Sentences with phrase «space up front»

Hyundai's interior designers have done a great job carving out very usable space up front, in the back, and in the rear cargo area.
Bloggers are getting complimentary passes and reserved space up front in each seminar room.
Honda claims rear knee room has been boosted 40 mm and there is more foot - well space up front.
Space up front is excellent and there are plenty of storage spaces for hiding away the clutter of family life.
Space up front is identical to the coupe, but those in the back will be a little more cramped.
Though overall space up front is good (there's lots of head and leg room in the front seats, and the storage cubbies are of a decent size), the same can't be said of the back row.
Otherwise, cabin space up front is actually quite decent and materials, while never approaching the touchy - feely quality of something like a Golf GTI, do at least seem to be hard - wearing.
We found a lot of space up front but full size adults will find legroom scarce in the back.
I would like to see larger cupholders and more «cubby hole» space up front.
There is plenty of space up front, but the rear is a different matter.
And for its small stature the Versa punches well above its weight — even daring to encroach on territory occupied by larger cars like the Accord and Camry, delivering ample space up front and in the rear.
It features comfortable and supportive front sport seats, a racy flat - bottomed steering wheel, lots of leather and Alcantara, sufficient space up front, and a backseat that can comfortably carry a couple of adults.
But space up front is generous for two adults.
That said, it's not by a huge margin: whilst space up front is fine, with plenty of adjustment in the seat and steering wheel, the back seats are hemmed in a bit for overall headroom.
Plus it boasts more rear knee and shoulder - room and more space up front.
Noise levels are low in the cabin, and there's plenty of space up front for two adults to spread out.
There's no shortage of space up front, but the rear seating area is a bit cramped — passengers over six feet (1.83 m) lack sufficient headroom and legroom.
Adults will have enough space up front in the comfortable and supportive seats, but in back, things are still tight and best suited for short trips and children.
The added space is most noticeable from the back seat, but the Cadenza also boasts the most head room, space up front and the largest interior volume among competitors.
While the Focus is tight in the back, there's plenty of space up front.
There's more space up front thanks to the Ram's transmission dial — just rotate it for Park, Neutral, Drive, etc..
The spacious Fabia offers impressive space up front, with a height adjustable driver's seat and both height and reach - adjust steering wheel combining with lots of seat fore - and - aft adjustment to allow a good driving position to be found.
There's plenty of space up front, but the passengers in the back won't have too much to complain about - although the large transmission tunnel means the middle seat can feel cramped.
There also is an amazing amount of storage space up front, including a lockable cubby between the two seats that is large enough to fit my bulky laptop bag.
Come on it is not FIFA where you can put just any player with space up front and it works.

Not exact matches

Specifically, Foster said, he had to get $ 50,000 up front, then pay $ 25,000 a month to rent the space from AMC, which would still be the leaseholder — and he had to get a $ 2 million line of credit.
This is a slightly toned - down version of the winner's posture: Keep your shoulders down and back; aim your chin, chest and forehead straight in front of you or slightly up; keep space between your arms and torso — not too much — and, again: Keep those hands out of your pockets.
You need to make a large up front purchase not only for the goods, but the extra cargo space needed for the volume you purchase.
For Bell, there was something about standing up in front of a group of people and reading «an ancient text and then unleashing it in the space» that changed him.
The grown - up dining room, taking up most of the ground floor of a gorgeous 1937 Art Deco building, is that rare restaurant that defies demographics: Drop - in — friendly high - tops up front, comfortably spaced tables (the ones where your parents can finally hear something) in the back.
They split responsibility evenly, but ended up playing to their strengths: Firth out front, where, according to Rembold, «he had the ability to make every single person in a crazy chaotic space feel like they were the most important person there,» and Tarlow leaning more on the considerable logistics of something like renting refrigerated trucks to pick up produce in Pennsylvania, or setting up a butcher shack out back.
We could have had Cesc delivering those beautiful long balls from deep, same as he used to do for Henry and now does for Costa, to Welbeck who does much better up front as last man with space to run, not scuffing around in the box or Sanchez.
With Giroud up front creating space for the wingers but they know they have to cover only Alexis.
