Sentences with phrase «source wording in a context»

Not exact matches

In other words, in context of the entire 9/11 tragedy, the diversity of victims and the totality of the museum, would an observer be left with the impression that Christianity was the sole religion affected or that Christianity was the sole source of faith employed in dealing with the aftermatIn other words, in context of the entire 9/11 tragedy, the diversity of victims and the totality of the museum, would an observer be left with the impression that Christianity was the sole religion affected or that Christianity was the sole source of faith employed in dealing with the aftermatin context of the entire 9/11 tragedy, the diversity of victims and the totality of the museum, would an observer be left with the impression that Christianity was the sole religion affected or that Christianity was the sole source of faith employed in dealing with the aftermatin dealing with the aftermath?

I am not making any claim to the nature of their salvation in the Hereafter, but it seems that your wanting to brand the word kafir seems more ideological than ontological.Continuing: Necessarily for those who do not speak Arabic in our daily lives, there can be no higher source of looking to the deepest meanings of words than their use by Allaah (swt) in the Qur» an and in the Qur» an the word has far from a neutral connotation.I am not sure what the use or even implied importance of Arabic is in one's daily life in this context.

As a verb, format is often used in the context of «formatting,» which usually refers to how you prepare and lay out your Microsoft Word source file prior to uploading it to Smashwords for conversion.

But you're going to have to take their word on that, since they don't seem to give a source and «announcement» in the context of Pokemon doesn't always exactly mean there'll be something big planned.

David Rose, politely, courteously, agreeably shared a cup of coffee with his neighbor, nodding and consenting about how something had to be done about CO2 levels, and then quoted his coffee companion out of context and reversing the sense of his source's words in a way we know he has twice (or more) practiced on our host, and more than once on others in the past too.

So, ignoring the every day English language meaning of the words, is there in fact a clear and precise definition of «assault» (in which case some sources are simply using it incorrectly), or do I just need to accept that there is confusion, even within the law itself, and rely on context to establish in any given instance which meaning is meant?