Andy implied in his comment that RC, a careful and rigorous group, is in
some sort of alarmist camp, and that his guy is the one sticking to the evidence.
Andy implied in his comment that RC, a careful and rigorous group, is in
some sort of alarmist camp, and that his guy is the one sticking to the evidence.
Not exact matches
For the time being, I'll close with what I find most disturbing and unbecoming about Tooley's post: His
alarmist abuse
of elitism or elite theory, which have recently become convenient, but unhelpful and terribly inconsistently applied, shorthand for all
sorts of political fears from people on the left and the right.
Providing
of course that one can
sort through some
of the opinionated crap that passes for facts in some
alarmist instances.
Heh, the stupid ones are the
alarmists who think they can sucker the marks with this
sort of idiocy.
Agee's proposal is the
sort of irrational nonsense that CAGW
alarmists are advocating.
But as usual, he tried to bluff his way around that by posting many comments showing where I'd responded to CAGW
Alarmists using the same
sort of language many
of them use much
of the time.
He is talking about insulation and I pointed out that the
alarmists are always using the insulation argument in a backwards
sort of way.
It's the
sort of rubbish CAGW
alarmist write all the time.
I have a reputation out there
of being some
sort of climate
alarmist, but I think there is a missing negative feedback.»
Alarmists, embarrassed by the earth's refusal to warm as their models predict, have concocted all
sorts of scary stories about «warming in the pipeline,» etc..
the model you've come up with is just as useless as the GCMs that the
Alarmists use, unless it can be made to have some
sort of skill with regards to predicting future climate.
I don't doubt that these cycles affect the earth's temperature, but the model you've come up with is just as useless as the GCMs that the
Alarmists use, unless it can be made to have some
sort of skill with regards to predicting future climate.
Global warming
alarmists and IPCC Climategate scientists predict all
sorts of evil doings because
of increased temperatures.
This is the
sort scaremongering that makes me doubt the credibility
of CAGW
Alarmists.
A very significant factor in how technology, civilization, and culture evolve this century, but by no means justifying the
sort of world - wide bureaucratic empire the
alarmists are trying to impose.
yes all
sorts of doom would occur if there was enough co2 in the atmosphere, but the
alarmists have exaggerated their claims