Third, as well as making CO2, the oxidation of methane produces water; this is a major
source of water vapor in the stratosphere, which is otherwise very dry.
What was
the source of water vapor large enough to build such ice sheets?
One reason for this big influence is that evaporation from the oceans is the primary
source of water vapor in the atmosphere.
In the stratosphere, methane oxidation...
source of water vapor.
Lack of ventilation is one of the most serious but other
sources of water vapor can come from combustion flues which leak into the attic, exhaust fans or sewer vents which terminate in the attic.
Not exact matches
Walter sees the benefits
of using methane as an energy
source as twofold: «Not only does it prevent a potent greenhouse gas from entering the atmosphere by converting it to weaker greenhouse gases —
water vapor and carbon dioxide — but using it on - site would also reduce the demand for other fossil - fuel
sources.»
The main
sources were
water - rich asteroids and comets bombarding the surfaces and
water vapor hissing out
of volcanoes.
In this case, the
source of the blurring is not
water vapor but the atmosphere as a whole.
The team chose the specific area examined in the study because it is Earth's warmest open ocean region and a primary
source of heat and
water vapor to the atmosphere.
A surprising discovery: The
water vapor emissions from the comet are significantly different from the stores on our planet, suggesting that asteroids, not comets, may have been the main
source of Earth's
water.
In 2005, while exploring the Saturn system, the Cassini spacecraft made a startling discovery: Cryovolcanoes on Enceladus were spewing jets
of water vapor and ice into space, possibly from a liquid
water source beneath the surface.
The distribution
of water sources on the surface was derived by observing variations in the
water signal during the dwarf planet's nine - hour rotation period, which suggested that almost all
of the
water vapor was coming from just two spots on the surface.
That is the main
source of more
water vapor and energy (as latent heat) in the air, and consequently weather trouble.
Not so much by direct photolysis
of water vapor (not generally a lot
of that in the stratosphere), but from CH4, which could build up in a nearly oxygen - free atmosphere, and being largerly
of biotic origin, with the H coming from photosynthesis (releasing O); O2 buildup itself was delayed because
of geologic O2 sinks (in particular, the conversion
of ferrous Fe (naturally present in the crust and mantle and which can dissolve in the oceans) to ferric Fe (precipitates out
of the
water, the
source of banded - iron formations, which humans have used to get Fe).
Moreover, the increase in atmospheric
water vapor content in the Arctic region during late autumn and winter driven locally by the reduction
of sea ice provides enhanced moisture
sources, supporting increased heavy snowfall in Europe during early winter, and the northeastern and mid-west United States during winter.
The distance the
water vapor traveled, the admixture
of vapor from different
sources.
Roughly 97 %
of the planet's
water is in its oceans, and the oceans are the
source of the vast majority
of water vapor that condenses in the atmosphere and falls as rain or snow on the continents.
If «ocean based
water vapor machines» are the
source of moisture for hurricanes, why has not a single «ocean based
water vapor machine» ever been photographed or documented in any way?
When a moisture reservoir is located on the exterior
of a wall assembly it can act as a
source of water that can migrate by a process called
vapor diffusion.
Pierrehumbert RT 1998: Lateral mixing as a
source of subtropical
water vapor.
Sun and Oort also comment on Raval and Ramanathan (1989), the
source of the bulk
of Clouds and
Water Vapor — Part One:
As to my
sources, maybe you should read some, I almost always quote from actual peer reviewed science (obviously foreign to you since you think sizes
of numbers is science), like this one that says that long lived greenhouse gases are the control knob and that
water vapor (with its lifetime
of a couple
of weeks) just reacts to changes.
Water vapor diffusion, while amenable to simple analysis, is often (but definitely not always) an insignificant
source of moisture in modern building envelopes.
Forced changes in irradiance are not only affected by changing concentrations
of constituents or other external
sources, but also by changes in
water vapor and clouds.
A detailed and very accurate calculation
of the atmospheric flows
of moist air must take into account also the effects related to the volume taken by
water vapor both when
water vapor is added by evaporation and when it's removed in condensation, but these effects are very minor corrections and not a
source of anything significant.
David, Wouldn't you agree that if the seasonal and geographic distributions
of atmospheric temperature,
water vapor, and clouds distributions
of climate model simulations are a reasonably close reproduction
of current climate conditions, that atmospheric dynamics is not a major obstacle or
source of bias in the modeling
of atmospheric effects.
Moreover, the increase in atmospheric
water vapor content in the Arctic region during late autumn and winter driven locally by the reduction
of sea ice provides enhanced moisture
sources, supporting increased heavy snowfall in Europe during early winter and the northeastern and midwestern United States during winter.
By harvesting
water vapor from the air and condensing it into liquid, atmospheric
water generators can essentially pull
water from the air, and these devices hold a lot
of promise for providing an independent
source of drinking
water.
These three
sources speak
of three entirely different things: a) the
water vapor feedback, b) the carbon cycle feedback, and c) effects on precipitation
of reduced longwave radiative cooling in the tropical lower troposphere.
Figure 1: Antarctic (Vostok) ice core records
of temperature, CO2 (upper) and CH4 (lower) including time - scale adjustment to account for ice - gas age difference associated with the time for air bubbles to be sealed (Petit et al. 1999) and corrected for variations
of climate in the
water vapor source regions (Vimeux et al. 2002) as described in Supporting Text
of Hansen and Sato (2004).
I suppose you'd have to get rid
of all the geothermal and volcanic
sources to reach zero
water vapor in the atmosphere, even with the rest
of the planet under entirely below - freezing conditions.
It is probable that even a 1 % variation in atmospheric
water vapor equals or exceeds all the effects
of human
sourced CO2.
Of course not, as
water vapor is no heat
source.
We propose a different
source of potential energy associated with
water vapor removal from the gas phase: after the Mayan forests were destroyed, evaporation and condensation ceased to occur over the Yucatan peninsula (irrespective
of how its albedo changed).
The simulator does not itself predict changes in
water vapor or clouds, and so those feedback variables are a separate
source of data with a higher uncertainty, but still likely to change in a manner that does not radically alter the results expected on the basis
of current understanding.