Sentences with phrase «speak to anyone there»

When you speak to anyone there you can tell they care and have more knowledge than the other local driving schools.

Castro said constituents complain of long lines at the district office and having to make appointments to speak to anyone there.

Not exact matches

Last year there was a string of serial rapes and we are speaking with some of the local advocacy groups and developing a plan to keep the space open and staffed Friday and Saturday nights until an hour after the bars close so that if there is anyone feeling uncomfortable or threatened by a situation can come and use the space as a safe haven and have the option of being walked home at the end of the evening.

We spoke with more than half a dozen current and former Twitter employees, and the general consensus is that there isn't anyone in the building ready to step up in a Noto - like role.

«in a language other than Spanish»???? Has it ever occured to anyone that there are hundreds of other languages out there and just because someone speaks one (or more) of them does not make them a threat to you.

There is no more evidence that any «LORD» spoke to them and «anointed» anyone as king than that he spoke to the Duke of Windsor to abdicate so that eventually Queen Elizabeth would be «anointed» as the British monarch.

I am glad that the Report has found that there is no evidence that Waddington abused anyone else after I spoke to him in 1999.

A big magic fairy man spoke a spell and then there was earth and light before stars and then a snake talked to a woman and then the big magic fairy man had to sacrifice himself to himself to appease himself by exploiting a loophole in a plan he made himself because of an invisible disease (sin) in an invisble body part (soul) so that he doesn't have to torture us forever in the big fire pit he made even though he doesn't want anyone to ever go there but he just can't help himself.

There was not mention of «forcing» anyone to speak to the chaplain.

So many people who advocate or speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to religion when someone is wanting to speak out about there faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do with the mentioning of God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to speak about there faith I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.

If you were a real Christian you would know Christs words speak for themselves and the fact that he didn't take the sword away and turn it into a pruning shear right then and there does not mean he was saying «I mean all this stuff is for later after I come back and kill all the evil people and those who haven't accepted me as their savior so you won't have to fear anyone so you can finally give up your guns and weapons of war...» You disgust me chad.

There is a sense in which being available to speak for everyone taints one's ability to speak for anyone, particularly the transcendent God of the universe.

Anyone who has spoken up in a board room knows it can be intimidating to put your ideas out there and expose them to criticism, especially when you're really excited about them.

Every religious person walks around with their holy scripture, claiming that their scripture speaks of the truth, but there is no way to validate anyone's claims.

There is also a practical benefit to Reno's ecumenism, in that anyone speaking of «Christian society» in this day and age invites being tarred with words like «theocracy» and «inquisition,» as if Christian society necessitated those forms.

Even the most highly organized churches which insist on the importance of «legitimate» orders recognize with the Church of England that» «there always remains the power of God to give to the Church prophets, evangelists and teachers apart from the succession,» and even the most spiritualistic groups will elect certain men to interpret the sense of meetings in which anyone moved by the spirit is allowed to speak.

He's not imposing his views or beliefs on anyone by speaking at a church... other than people who wanted to be there.

For example, I believe that anyone who speaks presupposes that there are hearers who have a reality similar to that of the speaker.

Lots of expectation and very little affirmation... ------ I surely can't speak for anyone but me, but yes, tough job [but then Jesus made it clear it wasn't going to be easy, so no surprise there].

Is there anyone (except the likely insane) to whom God has spoken in the last 2000 years?

There we go again, shut up this hypocritical rightwingers.Only at election time do rear their ugly heads up to be seen and heard.It's time to unleash the CRACKKIN, the monster that the IRS people use on unruly religious groups, exemption is like a death sentence to these groups.Most of these religious leaders are wolves in sheeps clothing, selling their political poison to anyone in their flocks.They push the envelope on the seperation of church and state issue, seeing how far they can go.Pastors and ministers would never speak politics like this years ago, that was taaboo.Now people like Robertson, Graham, and the rest, flaunt their ideaology both religious and political at every event.They don't care about the legal consequences, they have LAWYERS, perishioners pay for that.

As an outsider not privy to psychic, celestial conversations there is no way for anyone to know if it was God who spoke with those people, Moses, Joseph Smith, David Koresh etc ad nauseum or if it was mental illness.

For example, when I lived in Dallas, there were several famous churches in town, and though I often heard people speak about the church, I can not remember anyone ever referring to the church by its name.

So that's it for arsenal fans... try a lot and give it all... there's hundreds of options in the first and second divisions who fit the bill on that score!!!!... If giroud has been massive for france then it's no wonder they don't look like title winners... though having said that anyone looks massive next to gignac... figuratively speaking....

