I know it's not
my spam filters because I get all their other crap emails about upgrading my device, my service, and how cool it is that they're an «un-carrier» (whatever that means).
RSS is a protection against
spam filters because there is no need for that technology.
In fact, they had been sent two death threats, but the first was caught by the University's
spam filter because it used an expletive.
With thousands of pitches, the media has to sort through each week, you don't want yours getting lost in
a spam filter because of an attachment.
Not exact matches
I know this
because whatever machine learning they use to stop online harassment is more like an email
filter to weed out some political fluff from your inbox or kill
spam.
My
spam filter recognizes it as
spam because, well, it kind of IS!
The problem is that
because of comment -
spam, and despite a good
spam filter, enough crap slips through every day that I've kept...
The problem is that
because of comment -
spam, and despite a good
spam filter, enough crap slips through every day that I've kept the system set to require site administrator approval for all comments.
We can build all the
filters and blacklists we want, but the spammers have an incentive to find ways around those defenses
because sending
spam continues to be a relatively easy way to make money.
In most cases, if you don't find the email in your regular inbox, it will be in your
spam filter or junk mail folder
because your email settings are not allowing email from Mostly Mutts
«some submissions are deleted
because they trigger the
spam filter, but there is no hint at the offending words or phrases.
Also, some submissions are deleted
because they trigger the
spam filter, but there is no hint at the offending words or phrases.
Because after reading this horror story,
Spam filter costs lawyers their day in court (Washington Post, 7/13/07), I've realized that not even my beloved e-filing systems are impervious to error.
In other words, if your email consists of a single large image, and no text, your
Spam Assassin score will be higher (
because your text - to - image ratio is virtually zero), and your risk of being
filtered much greater.
However, two of the lawyers who called didn't get our message
because their
Spam filter caught our e-blast.
The document never got through
because of my
spam filter.
I have to read all of the
spam (hundreds a day)
because sometimes legitimate comments get caught in the
filters.
Because of the massive amounts of
spam gnawing away at our collective bandwidth, the very stuff your MTA should be configured to
filter out.
I use very little
filtering because I need to be accessible by email and can't have clients go into a
spam filter.