Sentences with phrase «sort of disagreement»

Furthermore, if there is any sort of disagreement within your marital settlement discussion, it would be wise to employ a divorce attorney or mediator to assist you in the process of formulating the marital settlement agreement for divorce or separation.
There has never been a gathering of Liberal Democrats in our history that hasn't seen some sort of disagreement.
In those verses we saw seven attitudes to make sure you have when involved in any sort of disagreement.
But in Jerusalem everything is more fraught and there's more sorts of disagreements and more vicious hatred about every one of these arguments than anywhere else.
These sorts of disagreements can even lead to conflict, especially if you're feeling undermined or unsupported.

Not exact matches

«If you have a disagreement of sorts, there's no chance to cool off — you feel pressured to resolve something that might need more time,» Smouse says.
Given the huge number of moral disagreements in the world, we should think twice about becoming the sort of people who let such disagreements get in the way of engaging in mutually beneficial trade.
Then there is the problem of sorting out disagreements among experts who, while sharing a general strategic outlook, may disagree about whether a particular weapons system is stabilizing.
Referring to the difference between atheism and religion as «a theological disagreement» is sort of like saying the difference between The Berenstain Bears and The Brothers Karamazov is a matter of «length,» but Jones is hoping that his atheist church will provide skeptics with a regular sense of community.
In polite company, and for the sake of keeping peace with each other (because mutual apostasies take so much effort), we can do with marriage what we do with our disagreements about eucharist and baptism: keep our mouths shut and let God sort it out in the end.
It is this sort of scholarly disagreement that causes some Christians to just throw up their hands and say, «Why bother?
If there really is a disagreement, and it's hard to determine who is wrong and who is right, and what sort of restitution is necessary — be the bigger person, be the peacemaker and give them what they want.
The combination of disagreement and agreement may well lead us not to consider splitting but to consider ways we might reorganize into co-denominations of sorts, separating in some ways but covenanting together in some ministries (e.g., relief aid, the publishing house, archives) and administrative programs (e.g., pension and health benefits for clergy).
Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox followers point out there are thousands of Protestant groups and all sorts of major disagreements in every brand of Protestantism, and the question is raised «how do you know what YOU believe is right?»
Those most threatened by calls for change are those who benefit from things staying as they are, so look out for people in positions of power who dismiss any sort of dissent or disagreement as troublemaking.
It's been understood that Vardy has had a disagreement of sorts with his boot sponsors Nike, who wanted to give him a different type of boot after his original ones were damaged in Leicester's recent league clash against Everton.
These sorts of shenanigans may seem far removed from abuse and nastiness on social media, but they have the same social and psychological underpinnings: the strict policing of tribal allegiance, the insistence that your opponent has the worst possible motives at all times, and the accusation of treason and betrayal for disagreement.
Many can not help but recall a similar instance in 1979 when victory was virtually, snatched from the jaws of the party's antecedent, Popular Front Party, (PFP), when following a disagreement of a different sort between the party hierarchy, one faction broke off to form the United National Convention (UNC).
Leaders of the party, elders of the party have been meeting and all this perceived disagreement will soon be sorted out.
Much of this disagreement is caused by the simple fact that, collectively, we have only recently agreed that the goal is feasible and we have not yet sorted out the issues that this creates.
Franck Dorlaud Yes I agree that keeping a dating profile active is cheating, we all agree with this sort of behaviour and there is no other name than a disrespectful, degrading behaviour or anything, however, my disagreement lies with is the mono - lateral mention of gender.
It contains: - a self - target setting slide with detailed objectives - videos about Earth day as a starter - an introduction to vocabulary through a matching up - texts about the environment, pollution and solutions - debating activities with arguments to sort out - vocabulary for debates (opinions and disagreement)- videos about solutions to protect the environment with a conversation to reorder and a sketch to do - a word search as plenary - a detailed review of objectives.
These disagreements are usually quite minor (like human siblings) but if you think your degus are having these sorts of squabbles too often, you can try adding additional food dishes and toys, or perhaps provide a bigger cage.
I also believe there are cases that can be justified when data requests should not be honored, but there's endless blogs about this sort of stuff, and a lot of people have their disagreements on ethics / politics, other people's motives, etc. and I'm not terribly interested in it.
I don't even care anymore if they are right I refuse to associate myself with the sort of thinking that would criminalize disagreement to Hades with the lot of them surely their downfall looms
So I would recommend — modestly — that skeptics try very hard not to buy into this and redirect all such discussions to questions such as why the models are in such terrible disagreement with each other, even when applied to identical toy problems that are far simpler than the actual Earth, and why we aren't using empirical evidence (as it accumulates) to reject failing models and concentrate on the ones that come closest to working, while also not using the models that are obviously not working in any sort of «average» claim for future warming.
At Planet3.0, we've had our internal disagreement about this, with mt arguing that McKibben's and Hansen's approach is correct, and that tar sand bitumen is a good place to draw the line, while Dan M has argued that this is a sort of arbitrary decision, and the tar sands should be treated just as another form of fossil fuels, rather than a bright line that should not be crossed.
I put it to Lord Bach that in his time at the MoJ there were a number of politically controversial cases, such as those over the treatment of Afghan detainees and the Gurkha immigration cases, that led to disagreements between ministers and the Legal Services Commission, which then administered legal aid: «We (he and Jack Straw, the then Lord Chancellor) resisted pretty well,» he says, the requests to interfere in such cases, «but it's not the sort of pressure a minister should be put under.
The «free speech» aspect of the debate over the Statement of Principles illustrated the difficulty in sorting out what is «impression management» and what is true principled disagreement and debate.
If any disagreement or misalignment exists between you and your recipient, get these things sorted out in your next round of communication.
Among the services it provides are finding the other parent if and when they have not given child support; sort out disagreements about parentage; work out how much child maintenance should be paid; and arrange for the «paying» parent to pay child maintenance - the parent who doesn't have main day - to - day care of the child; as well as pass payments on to the «receiving» parent - the parent who has main day - to - day care of the child.
I'm guessing that our free - ranging dinner conversation was typical of the sort you'd hear among such people in similar settings: Many salient and non-valid points were made on various topics of local and global interest, friendly disagreements erupted and, al
This worksheet describes each rule and provides tips and suggestions for you or your client to follow the next time there is a disagreement, argument, or other sort of conflict that is causing trouble in an important relationship.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z