Sentences with phrase «spatialization of»

This exhibition features a new spatialization of Sala's The Present Moment (in B - flat)(2014) and The Present Moment (in D)(2014), in which he rearranges Arnold Schoenberg's «Verklärte Nacht» [Transfigured Night](1899) to create the sense that individual notes, abstracted from the composition, travel freely throughout the gallery before accumulating and playing in repetition as if trapped in a spatial impasse.

Improved spatialization of loot chest audio by increasing the audio volume if you're aiming at them.

The spatialization of time (with fantasies of time travel is a familiar way this mistake is found in the philosophy of science as well as popular culture.

The more troubling problem is whether causal determinism entails the spatialization of time.

Bergson saw, I think rightly, that the spatialization of time loses time, except as an appearance to consciousness.

It appears that the fallacy of spatialization of time is committed by young children and — quite a number of philosophers!

As Capek shows, determinism, and with it reductionism generally, has followed from the spatialization of time, a spatialization still too readily applied in our sciences.

This means that it is far more accurate to characterize Minkowski's fusion of space with time as a temporalization or dynamization of space than as a spatialization of time.

Interestingly enough, Whitehead arrives at the notion of the fallacy of misplaced concreteness through his reading of Bergson's critique of simple location and the spatialization of things (SMW 50), a critique also familiar to Derrida (MP 37; 227).

Whitehead «deconstructs» the modern fallacy of simple location and the spatialization of reality, thus critiquing the representational assumptions of philosophy.

The spatialization of the things a mind is thinking about and the actual concrete process by which a mind does what it does have to be kept distinct, and yet the process of conscious thinking does give rise to the product, i.e., thought.

The upshot of Bergson's critique of the spatialization of time is, then, very similar to James's critique of the associationists.

He agrees with Bergson that any kind of spatialization of time eliminates effectively time itself, i.e., genuine succession.

In Whitehead's view «the extensiveness of space is really the spatialization of extension; and the extensiveness of time is really the temporalization of extension (PR 289 / 442).

Brightman is very cautious about using analogies in speaking about God, particularly if they involve spatializations of the relations.

Not exact matches

Let me mention at least three instances of distorting spatialization.

The third instance of vicious spatialization is merely another form of the previous one: the belief that every temporal process consists of a dense succession of durationless instants in the same sense as a geometrical line consists of dense continuum of dimensionless points.

Bergson's great merit, still not sufficiently appreciated and understood, was to show how seriously «the fallacy of spatialization» prevents us from grasping the authentic nature of time.

Whitehead's mature statement on the matter of whether spatialization is a sort of falsification seems to equate all merely partial accounts of reality (e.g., spatializations) with distortions.

And this point is also relevant to the charge made by Hartshorne and others that, unlike Whitehead, Bergson's attachment in continuity leads him unwittingly to deny any definite units of reality.31 And second, Whitehead does hold that spatialization, such as conceptualization and quantification require, falsifies experience.

In fact, Bergson and Whitehead have very similar orientations and attitudes towards the activity of spatialization.

Therefore, in light of this and Gunter's arguments, I see no irreconcilable, or even significant difference between Whitehead and Bergson on the point raised by Northrop regarding spatialization and distortion.

If Whitehead had been cognizant of this he would have realized that Bergson does not condemn the intellect wholesale, nor the activity of spatialization.

Second is the affirmation of Bergson's charge that spatialization is a partialization of experience.

This brings us to the second problem with Northrop's claim that Whitehead and Bergson differ on the matter of whether spatialization constitutes a distortion of our experience.

Bergson and Whitehead are both fallibilists, who choose descriptive metaphysics over prescriptive or transcendental metaphysics, and if there is a disagreement between them on the question of how spatialization distorts our experience, it is a difference of degree, not of kind.

Northrop observed such a confluence, and held that Whitehead and Berg - son differed only on one major point of doctrine: he alleges that, for Bergson, spatialization in science constitutes a falsification of experience, while he thinks this is not the case for Whitehead.30 There are two problems with this claim by Northrop.

Spatialization allows for the distinguishing of concepts and percepts presupposed by the intellect.

This is to say that even though it comes about through the distortion of spatialization that conceptualization forces on reality, this conceptualization and the very tension it generates are integral to reality as a whole.

Bergson is cited several times in a sympathetic but nonessential fashion, in connection with such concepts as «intuition, «canalization,» and «spatialization,» all of which refer to the characteristics of thought and experience, rather than to evolution or to Bergson's wider evolutionary cosmology.

Children gradually realize that their confusions of time with spatial trajectory contradicts their own experience — sensory and, especially, introspective — and they give up spatialization; philosophers, while they are fully aware of the same contradiction, retain spatialization and deny experience — and are even proud of it!

The question why the fallacy of spatialization does not entirely disappear with childhood would require another paper.

The records of these three meetings strongly suggest — I do not say, demonstrate — this about the general outlook of the young mathematician Whitehead: he had a positive attitude toward change, tension, the multifariousness of things and qualities; his hackles rose over the notion of unrelieved uniformity; and he rejected Democritus's «spatialization» of change.

Most of his pieces from the 40s on are named Spatial Concept, adapted from his theory of «spatialization.»