This curve is statistically
speaking a «random walk», with no robust statistical correlation with atmospheric CO2, which has seen no cycles but has increased at a fairly constant CAGR
of around 0.4 % per year since measurements started at Mauna Loa in 1958 and at an estimated somewhat slower rate before this, based on
ice core data.
The reason I think this simple «nature is driving climate» reason needs to be considered is simply the
ice core data from both Greenland and Antarctica that gives a near term (geologically speaking) view of the Earth's temps over the last number of Ice ag
ice core data from both Greenland and Antarctica that gives a near term (geologically
speaking) view
of the Earth's temps over the last number
of Ice ag
Ice ages.