Sentences with phrase «space than any other man»

At a distance of more than 11 billion miles from Earth, there is little question that Voyager has traveled farther in space than any other man - made object.

Not exact matches

The way of distinction, therefore, puts a positive valuation on the time - space continuum and, though it sees divine redemption as the remaking of history into something new, it can not conceive of divine - human interaction in other than historical terms which preserve the qualitative difference between God and man.
Homicide statistics are much more reliable, and consistently across space and time, show that more women are killed by their intimate partner than men — although in total, far more men are homicide victims (that's mostly men killing other men).
The Copernican revolution has thus led us by steps to the point where God (presuming for the moment that we can still use this word in a meaningful way) must be much greater than the pre-Copernicans ever imagined, while on the other hand man, in spite of the recent rapid expanse of his knowledge and technology, appears to have been reduced to an infinitesimal role in space.
I am not worried about them they will drop points for sure but the way they played man city and didn't give them space but then i knew city were weak we need to work out a system when opponents play in our face other than that Liverpool will hammer them
Ok, maybe you expect that last one, but when Chelsea play 3 men always around him, his better option is to create space via other means than dribbling.
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
Trying to thread passes to tightly marked men moving into the space occupied by other defending players is always going to be a thankless task and reflects more poorly on the passer than the runner to the untrained eye.
Came from a pure man blocking scheme, not athletic, not very good in space, hadn't played anything other than RG in college.
Interesting read on that cartilagefreecaptain post, but I think both men have done a lot more than the stats can reflect — their runs (much like Defoe's) have a habit of creating space for others.
But the full extent of the math that Katherine Johnson and the other women and men of NASA used to send astronauts safely into space and back is much richer and deeper than any one approach.
None other than Nikolei Drevin, wealthiest developer in the world, and the man who single - handedly is funding the first luxury hotel in outer space, Ark Angel.
Some of its set pieces feel more tongue in cheek than the other games (see the ghost ship in No - man's Wharf), but if that means we get to fall hundreds of feed through a tear in time and space onto a throne room suspended in a chaos realm before taking on an ancient king and his cronies with a litany of soldier friends at our back — it's straight up Paradise Lost fan - fiction — then I don't mind some cheese on occasion.
Unable to wrap their heads around the idea of Pac - Man sharing space with Mario, Sonic the Hedgehog, and Mega Man for any other reason than «just because,» some have said that Pac - Man doesn't fit in with this crowd.
With five current exhibitions on view (two permanents and three temporary), is a museological space of reference in Lisbon, where the visitor can enjoy the best of modern and contemporary art, hosting the Berardo Collection with its more than 70 artistic tendencies and more than 900 works that demonstrates its strong museological and didactic nature, with works by artists like Marcel Duchamp, Pablo Picasso, Salvador Dalí, Joan Miró, Man Ray, Andy Warhol, Francis Bacon, Jackson Pollock, Gerhard Richter, James Rosenquist, Alexander Calder, Jean Dubuffet, Yves Klein, Maria Helena Vieira da Silva, Helena Almeida, Louise Bourgeois, Dan Flavin, Andreas Gursky, Nan Goldin, Rebecca Horn, Donald Judd, Anish Kapoor, Jeff Koons, Nam June Paik, Frank Stella, Bill Viola, among many others.
Other than that I like the idea of shared office space as it could make a one man company feel more like a real business, which is extremely important to clients.
Some heterosexual women report kissing other women as part of the college social scene or for men's attention, while others do so to experiment or explore potential same - sex desires.1 A 2012 study found that both women and men perceive women who kiss other women in heterosexual spaces (for example, bars that heterosexual individuals frequent) as more promiscuous than those who kiss a man, and that women and men perceive such women as more likely to be heterosexual than bisexual or lesbian.2 In some ways, this last finding may suggest that women and men do not always perceive female - female kissing as necessarily an expression of women's same - sex desire.
To prevent sexualized interactions from developing with a partner other than a spouse, the Open Door Rule says that contact between individual men and women who are not married to each other should take place only in public spaces.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z