When your Center Forward moves in a way that is too linear or static, it is almost impossible to open up spaces with combination play (I'm not talking just knock downs and flicks here and there), because your front three aren't as fluid in their movement.
I wish Flamini would drive into the space in front of him it would really open up our attack.
This means Eden Hazard and Alvaro Morata are up front, and there's an extra space in midfield for Cesc Fabregas.
wow are we sterile up top, goals need to come from defense again, ozil & cech were great, mert once again taking the brunt of bad comments meanwhile a clean sheet and did nothing wrong, open goal that was saved was kos out of position and monreal caught up the pitch too high, giroud has great ball skills, issue is his position on the pitch, watched the match again focused on giroud, he tends to camp behind the defender from the ball, this only works when you have the quickness to break, he does nt, I have screen shots where ozil is 25 yrds farther up the pitch then giroud, thisis the problem, he is rendered useless unless ozil holds up, and thats not ozils strength, thus very few sog's from giroud on the run, when giroud gets lucky w space in front of the defender, he is lethal, but needs to get into that space,
This is an incredibly difficult question to answer for a variety of reasons, most importantly because over the years our once vaunted «beautiful» style of play has become a shadow of it's former self, only to be replaced by a less than stellar «plug and play» mentality where players play out of position and adjustments / substitutions are rarely forthcoming before the 75th minute... if you look at our current players, very few would make sense in the traditional Wengerian system... at present, we don't have the personnel to move the ball quickly from deep - lying position, efficient one touch midfielders that can make the necessary through balls or the disciplined and pacey forwards to stretch defences into wide positions, without the aid of the backs coming up into the final 3rd, so that we can attack the defensive lanes in the same clinical fashion we did years ago... on this current squad, we have only 1 central defender on staf, Mustafi, who seems to have any prowess in the offensive zone or who can even pass two zones through so that we can advance play quickly out of our own end (I have seen some inklings that suggest Holding might have some offensive qualities but too early to tell)... unfortunately Mustafi has a tendency to get himself in trouble when he gets overly aggressive on the ball... from our backs out wide, we've seen pace from the likes of Bellerin and Gibbs and the spirited albeit offensively stunted play of Monreal, but none of these players possess the skill - set required in the offensive zone for the new Wenger scheme which requires deft touches, timely runs to the baseline and consistent crossing, especially when Giroud was playing and his ratio of scored goals per clear chances was relatively low (better last year though)... obviously I like Bellerin's future prospects, as you can't teach pace, but I do worry that he regressed last season, which was obvious to Wenger because there was no way he would have used Ox as the right side wing - back so often knowing that Barcelona could come calling in the off - season, if he thought otherwise... as for our midfielders, not a single one, minus the more confident Xhaka I watched played for the Swiss national team a couple years ago, who truly makes sense under the traditional Wenger model... Ramsey holds onto the ball too long, gives the ball away cheaply far too often and abandons his defensive responsibilities on a regular basis (doesn't score enough recently to justify): that being said, I've always thought he does possess a little something special, unfortunately he thinks so too... Xhaka is a little too slow to ever boss the midfield and he tends to telegraph his one true strength, his long ball play: although I must admit he did get a bit better during some points in the latter part of last season... it always made me wonder why whenever he played with Coq Wenger always seemed to play Francis in a more advanced role on the pitch... as for Coq, he is way too reckless at the wrong times and has exhibited little offensive prowess yet finds himself in and around the box far too often... let's face it Wenger was ready to throw him in the trash heap when injuries forced him to use Francis and then he had the nerve to act like this was all part of a bigger Wenger constructed plan... he like Ramsey, Xhaka and Elneny don't offer the skills necessary to satisfy the quick transitory nature of our old offensive scheme or the stout defensive mindset needed to protect the defensive zone so that our offensive players can remain aggressive in the final third... on the front end, we have Ozil, a player of immense skill but stunted by his physical demeanor that tends to offend, the fact that he's been played out of position far too many times since arriving and that the players in front of him, minus Sanchez, make little to no sense considering what he has to offer (especially Giroud); just think about the quick counter-attack offence in Real or the space and protection he receives in the German National team's midfield, where teams couldn't afford to focus too heavily on one individual... this player was a passing «specialist» long before he arrived in North London, so only an arrogant