Sentences with phrase «sources make false claims»

I've seen so many «accurate» twitter sources make false claims during transfer windows, and then they back peddle when they don't happen and claim that the deal was almost done but «there were complications.»

Not exact matches

my husband is a professed Odinist I am... what I am I hate the terms and shit, a witch I say that proud and humbly with honor BC I am ashamed of the so called goth chicks that make false claims you are or your not as in odinism, now the All Father to me was God in their religion Baal is a nasty and dangerous evil nonhuman entity if Im wrong will you please show me your source, are you Wodenist or Odinist

I suspect that Liver's only source is the creationism website because they are the only ones who would make such a patently false claim.

Without casting Enlightenment rationalism as categorically evil, Wright details some of the problematic consequences of Enlightenment assumptions regarding the biblical text: false claims to absolute objectivity, the elevation of «reason» («not as an insistence that exegesis must make sense with an overall view of God and the wider world,» Wright notes, «but as a separate «source» in its own right»), reductive and skeptical readings of scripture that cast Christianity as out - of - date and irrelevant, a human - based eschatology that fosters a «we - know - better - now» attitude toward the text, a reframing of the problem of evil as a mere failure to be rational, the reduction of the act of God in Jesus Christ to a mere moral teacher, etc..

When comparing two sources: one a health blogger with a 30 year old medical degree, now retired, ranting on the Internet and making false claims ABOUT false claims, and the other, a researcher with a current university position, with an article published in a questionable journal, but with legitimate references... whom do you feel wins out on credibility?

He reminded those who want to make false religious claims out of the Federal Government's move on Sukuk to drop the idea fast noting that other non-Islamic countries of the world have utilized Sukuk as source of fund raising.

I faintly recall seeing such a claim made on the so - called CO2Science site, which has been identified as the source for some of Monckton's other false claims, so if you're quoting it correctly (and in future an exact quote with a link so others can see the context would be much appreciated) it seems likely that this one came from the same place.

A source close to Franco disputes that number, claiming that the accusations being made against the actor are «false.»

The vast majority of pet foods are safe and regulations are increasing to protect our pets from companies that would cut corners on source testing, manufacturing processes or make false claims.

Given that people on Brulle's side of the Global Warming / Climate Change argument have been making false claims for decades — for example, that New York and Washington would be under water by the year 20004 — and given that the mass media sound daily alarms about the climate threat, the statement in the National Research Council report that «some» information sources are «affected» by campaigns opposed to policies that would limit carbon dioxide emissions is scant foundation for believing a massive conspiracy exists.5

I work for a travel insurer who distributes product through several online sources and: * A traveler has the opportunity to read policy exclusions in the same way they would on a comparison site * All our products offer a free look period — it's the law not a comparison site selling advantage * We don't use false advertising to sell — unfair claim to make in such a broad way, especially when this article does just that.