Sentences with phrase «speak in a way such»

Combined with Jayne & Ray's (2015) findings, it is safe to say that therapists can show they are being empathetic to their client by matching the client's body language and mirroring their verbal style, as well as allowing the client to speak in a way such that they feel they are really being listened to.

Not exact matches

Even if that's enough to tip the balance for Thiel personally, though, it's hardly sufficient to explain why he chose this election to speak out in such a high - profile way.

For example, when Prison Break's Wentworth Miller came out on Facebook talking about his struggle with depression, it created a fabulous opportunity for one of my students Jason Finucan, who speaks about destigmatizing mental illness in the workplace, to help take a celebrity story and parse it in such a way that a lay audience can understand and apply it in their daily lives.

There are many different ways to look at communication in the small - business world — from the individual formats such as writing and speaking, to different contexts such as client communication and employee management.

Before going solo, Acuff worked his way up in an advertising career, eventually writing for brands such as The Home Depot, Staples and later landed his dream job, writing and speaking for the Dave Ramsey team.

People use it for standard blockchain - related procedures, such as lifting a smart contract, but it also has the capability, technologically speaking, of being used as currency, in the way of fiat money.

GFI aims for diversity in their hires primarily through hiring practices that are intended to help them minimize the effects of bias, such as encouraging staff to score applications anonymously, using generalized ability tests, and meeting applicants only late in the process.88 While they've hired many women, including in seven of nine director roles, they find that their team is lacking in diversity in other ways, and they've met with Encompass to discuss further steps they can take to develop their diversity strategy.89 One staff member we spoke to mentioned that they hoped GFI would be able to begin paying interns, which might help diversify their team by broadening the pool of potential interns who could afford to take a position with GFI.90, 91

The lector's job is to speak the text in such a way that it may catch us and thereby speak to us.

It speaks publicly in secular, pluralistic democracies in such a way that its words can be heard and the truths they express can be engaged by everyone.

Even so, looking at the transfiguration in conjunction with other Christophanies reminds us that such texts speak uniquely of Jesus Christ in ways that evoke from the church awe, fear and worship.

«As they participate in various causes, it is essential that they engage in and speak in such a way that faithfully represent the college's evangelical Statement of Faith.

The Gospels have in their way met this problem, not only by placing the kerygma on Jesus» lips, but also by presenting individual units from the tradition in such a way that the whole gospel becomes visible: At the call of Levi, we hear (Mark 2.17): «I came not to call the righteous, but sinners»; at the healing of the deaf - mute, we hear (Mark 7.37): «He has done all things well; he even makes the deaf hear and the dumb speak.»

If God desires to speak to human beings, he must do so in such a way that he can be understood.

Helmut Thielicke has taken this criticism seriously in his Theological Ethics, speaking of the various structures of our common life, such as the state, law, economics, etc., as «orders of history» rather than as «orders of creation,» and presenting them in an infralapsarian way as «orders of the divine patience, given because of our «hardness of heart» (Matthew 19:8).»

What I appreciate most about the foundation is its ability to speak to such people in a way that his helpful and gracious without being condescending.

First, though most Christians do not speak hatefully toward others or about others, the sad reality is that the media and the internet gives such examples of hate speech from Christians way more publicity than it deserves, which in turn gives the impression that this is the way all Christians are, which is not true.

(2) This is not to say that it has been my intention only to comfort you, but rather that if and when I may have spoken in such a way as to appear to be without doubt and frustration and anguish, it has to do again with the stance that the occasion of lecturing / writing thrusts upon me.

Rather than speaking of our time as a post-Christian age, the contemporary Christian might more truly say that the Word appears in our history in such a way as to negate its previous expressions.

As long as we conduct ourselves in such a way, we have the convenience of speaking our own religious and cultural language.

Biblically speaking this should never happen, but even pastors have treated me in such a way.

Dr. King comments on the thoughts of Lorenzo Dow McCabe who attempted to challenge the metaphysical foundations of traditional Christian theology: If theological reconstruction is to meet the needs of philosophy, scriptural exegesis, and religious experience, thought McCabe, then theology must reassess its traditional theistic assumptions in such a way that it can speak of a God who is capable of relating fully to the contingencies of personal life and historical change.

Many contemporary Baptists would be surprised to learn that venerable shapers of the Baptist tradition such as Andrew Fuller, Richard Furman, B. H. Carroll, and even E. Y. Mullins often spoke in an affirming way of «the Baptist creed.»

Can we speak of God and of his Love in such a way that it does justice to our increasing knowledge and power?

Credence must be given to the writer in one area though in that Christendom has failed in some ways to properly «speak» or represent Christ from their pulpits and daily walk; some spew out false doctrine and self - serving «religiosity» that one can not be surprised that the Enemy (Satan) is now using those same words and actions to accuse them through writers such as we see here.

If, in Genesis, individual legends and originally separate cycles of legends are combined in such a way as to convey the theological drama of Israel, if the spoken lines are the lines of the play, we observe at the same time that this literary material of legend always refuses to yield itself completely to such editorial, theological design..

