While
speaking about religion there is a marvelous expression, which says, «Who knows one, knows none,» this expression greatly describes the aim of comparative religions essays writing.
Speaking about religion and science, I may have a very unconventional background.
But I suspect Seneca was
speaking about religion in general, including, although perhaps not specifically, Christianity.
Yet we can only speak in succession of what appears in contemporaneousness; in discourse we must abstract relations, such as love, from the terms related and the terms from each other, so that we are always in danger of speaking of God without reference to the being he loves and that loves him; of
speaking about religion or love of God as distinct from ethics or the love of neighbor.
Some say President Obama sounds like an evangelical when
he speaks about his religion, echoing the famous evangelist Billy Graham.
The result was a split that forced the theological reformers back onto faith presuppositions whenever
they spoke about religion, and onto an increasing reliance on naturalistic approaches to the sensible world whenever they wanted to speak about ethics, science, or knowledge in general.
Though his film is an eloquent testimony to the power of a nun's religious faith, he himself is hesitant to
speak about religion as anything more than an offshoot of secular morality.
He rarely
spoke about his religion, but his Freemasonry experience points to a belief in deism.»
In re-reading my post, I noticed that I did not single out christianity —
I spoke about religion.
It speaks about religion or spirituality, and how a young man copes in the middle of the ocean with a Bengal tiger, shipwrecked for almost a year.
Not exact matches
So when you're scared of Muslim or Islam, just go upto your Muslim neighbor, your Muslim coworker or just walk into a mosque and
speak with Americans who
speak the same language, drinks the same coffee and watches the same Simpson and tell them «Hey, I'm scared of you / your
religion, and I don't want to be, so tell me
about your
religion and why I should NOT be scared of you just because you're a Muslim.»
Her superficial acquaintance with the
religions she is
speaking about is disappointing.
You know nothing
about Pope Francis or the Jesuits, yet you
speak and blast every
religion.
Speaking the truth
about the stupidity of
religion is not bigotry.
However, your fantasy - based
religion does exist, and those of us who actually care
about the future of this country have every right to
speak out against it being used in public policy.
So you're too stupid to give some examples on a belief blog that focuses on
religion and people who are religious and that they
speak about god to give me alternatives to different terms?
What, this «great
religion» whos followers NEVER seem to
speak up
about the attrocities against humanity that the
religion encourages?
It is also really only dangerous, fundamentalist
religion about which I was
speaking at the end, the harm that it has done and continues to do, and it's decline, revival etc..
If he wants to Portray and peace ful immigage of Islam and that of Prophet Muhammad then that ok but be careful
about the words he chooses when
speaking about Prophet of any
religion let alone the most beloved to GOD.
I
speak out against your ilk and any other group for that matter when they attempt t use their belief to dictate rights... LGBT rights; women's rights; education rights (in a secular country, no single
religion has a place in the school system - teach
about one, teach them all - fair is fair).
So many people who advocate or
speak publicly for political or personal reasons aren't acknowledged as much when it comes to
religion when someone is wanting to
speak out
about there faith a light bulb goes off and says we don't want to hear, or talk, or, air any thing that has to do with the mentioning of God but because of the high profile story and because this is the President of the United States it's ok hats off to them for not being ashamed to
speak about there faith I agree with Richard some people just because they profess there faith doesn't mean there trying to push there beliefs on anyone people of faith have a right to free speech also.
I'm not a Christian who brags
about a
religion that doesn't believe in rewards for being good or punishment for being bad since I can just pass the buck to someone who died 2,00 o years ago, so I can't
speak for them.
and if you find me to be wrong then that your opioion but the only thing is disgusting is you by the way you think and
speak, by your ignorance and not educated yourself to know what islamic aka muslim
religion is
about?
Listen to James Madison
speak about the need for the need to keep
religion out of government (Jefferson wasn't the only one to explicitly
speak of the separation of church and state):
Spoke - tell that to the majority of Christians who are quick to hate Muslims and other
religions... tell that to the Christians who still falsely believe that America was founded on Christianity — tell that to allthe Christians who are still in denial
about Pedophile running around in the Catholic church — Christians are as silly as they come
I see so CNN feels the need for yet another attack on Christianity... Why doesn't CNN
speak about other
religions?
I was at college today and
spoke to a hip but conservative theology professor mostly
about post-modern
religion, after chapel.
