Sentences with phrase «speak about it yet»

I wanted to share those thoughts here along with my heart shaped cookies, but I don't feel that I have anything resolved enough to speak about yet.

They just haven't been able to speak about it yet.

Not exact matches

The investigation was prompted by about a dozen complaints concerning the Trump school that the attorney general, Eric T. Schneiderman, has found to be «credible» and «serious,» these people said, speaking on the condition of anonymity because the investigation was not yet public.

I thought about how much Americans value democracy and having their voices heard, yet I was perplexed that so few people were speaking out.

Speaking to CNBC at the Singapore Airshow, John Slattery said there is no offer yet, but the company had made submissions to the securities exchange in Brazil about the discussions that are taking place between the two companies and the Brazilian government.

New York and Philadelphia city officials say they have yet to speak with Musk or The Boring Company about the massive project.

Yet another global regulator is speaking out about its attempts to fight fraud in the ICO market.

Mark Zuckerberg has yet to speak publicly about last week's news that a researcher turned 270,000 responses to a Facebook quiz into profiles of 50 million Facebook users, which he turned over to Trump - affiliated political research group Cambridge Analytica.

When we spoke, I asked Scaramucci about the yet - to - be-instated fiduciary rule.

Even though President Donald Trump has yet to speak out — or tweet — about his cheating scandal with porn star Stormy Daniels, he's definitely keeping up with all of the news surrounding it by...

I have not retired yet — I'm still teaching economics, writing an investment newsletter and speaking at conferences — but like many of you, I'm concerned about making sure my wife and I have enough to live on if and when we decide to retire.

No one from the president's team has resigned as of yet, but some spoke candidly on Wednesday about whether they could continue to work much longer for a man who has expressed such sentiments.

For instance, Hamid speculates about a future political order, based on pure democratic assemblies: «How this assembly would coexist with other preexisting bodies of government was as yet undecided... [U] nlike those other entities for which some humans were not human enough to exercise suffrage, this new assembly would speak from the will of all the people, and in the face of that will, it was hoped, greater justice might be less easily denied.»

But the next time you see a gay or lesbian person and think to yourself, «They are sinful, they are lost, they are wrong, or they are an abomination...» understand that you may very well be speaking about your own partner, your own child, your own parent or brother or sister... and you don't even know it yet!

You know nothing about Pope Francis or the Jesuits, yet you speak and blast every religion.

@fimeilleur actually i can back up the claims i make both personally and historically, one example Abraham, Machpelah (actual location of his tomb and remains along with 5 others in Israel right where they are supposed to be) Kedorlaomer king of Elam, (defeated by Abraham and recently discovered) it is said Abraham believed God and it was credited to him as righteousness.More than that Abraham saw God and spoke with Him, not the god you are on about that men use to justify their evil intent, but the God who has created all things, the God that no one especially you can not contain.Ignorance is your choice but that will not negate the existence of God in any way.No one that i am aware of has all the answers at this point regarding spiritual things, evolution or evilution there are areas God has not yet revealed to mankind but every day more is discovered.I find it amazing that God is big enough to share discovery even with those who would reject Him.

I see so CNN feels the need for yet another attack on Christianity... Why doesn't CNN speak about other religions?

And yet we must not be afraid of the «dualist» tag, rightly understood, when speaking about human nature.

Yet that is what Jesus told the disciples about this supposedly eternal temple of God, and barely 40 years after he spoke these words it lay in ruin.

So you've justified living a lie to your family, yet speak about the irrationality of people with faith.

More than a few Catholic theologians speak about a «final fundamental option» on the boundary of death, rather than a purgatorial option, as the latter has to do only with those who die as «just souls» yet to be fully cleansed (see Edmund Fortman, Everlasting Life After Death).

This time has been a critical moment of transition and momentum for me: as I look to publish a book this year that God spoke to me about eight years ago, as the church we serve in begins to feel momentum and grace for a new season, as my wife and I close out our seventh year of marriage, and enter what I believe will be our most fruitful season yet.

A quick about Abba Pambo — a contemporary of Origen: «If we asked [him] for a word from scripture or some other thing, he would not give us an answer right away but would say, «I haven't figured out the meaning of this word yet»... It normally happened that he spent two or three whole days, or a whole week without giving us an answer saying «if I do not know what sort of fruit this will bear, whether it is a fruit of death or life, I will not speak.»»

Yet for some reason, we so easily speak about God's power as if God was being revealed in the building of crosses and not in their bearing.

But even when he is speaking in the tones of Jeremiah, he will suddenly break in with the melody of Isaiah, offering hope that in repentance we can still go forward toward God in genuine hope; and he will do so in passages (here from «Transgressions and Infirmities») that powerfully recall the cadences of St. Paul: «On the whole, then, this may be considered a Christian's state: ever about to fall, yet by God's mercy never falling; ever dying, yet always alive; full of infirmities, yet free from transgressions; and, as time goes on, more and more free from infirmities also, as tending to that perfect righteousness which is the fulfilling of the Law.»

However, because church people know and proclaim him who is Lord of all, the church will — if it is true to its Lord and to itself — speak with concern and passion about those things which have been learned regarding this creation, and about those things which are yet to be learned.

