externalizing problems: frustration, sadness, fear, soothability, high - intensity pleasure, approach, impulsivity, activity level, attention and inhibitory control (Table 3).

Negative affectivity included the fine - grained traits: anger / frustration, discomfort, sadness and (reversed) soothability.

Therefore, soothability might be an important temperament factor in relation to general psychopathology.

Notably, less soothability was the only trait that was related to more internalizing and externalizing problems when viewed seperately, and also to (sub) clinical levels of comorbid internalizing and externalizing problem behavior.

Regarding comorbid problems, less soothability (b = − 0.62, OR 0.54, 95 % CI for OR 0.36 — 0.81, p =.003), less inhibitory control (b = − 0.72, OR = 0.49, 95 % CI for OR 0.28 — 0.85, p =.012) and more frustration (b = 0.60, OR 1.82, 95 % CI for OR 1.09 — 3.05, p =.023) predicted the presence of (sub) clinical levels of internalizing as well as externalizing problem behavior in referred children.

The internal consistency (Cronbach's alphas) for the fine - grained traits was 0.72 for anger / frustration, 0.71 for discomfort, 0.60 for fear, 0.63 for sadness, 0.85 for soothability, 0.70 for activity level, 0.72 for approach, 0.74 for high intensity pleaure, 0.70 for impulsivity, 0.84 for shyness (reversed), 0.67 for smiling / laughter, 0.81 for attention focusing, 0.68 for inhibitory control, 0.69 for low intensity pleasure and 0.75 for perceptual sensitivity.

After correction for externalizing behavior, more shyness, less soothability, and less smiling / laughter were significantly associated with more internalizing problem behavior in referred children (Table 5).

In previous population studies, soothability has indeed been found to negatively predict problem behavior in children [24].

Less soothability, less inhibitory control and more frustration predicted (sub) clinical levels of comborbid internalizing and externalizing problems in referred children.

Those with ASD were lower than controls in Attention Focusing, Inhibitory Control, and Soothability.