The only problem there is that we don't have anyone who can take Coquelin's place if anything happens to him (the stats speak for themselves).

Speaking of Auby, does anyone else feel that there is a small chance for some club to almost go in for him under the radar (with the right price) and snatch him quietly / quickly while everyone else is eyeing up all the future French wonders along with Spanish and Italian based players making big splashes.

I apologize if i'm speaking for you in the wrong context Jonestown, but I think he was trying to point out that these «squad» players that people seem to want so badly may not be as stoked at the competition within our team as we would be... Sure there's arguments for a quality upgrade with a few players, but a few may have to leave before anyone comes in.

If that happened we would still need to find a replacement and anyone with the ability would not come cheap, so this report that claims there could be a transfer swap on the cards with PSG for their German international Julian Draxler would fix that problem and kill two birds with one stone, so to speak.

Speaking at a press conference, he also reiterated that there was a shortage of quality strikers and that his decision not to buy anyone was the right one.

Speaking on the United Review, he said: «It's very important for us, it's important for the team, it's important for the manager, and when it's like that, there is also competition amongst ourselves, so we always have to improve because I don't think anyone is automatically entitled to their position in that team.

And speaking as someone who's just moved into the next phase (separated five months but only just filed yesterday), even if there's no fighting going on, even if it's the most amicable and collaborative divorce anyone you know has ever seen... if you didn't want to get one and would give anything if the other person had just been able to take those first steps to getting on the right path again and walk it together, then there's nothing about it that's going to feel «easy» no matter how you slice it.

There is no phone number on the website to speak with anyone.

ALBANY — There has never been anyone better prepared to be governor than Andrew Cuomo, and if you speak to people close to the 52 - year - old attorney general, the word «destiny» is often heard.

Speak to anyone who has worked with Theresa May and they will tell you the big savings have been made and there is scope for no more.

Speaking Sunday at a press conference detailing the report, the head of the 27 - member commission, former New York Chief Justice Jonathan Lippman, excoriated Rikers Island as a «penal colony» physically and psychologically remote from the city at large that does far more harm than good to anyone who ends up there.

There have been people involved with his administration that I've talked with and others may have spoken to, but I don't know of the mayor personally speaking to anyone.

For anyone concerned, there is always the option to speak to a specialist support team member.

Make no mistake, this is advocacy cinema; interviews with Defense Department and military officials notwithstanding, there's not much effort, on Dick's part or anyone else's, to consider any point of view besides the victims» and those who love or speak for them.

• Judi Dench is right that there is huge variation in actors» speaking abilities but rather than trying to quash the variations, I'd recommend anyone challenged by the choices of creatives and technicians to turn to subtitles or captions.

The few dozen kindly souls who live there raise livestock, cavort happily in the fields, and speak an American dialect that will be familiar to anyone who has watched fourth - graders put on a Thanksgiving play.

Suffice it to say that Mr. Traub neither visited the school nor spoke with anyone who works there.

Is he going to explain why he and my mother have no close friends, why they've never had anyone over to the house, why they never speak of any relatives in Haiti or anywhere else, or have never returned there or, even after I learned Creole from them, have never taught me anything else about the country beyond what I could find out on my own, on the television, in newspapers, in books?

When Trafford Canada was bought by Author Solutions in 2009, it all changed, and I've had bad experiences ever since, mostly due to constant staff turnover (anyone who was competent appears to have left), and outsourced customer service reps who don't speak English very well and bounce your issue around to numerous reps.. There is no «person» you can ever speak to unless you have back door numbers.

There would be no was to speak with anyone about this because the change is driven by software and software does not speak with human beings.

There has been copious problems with the PSN store on the PS3 for a very long time and it continues to get worse, but no one is speaking up about it, nor is anyone at PS support admitting to the problem.

While I never like to speak in absolutes, I simply can't imagine there ever being anyone who will make us smile and laugh like Robin Williams did...

A famous writer once told me that «if you're going to be professional, there needs to be some accommodation of the people you're speaking to; you can't be completely self absorbed or self indulgent and expect anyone to «get you».

Anyone who has been dragged into a discussion of GW knows that if you don't agree, you aren't allowed to speak, the discussion shuts down since you are not «open» to the «truth» there is no point in continuing.

There's probably an interesting story to be told about why scientific reality has generally triumphed at website that can be edited by anyone who speaks English, when it's a much closer question among English - speakers in general.

The facts speak for themselves; there is no need for anyone to manipulate them.»