Thus, while strictly speaking, the conjunction of a contingent statement — that oppression is real — with a metaphysically necessary statement — that God is G - of - A — yields what is technically another contingent statement — that God is G - of - O; there is a certain undeniable ineluctability about the truth that if oppression is real, then God can not fail to be G - of - O, which compels me to indicate its ineluctable character by saying that it is «restrictive yet necessary» (and here necessary does not mean metaphysical necessity).

Yet each of us hears them speaking in his own tongue about the marvels God has accomplished.

Once more Paul was relating the trouble he had with speaking to his being perceived as a fool; yet on the other hand he «saw» more things than others, he had revelations and visions in abundance, and for him that was the ultimate sanity, a thing to boast about.

They worship tradition, dress up in gaudy expensive clothes and march around, making arbitrary rules and regulations about every little thing, thinking if they do these things and make magical gestures that this somehow «cleanses» the outside of the cup, yet Jesus already knew of their type of priest in the old days, speaking against Pharisees for doing the exact same things the Catholics have been doing for centuries.

Yet the whole context of the passage indicates that Paul is not speaking primarily about the resurrection after death but to new life in the present through knowing Christ as Savior.)

Only four times does the Koran speak of Muhammad, and yet 97 times it talks about Isa.

It is as if there is almost three tiers of religion M. Scott Peck speaks about this in some of his writings, the bottom tier are those who blindly accept, the middle level is composed of those who came to reject the things they accepted blindly, and the final tier of enlightenment is those who have gone through all the hard questions, accepting nothing blindly, yet eventually find God.

And yet, in Africa and elsewhere fresh materials are «being introduced into scripture, prayers, hymns and liturgy» which could have an effect on «how people in the West think and speak about the gospel and the church.»

If I walk around talking about how a giant invisible rabbit named Harvey speaks to me, I would rightfully be diagnosed as schizophrenic, yet if I say that an omnipotent invisible being speaks to me it is perfectly acceptable.

But on the other hand, when in talking about sin one talks only of such sins, it is so easily forgotten that in a way it may be all right, humanly speaking, with respect to all such things up to a certain point, and yet the whole life may be sin, the well - known kind of sin: glittering vices, willfulness, which either spiritlessly or impudently continues to be or wills to be unaware in what an infinitely deeper sense a human self is morally under obligation to God with respect to every most secret wish and thought, with respect to quickness in comprehending and readiness to follow every hint of God as to what His will is for this self.

@Karen — You speak as if there were records of atheists to go by, yet there is a decided lack of information about the old days.

Yet, the challenges of hearing God's voice in these areas does not mean God can't or won't speak to us about them.

But the despairer, as he was depicted in the foregoing, did not observe what was happening behind him, so to speak; he thinks he is in despair over something earthly and constantly talks about what he is in despair over, and yet he is in despair about the eternal; for the fact that he ascribes such great value to the earthly, or, to carry the thought further, that he ascribes to something earthly such great value, or that he first transforms something earthly into everything earthly, and then ascribes to the earthly such great value, is precisely to despair about the eternal.

If I spoke on abortion, I was applauded as courageous, as a ferocious man of God, and yet when I would tackle race I was being too political... If I quoted the great reformer Martin Luther... never did I get an email about his blatant anti-Semitism.

This dream proved to me that God wants to speak to us about events that we may never be involved in physically, yet he still wants us to play a part in.

You can be in agreement with Professor Dawkins that Adam did not exist, yet know and feel that the story of Eden speaks profoundly about ourselves.»

Yet we can only speak in succession of what appears in contemporaneousness; in discourse we must abstract relations, such as love, from the terms related and the terms from each other, so that we are always in danger of speaking of God without reference to the being he loves and that loves him; of speaking about religion or love of God as distinct from ethics or the love of neighbor.

Bishop Thomas Paprocki of Springfield, Illinois, spoke with CNN during a break in the Friday session to explain why the clergymen are meeting about this titillating, yet rare, rite in the Catholic tradition.

you'd think if god was truly the god spoken of then faith would be unneeded and belief a thing of the past — yet — people will believe whatever they wish no matter the proof or lack there of and its truly sad to consider that this delusion type mass brainwashing is going on right now and has been for over 2000 years... please don't let the time in which this sm.ut has been around make you think its worth its wieght in salt — i bid Lot's wife its not — in ALL early man stories from around the globe people have created GRAND stories about the start and end of times — its that simple.

My problem is mot so much about tithing (haven't totally made up my mind about that yet) or even automated giving (although I'm not really comfortable with that), my problem is with the way that guy speaks to his church.

Yet even many of these Christians, who wanted so badly to have a back - and - forth relationship with God, were a little hesitant to talk about hearing God speak with their ears.

We speak obsessively about «the environment», yet we hardly reflect on what this word really means for human beings.

The people speak, both through their prayers and through the visible tale told through their eyes, and the wind gives voice to the forces of the world about them and impinging upon them; yet God has nothing to say.

Yet they often speak of ongoing anxiety about their decision, even though they are utterly convinced it's the right one for them.