Also, since the NAPBS mission relates to professionalism in the screening industry, and with most other professions having
some sort of accreditation or licensing process, it is very important for our industry to show that we are self - regulating before government agencies seek to over control the industry — accreditation is a big part of demonstrating that we police ourselves.
The ONLY people the public should assume have any canine behavior / training insight are those who have
some sort of accreditation in either behavior or training AND a lengthy list of satisfied clients.
Besides
a sort of accreditation, of course.
That will require
some sort of accreditation system that all nations recognize.
Not exact matches
I think too, this
sort of argument is exactly why homebirth midwives refuse to even engage in the conversation
of homebirth
accreditation because they are not willing to be told what they can and can not do.
The proposal to replace the Qualified Teacher Status (QTS) with what is supposed to be a «new stronger
accreditation», is nothing
of the
sort.
«Although family mediation is an unregulated profession (meaning that it is desirable but not mandatory to have objective qualifications, such as
accreditation, in order to call oneself a mediator and open a practice), most consumers would probably be reluctant to hire a mediator who has not been accredited (much as they would be unlikely to choose a self - styled «therapist» without some
sort of recognized training).