Not exact matches
«College and Career Ready» indicators: Many states already include AP, IB, ACT, and SAT
achievement in their high school rating systems, and we heartily endorse all
of these
of these measures, especially those tied to
achievement on AP / IB
tests, which are precisely the
sort of high - quality assessments that critics
of dumbed - down standardized
tests have long called for.
A second kind
of instructionally insensitive
test is the
sort of standardized
achievement test that many states have developed for accountability during the past two decades.
NAEP
tests, unlike many state
tests, are not «norm - referenced» — designed in a manner that spreads student scores and
sorts students along a spectrum
of achievement levels.
(http://www.senatorphilpavlov.com/commentary-how-we-are-reinventing-states-outmoded-education-system/) What Sen. Pavlov fails to mention is that gaining a spot on the state's «
achievement gap list» is no measure
of any
sort of educational or learning issue — its simply an indication that a school's students have not met a predetermined goal, set by the state (not teachers), with respect to standardized
test scores in math or reading.
(School
achievement tests showed greater long - run effects in the Perry study, but these school - based
achievement tests are not the
sort of measure used in the Head Start experiment, probably because they are difficult to compile and compare across diverse schools.)
Not that it's an
achievement of some
sort, but Ford has done it, becoming the first automaker to do so since Google, another company that's already
testing autonomous vehicles in the snow, isn't technically an automaker... yet.