or ignorant individual would try to reinvent the wheel and / or not surround such a talent with the necessary components... in regards to Ox, Walcott and Welbeck, although they all possess serious talents I see them in large part as headless chickens who are on the injury table too much, lack the necessary first - touch and / or lack the finishing flair to warrant their inclusion in a regular starting eleven; I would say that, of the 3, Ox showed the most upside once we went to a back 3, but even he became a bit too consumed by his pending contract talks before the season ended and that concerned me a bit... if I had to choose one of those 3 players to stay on it would be Ox due to his potential as a plausible alternative to Bellerin in that wing - back position should we continue to use that formation... in Sanchez, we get one of the most committed skill players we've seen on this squad for some years but that could all change soon, if it hasn't already of course... strangely enough, even he doesn't make sense given the constructs of the original Wenger offensive model because he holds onto the ball too long and he will give the ball up a little too often in the offensive zone... a fact that is largely forgotten due to his infectious energy and the fact that the numbers he has achieved seem to justify the means... finally, and in many ways most crucially, Giroud, there is nothing about this team or the offensive system that Wenger has traditionally employed that would even suggest such a player would make sense as a starter... too slow, too inefficient and way too easily dispossessed... once again, I think he has some special skills and, at times, has showed some world - class qualities but he's lack of mobility is an albatross around the necks of our offence... so when you ask who would be our best starting 11, I don't have a clue because of the 5 or 6 players that truly deserve a place in this side, 1 just arrived, 3 aren't under contract beyond 2018 and the other was just sold to Juve... man, this is theraputic because following this team is like an addiction to heroin without the benefits
I still don't understand people's obsession with boxing players in to a specific role... The whole «true DM» is a dying breed, even Coquelin is arguably something else considering the advanced positions he takes up often in front of Santi and takes major risks in winning the ball back for us... IMO, the reason Coquelin has had such a successful integration into the first team is that he focussed incredibly hard on the basics of his role first and foremost before adding other elements to his game (long - balls, driving runs into space, more aggressive ball movement in general) it's not rocket science to tell a player to curb the attacking side of their game and focus primarily on defence before attack... Nor is it that hard to see that playing in a midfield pairing with either Ramsey or Cazorla is going to be different as well.
This allowed Koscielny and Mustafi to shut down the space in front of them breaking up attacks earlier and putting pressure on Chelsea that they couldn't find an answer to.
If we do get someone who tackles early in the build up because if you tackle late in this league you are shown a card, someone who can stick their head on any type of cross, and someone who can take the space in front of them and charge with the ball, while also having the pace to change directions if there is a counter.
Xhaka has the flu and has left behind in London, so I expect Wilshere and Elneny to take turns at helping out the defenders, leaving Ramsey more space to go forward to help Ozil and Lacazette up front.
The 12/13 season he was our one and only option up front and played a crazy amount of games that season, often 2 - 3 full matches in the space of a week.
Schneiderlin + Cech + poacher up front = a ball - winning cultured passer of the ball; a league and Champions League winning goalkeeper with big game credentials and someone to grab a cheeky goal in tight spaces when we're struggling with all other methods of creativity.
But did you notice on Saturday that we actually moved the ball around a lot quicker and we stopped looking for him on the left so he can keep cutting inside and estimg up laca space I believe laca suffered a bit with him in the team as the sevice was lacking to him and it always went to Sanchez and now he is suffering from a lack of confidence He will come good and now we have an awesome front line again.
But unlike the Broncos, Arizona has even fewer players up front to feel good about and less salary - cap space to address those problems.
With Romelu Lukaku ranging around up front, offering just as much as Ibrahimović with his back to goal but vastly more on the turn, or running into space, United's main striker is now a threat from every part of the pitch (except, apparently, the penalty spot).
A DM is utilised to keep the ball in front of the defence so they always have time to shape up but this is completely nullified by a long ball game where the ball is played into space behind or to the side of the defence.
His job is to match up and nullify the opponents AMs who operate in the pockets of space in front of our back 4, the likes of Silva, Fabregas, Coutinho etc..
He'll find spaces easily and with the pace of Welbeck and Alexis up front, there will be lots of movement and therefore loads of opportunities for him to break Spurs hearts.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z