No it has not been proven where did you see that on an alien special on a & e, Read up on it those other
religions did not have Jesus as a Savior and did not have men writing 1000s of years apart talking
about the same events, and phrophecizing
about things that happened in later chapters written hundreds of years later... and in no bok any where was there a man like Jesus, who
spoke the words that Jesus
spoke and died for people who hated Him like Jesus did, and
spoke the parabales and life lessons like Jesus did... look at what Jesus
spoke... read it nowhere has there been a better teacher of life then in His words.
I said they took part in the horrors while preaching tolerence, caring, loving, comp@ssion towards other... you know, all the stuff jesus
spoke about...
religion is no better then anything but it canbe used however.
You said, «Yesterday I had to side with a Christian who said most of the atheists here may be called hatheists because of the way they
speak about anothers
religion.»
Speaking personally, it means the grievous loss of something
about Catholic observance which always used enormously to impress me as a non-Catholic: the spectacle of Catholics keeping their weekday obligations, often at enormous inconvenience to themselves: as an Anglican, for whom any liturgical obligation was essentially a matter of my own whim, this was immensely attractive: there was the sense that Catholics were under obedience, and that their
religion was a real force in their lives, one not to be diverted by secular pressures or values.
In his view,
religion that
speaks about ultimate truths in public is a species of the «enthusiasm» that he feared and despised.
From her work as a
religion editor at Publishers Weekly, to her expansive writing and lecturing career, to her The Divine Hours series, Phyllis has a remarkable ability to
speak wisely and prophetically
about the future of Christianity while remaining joyfully rooted in its past.
Chine is of Nigerian descent and has a passion for reporting
religion's impact on society, as well as writing and
speaking about faith, race and gender.
I've always enjoyed your ability to openly
speak about this figurehead of
religion.
oh, so like pretty much all religious people you have the audacity and hubris to
speak disparagingly
about what other people * think * their
religion is supposed to be
about, implying that, apparently, you and only you have all the real answers.
the bible talks
about the
religion of man, verses that of christ, he has not the holy spirit, chris made it very clear who enters heaven, he also said you are either for me or against me, man can not serve two masters, you may know how to read the bible, but without the holy spirit, the truth is hidden from you, they have a form of godlyness, but are without the spirit, they
speak wonderful words, but the truth is not in them, many will flock to the anti christ, Obama shows how easy it will be for satan to decieve the world, the bible has a lot to say
about the end times, and we are in that area.
Writer should have
spoken about the seven commandments of Noach Sons: Another difference between
religions is that Islam and Cristianity are universal — wants every one to join them (or else...) but Judaism doesn't want others to join — just requires all humanity to follow 7 lows.
The President goes to church but because the First Amendment says that the state can not favor one
religion above the others, chooses not to
speak about his faith while in office.
There are parallels in other
religions the like Egyptian and Hindu — Horus and Krishna each as the son of god at the time they were written and
spoken about.
Making «control» more important than love or social justice
speaks volumes
about the leaders of this
religion.
It's
about time someone
spoke out against organized
religion.
I cant
speak much for the other
Religions, but one can say the same
about them as well... Buddhism for example... while their temples can be seen as less grandiose in the native locations, in the West they become Statements of what MAN can do to show - off, and not what man can do to seek the Divine.
It is as if there is almost three tiers of
religion M. Scott Peck
speaks about this in some of his writings, the bottom tier are those who blindly accept, the middle level is composed of those who came to reject the things they accepted blindly, and the final tier of enlightenment is those who have gone through all the hard questions, accepting nothing blindly, yet eventually find God.
Yeah yeah, you can say that
religion is the way to truth but, logically
speaking, believing in a god is the incorrect conclusion to reach based on what we know
about religion in general and the incompatability between the
religion and the real world.
Unbelievable, some of them
speak of finding the truth but spout vial lies and the COMMON misconceptions of a
religion that they obviously have no, I mean NO, idea what they are talking
about.
The equality tribunal agreed with Mr McAteer that his
religion required him to share the gospel and
speak about Jesus with other people.
Eating the flesh and drinking the blood have overtones of the Lord's Supper, and many scholars have tried to point out in these words the influence of the mystery
religions, which often
spoke about eating the body of the dying and rising savior god.
He
spoke of the prestige of science in our culture and the corresponding lack of respect for
religion («If it's a science programme it's a documentary, if the subject's politics there's a debate, but a religious programme, unless it's hymns for granny, will have people talking
about their feelings»).
What is it
about this thing we «our
religion'that is often (not always) a breeding ground for incompatibility, to
speak kindly, or more honestly, violent contempt for those who dare to differ in their understanding of the «faith»?