I think God speaks clearly in these times because of his silence it means he has had enough of our ways we havent listened we have gone our own way we havent acted on what his prophets have spoken so he distances himself until such time that we will take him seriously.Thats how it was in the old testament he allowed his people to go into captivity or bondage when they refused to obey his word.We see this pattern repeated over and over for example In Egypt when they were in slavery it wasnt until the people acknowledged there sin and cried out to God to save them and he did by sending a savior moses.Because we have Christ we have grace he wont spurn us like he used to because Christ took away our reproach and he is free to love us despite our sinfulness.brentin these times because of his silence it means he has had enough of our ways we havent listened we have gone our own way we havent acted on what his prophets have spoken so he distances himself until such time that we will take him seriously.Thats how it was in the old testament he allowed his people to go into captivity or bondage when they refused to obey his word.We see this pattern repeated over and over for example In Egypt when they were in slavery it wasnt until the people acknowledged there sin and cried out to God to save them and he did by sending a savior moses.Because we have Christ we have grace he wont spurn us like he used to because Christ took away our reproach and he is free to love us despite our sinfulness.brentin the old testament he allowed his people to go into captivity or bondage when they refused to obey his word.We see this pattern repeated over and over for example In Egypt when they were in slavery it wasnt until the people acknowledged there sin and cried out to God to save them and he did by sending a savior moses.Because we have Christ we have grace he wont spurn us like he used to because Christ took away our reproach and he is free to love us despite our sinfulness.brentIn Egypt when they were in slavery it wasnt until the people acknowledged there sin and cried out to God to save them and he did by sending a savior moses.Because we have Christ we have grace he wont spurn us like he used to because Christ took away our reproach and he is free to love us despite our sinfulness.brentin slavery it wasnt until the people acknowledged there sin and cried out to God to save them and he did by sending a savior moses.Because we have Christ we have grace he wont spurn us like he used to because Christ took away our reproach and he is free to love us despite our sinfulness.brentnz

Also appealing is Epstein's assertion of judgment in such matters as dress («The baseball cap marks a steep decline in elegant male attire» and «The notion of having shined shoes speaks to holding up standards, even if in a very minor way»).

Calling a woman who has an abortion for any reason a murderer is hate speech and those who speak in such a way need to be hauled before the courts.

Theologians who have quite properly protested against the notion that God was such that he needed to be made friendly and available to his creatures by reason of some event (in this case the death of Christ) which opened up for him this possibility, have failed to see that in this inadequate and often misleading way of speaking, there was an insight of which they should have taken due account.

He speaks to the people only in the language of history and in such a way that they can explain what happened as the coincidence of adverse circumstances.

For he is attempting not to speak about God but rather to speak in such a way as to make God manifest as the origin, center and end of speech.

But we should now ask if there is a way in which we can speak intelligibly of «resurrection» without having such questions to plague us.

It is refreshing in an age when Richard Rorty and his followers have told us that we can not speak this way to hear a philosopher doing so, but, at the same time, it is hard to know what to make of such talk in the light of Taylor's other claims.

It was a literary convention of the period to introduce an historical work in some such way, but it is of course possible to conform to a literary convention and yet to speak the truth.

But on the other hand, when in talking about sin one talks only of such sins, it is so easily forgotten that in a way it may be all right, humanly speaking, with respect to all such things up to a certain point, and yet the whole life may be sin, the well - known kind of sin: glittering vices, willfulness, which either spiritlessly or impudently continues to be or wills to be unaware in what an infinitely deeper sense a human self is morally under obligation to God with respect to every most secret wish and thought, with respect to quickness in comprehending and readiness to follow every hint of God as to what His will is for this self.

The Old as well as the New Testament has the astonishing power to speak of the divine in such a way that the I - thou character of the relation never darkens the transpersonal power and mystery of the divine, and vice versa.29

Later on, Pharisaic ideas were more highly «spiritualized,» and Paul, himself a learned Jew before his conversion to Christian faith, probably reflects such notions in the way in which he speaks of resurrection in I Corinthians 15.

Why then should we insist on speaking of the human mission of «completing, through our work the work finished on the sixth day, as if God had created nature in such a way as to leave to humanity the margin, the risk, and the honor of this artifice?

They have spoken of how the Word became flesh, but in such a way that God in no sense becomes other than what he has been from eternity — a «becoming» which does not «become.

Pietro speaks in a simple and open way about his wife and their life as a couple and family; the way Gianna's passion for life and for God brought such joy to the many aspects of family living.

In talking about God with images we do not say that God is such and such, we say that God is like such and such (the same way that Jesus spoke about the Kingdom of God in his parablesIn talking about God with images we do not say that God is such and such, we say that God is like such and such (the same way that Jesus spoke about the Kingdom of God in his parablesin his parables).

The witness is the person who speaks this word in such a way that God, in sovereign judgment, declares it «True, worthy of attention, really faithful» (Barth).

The interpreter has to look for that meaning which a biblical writer intended and expressed in his particular circumstances, and in his historical and cultural context, by means of such literary genres as were in use at his time, To understand correctly what a biblical writer intended to assert, due attention is needed both to the customary and characteristic ways of feeling, speaking and storytelling which were current in his time, and to the social conventions of the period.

Now seriously... who needs to speak in tongues or have dreams and visions when you see Jesus loving others through your life in such tangible ways?

We must re-appropriate the doctrine of original sin in such a way that it speaks to our condition, and lends heuristic power to our personal and corporate forms of addressing evil.

As for this article and anyone who speaks Christian, Jesus said of those who speak and act in such a way to be seen of men (and impress them) «they have their reward.»

I'll ignore the systematic consequences of such a view, and I'll just point out that the Bible DOES speak of Jesus in a way that doesn't just outline the consequences but PROMISES the result.

And you should get over that expectation that people won't speak in such a way.

Under the gospel, we do not have the right to say what we want, when we want, and where we want, but are called to speak in such a way that all people will be drawn to Jesus because of His great love for them as revealed in our words and actions.

In speaking in the way of recognition and response, we are intending to cover ground that might be considered under such a rubric as «ethics»In speaking in the way of recognition and response, we are intending to cover ground that might be considered under such a rubric as «ethics»in the way of recognition and response, we are intending to cover ground that might be considered under such a rubric as «ethics».