Because I only
sought civil contempt (designed to enforce compliance with the order) rather than criminal contempt -LSB-...]
Not exact matches
Since the
contempt initially
sought is
civil in nature, the contemptuous party is entitled to «purge» the
contempt — that is, given some opportunity to avoid these sanctions.
What is notable about the case is that the Workers» Compensation Board
sought a significant period of incarceration notwithstanding that jail sentences for
civil contempt are approached with the same reservation as jail sentences for health and safety offences.
«Criminal
contempt for conduct ex facie the court is generally initiated by the Attorney General while
civil contempt proceedings are initiated by a party or person affected by the order
sought to be enforced.»
What is notable about the case is that the Workers» Compensation Board
sought a significant period of incarceration notwithstanding that custodial sentences for
civil contempt are approached with the same reservation as custodial sentences for health and safety offences.