Sentences with phrase «sources making the same claims»

The video backs industry sources making the same claims in the Korea Herald...

Not exact matches

One can not use a source to prove the claims the same source makes.

I am sorry, but when I see a picture of obama with Christian Ministers, or other Christian events, he has the same phony arrogant look on his face as he does when he's reading his teleprompter and blaming Bush, or making claims that Romney's «out of touch» or Romney «doesn't pay tax's», or Romney «personally out sourced jobs to China».

Special authority for the biblical view can not be claimed on the grounds of its potential utility in understanding life; other sources of potential utility can make the same claim.

I am seeing this same claim being made all over the internet (likely bloggers who have read this article as their source).

While the Uniform Language forbids an examiner from making «the unsupportable claim that the pattern of features in two prints come from the same source to the exclusion of all others,» Holt said in his letter to the Justice Department, «it does allow examiners to say they «would not expect to see that same arrangement of features repeated in an impression that came from a different source.

I faintly recall seeing such a claim made on the so - called CO2Science site, which has been identified as the source for some of Monckton's other false claims, so if you're quoting it correctly (and in future an exact quote with a link so others can see the context would be much appreciated) it seems likely that this one came from the same place.

I do not accept your arguments because they go on the contrary of what has been reported sometimes even on the headline of the article, and when asked for a source or proof you paraphrase the same point, post a passive - agrressive comment, or talk about your credentials as if somehow that alone invalidated the point being made against your claims.

The same source that claimed that the Ice Climbers will be making their return also stepped forward with news that «third parties will be heavily represented in the newest in the game as well.»

So you might expect those same environmentalists to be rather excited by a project that claims to be able to stabilise global temperatures at the push of a button, and keep them stable while the world makes the transition to energy sources of the future.

I work for a travel insurer who distributes product through several online sources and: * A traveler has the opportunity to read policy exclusions in the same way they would on a comparison site * All our products offer a free look period — it's the law not a comparison site selling advantage * We don't use false advertising to sell — unfair claim to make in such a broad way, especially when this article does just that.

Its smaller counterpart called the Google Home Mini will supposedly make an appearance at the same event, with sources previously claiming that the repeatedly leaked speaker is codenamed «joplin» as a direct reference to Janis Joplin.

What makes these claims even more far - fetched is that the sources give the Pad 3 a 2011 release date, which, despite recent speculation, is inconceivable in the same year the iPad 2 launched.