She is
speaking from ignorance and has no idea what she is saying.
Of course... and I'm
speaking from ignorance here... why do they want American music?
Ratzinger was in charge of the CDF at the Vatican when many of these cases were dealt with, watch the docu * mentary you will learn enough so that you will not have to
speak from ignorance.
Mt 7:13 - 14 I am convinced this young woman
speaks from ignorance of her «faith.»
You speak from ignorance and obviously know nothing about atheists - though you're probably surrounded by them without even knowing it because they don't feel like battling with the ignorant.
or just
speak from ignorance as a hobby.
All those who nay - say the Lord and
speak from ignorance of the One true God will one day KNOW He is who He says He is as ALL will face Him in judgment.
When
you speak from ignorance it just makes you appear ignorant.
«My impression is that those who attack boxing
speak from ignorance,» he says.
And individuals such as Warren Farrell, and Karen DeCrow, who
speak from the ignorance of never even having their own children, let alone having any expertise in child psychology, or divorce, are unimpressive as sources.
Not exact matches
Then this
from Augustine: «There is therefore in us a certain learned
ignorance (docta ignorantia), so to
speak.»
Anyone who makes the assertion that scripture is clear is
speaking either
from ignorance or desired outcome rather than evidence.
In fact, you're
speaking from a base of complete
ignorance just to display a bunch of prejudices.
I
speak from experience — even when you're reacting negatively out of
ignorance, it is going to affect your child.
This image, at once surrealist and satirical,
speaks volumes of the contemporary Broadway theater's distance
from its noble legacy and the infuriating but optimistic
ignorance of the generation now awash on its shores.
The argument with a friend still rattles me today, but I'm glad it happened, because it was a clear reminder that we all have a moral obligation to learn the facts and then
speak from knowledge, not
from ignorance, fear, or unanswerable beliefs.
I'm
speaking from vast
ignorance, here, just wondering about some of the undercurrents in the decision to axe his team.And what a godawful waste of money all those giant simulations have been.
My response was something like «Well, I certainly would not want Mr. Will to be
speaking from a viewpoint of
ignorance.»
I was at a dinner a couple weeks back at which several journalists
spoke on just this issue, and Shankar Vedantam and Chris Mooney made a good case for what I have also suggested (including in my reply to you on April 6); What's really irrational is for smart people, in support of the myth of perfect rationality and frustrated by the public's «
ignorance» about risk, to ignore the mountains of evidence
from neuroscience and social sciences about how human perception and decision - making actually works, about risk or anything else.
I'm
speaking (as I so often do)
from ignorance here, but this really seems not to be an apples - to - apples comparison.
Likewise, every attorney that complains about a piece of technology would be assumed to not be
speaking from a place of
ignorance, but rather to be giving an informed analysis of a tool.
Use only metaphorical language, analogy and general management -
speak to disguise
ignorance and avoid specific challenge, draw all examples for intended actions
from unrelated industry sectors so that everyone is ignorant in equal amounts, set up project teams to investigate issues but never complete tasks, when in trouble, announce an internal restructure to buy more time and get out quickly, on to the next job before being rumbled.