Sentences with phrase «sound science on climate change»
Clearly, governments will have to look elsewhere than the IPCC for sound science on climate change.
http://www.climate-resistance.org/ Not exact matches
Climate science still faces the dilemma articulated by the late Steve Schneider and misrepresented by his adversaries — how do we best ensure that the public arrives at an accurate understanding of climate change, when the «sound bite» limits on our speaking time to the media force us to choose between making a few points with all the appropriate caveats, vs presenting details of all the points we believe important but without acknowledging uncertaClimate science still faces the dilemma articulated by the late Steve Schneider and misrepresented by his adversaries — how do we best ensure that the public arrives at an accurate understanding of climate change, when the «sound bite» limits on our speaking time to the media force us to choose between making a few points with all the appropriate caveats, vs presenting details of all the points we believe important but without acknowledging uncertaclimate change, when the «sound bite» limits on our speaking time to the media force us to choose between making a few points with all the appropriate caveats, vs presenting details of all the points we believe important but without acknowledging uncertainties?
Recently several of my posts on the subject of climate change — including one last week titled» In Climate Science, Predictions Are Hard, Especially The As Long as It Sounds Foreign trope as used in popular cclimate change — including one last week titled» In Climate Science, Predictions Are Hard, Especially The As Long as It Sounds Foreign trope as used in popular cClimate Science, Predictions Are Hard, Especially The As Long as It Sounds Foreign trope as used in popular culture.
We can — and should — address the risk of climate change based on sound science without succumbing to the no - growth radicalism that treats climate questions as dogma rather than as situations to be managed responsibly.»
The Stephen H. Schneider Symposium, being held in late August in Boulder, Colo., will reflect on his approach to the climate problem and culminate with a session on this question: «The challenge of climate change mitigation and adaptation: How do we translate sound climate science into sound policies?»
The model Environmental Literacy Improvement Act seeks to ensure schools use sound science and provide for balanced discussion on issues pertaining to the environment and climate change.
For instance, Monbiot has it that «Between 2000 and 2002 [TASSC] received $ 30,000 from Exxon», and that this same organisation (The Advancement of Sound Science Coalition) «has done more damage to the campaign to halt [CLIMATE CHANGE] than any other body»... If donations of just $ 10,000 dollars can buy the effect Monbiot is claiming TASSC achieved with it over three years, why on earth would anyone pay for far more expensive comment drones?
As we have documented in numerous articles on the disinformation campaign on this website, although responsible scientific skepticism is necessary for science to advance, the climate change disinformation campaign has been involved not in the pursuit of responsible scientific skepticism but in tactics that are morally reprehensible including: (a) telling lies about mainstream climate scientific evidence or engaging in reckless disregard for the truth, (b) focusing on unknowns about climate science while ignoring settled climate change science, that is cherry - picking the evidence, (c) creating front groups and Astroturf groups that hide the real parties in interest behind claims, (d) making specious claims about «good science», (e) manufacturing science sounding claims about climate change by holding conferences in which claims are made and documents are released that have not been subjected to scientific peer - review, and (d) cyber bullying journalists and scientists.
So that brings me back to being a «consumer» of the case that you present — as a «bridge builder» between imperfect but sound science on both sides of the climate change issue.
Writing in the journal Science, an international team of scientists argue that the Reducing Emissions from Deforestation (RED) initiative, launched in 2005 by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, is scientifically and technologically sound, and that political and economic challenges facing the plan can be overcome.
The ABC, which regularly (or, I should say, continually) presents uncritical stories predicated on the certainty of looming catastrophic «climate change», yesterday presented news items revealing that, despite all the problems with lies and deceptions from the IPCC, the science on «climate change» is sound.
Next up, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) Chair Hoesung Lee gave comments on the role of the scientific community in creating agreements based on sound science.
The app lists common arguments put forward by those skeptical of climate change, and gives the counter-arguments based on sound science.
As the 1990s progressed and the rear - guard action against restrictions on smoking faded, The Advancement of Sound Science Coalition started receiving funds from Exxon (among other oil companies) and its «junk science» website began to carry material attacking climate change sScience Coalition started receiving funds from Exxon (among other oil companies) and its «junk science» website began to carry material attacking climate change sscience» website began to carry material attacking climate change sciencescience.