Broadly
speaking people think austerity is necessary if disagreeable.
This word does not mean «forgiveness» in the way that modern, English -
speaking people think about forgiveness.
Not exact matches
I
thought about how much Americans value democracy and having their voices heard, yet I was perplexed that so few
people were
speaking out.
Some
people think that marketing is completely sales, and if one were to
speak to an insurance salesman at a networking event, they would probably agree.
Speaking about himself, Levy says, «I
think the only
people who would probably embarrass themselves more over time are
people who are far, far, far more successful.
«I
think it just
speaks to who he is as a
person and how he comes out here and just fights each and every night, even when adversity is against him,» Celtics forward Jae Crowder said, via ESPN's Chris Forsberg.
You can begin to
think about, «OK, what is something different that I could provide this
person that would make it worth their time to
speak with me or meet with me?»»
«We build world - class tech that puts
people back in control of their finances, we
speak to our customers like humans and we're never afraid to challenge old
thinking in order to innovate.»
I
think what is most important for us is to start making it a daily habit,» he said,
speaking of
people using ambient - computing and voice - activated systems.
Through a series of experiments, researchers from the University of Chicago's Booth School of Business and the University of California, Berkeley discovered that
spoken language most clearly reveals a
person's
thinking ability.
«Be wary of the fact that how a
person treats or
speaks about someone else could potentially translate into the way they will treat you in the future,»
Thought Catalog cautions.
Faced with a room of
people, would you run into that room and try to
speak to everyone, force your
thoughts on them and get in their faces?
Confident
people are more successful because they seize opportunities and do things insecure
people think of as scary (
think public
speaking).
However, I will only
speak these crazy
thoughts to 1)
people that are energized by them, or 2)
people that can help me execute them.
Few
people Adam Goldstein or Steve Huffman
spoke with before launch
thought there was a problem with how they searched for flights.
The idea would be to teach
people how to become
thought leaders and get paid to
speak, get into publications, build their personal brands, and grow their careers and / or businesses while doing it.
It's about
speaking to the
people who really
think they're not interested and getting them to fall in love with Amy Winehouse.»
Still, it didn't take much prodding to get dozens of
people of all generations to email me and let me know what
speaking habits they
think Millennials need to stop using now — at least at work.
You might
think that the average age of the
people you're
speaking to is 45 - 54, only to look at your analytics and uncover that 25 - 34 is the most dominant age group.
(Or in nonresearcher
speak, when you
think other
people will like you, you act more naturally and come across as friendlier — which then makes
people like you more since we tend to like warm, friendly
people.)
The perks make
people more inclined to
think big - picture, and to
speak up when they get a great idea.
In Stephen Covey's bestseller The 7 Habits of Highly Effective
People, he
speaks of how choice resides within the gap between stimulus and response, and how being responsible for one's actions is more a matter of being response - able, or choosing the
thought that will guide your behavior.
WHEN south eastern South Australia is
spoken of in wine terms,
people tend to immediately
think cold, cold Coonawarra, the birthplace of some of Australia's finest cabernet sauvignon reds.
Turney Duff
spoke to over 100
people on Wall Street to find out what they really
think about Trump's immigration ban.
Henke recommended that leaders should «
think about how your
people explain their culture when hiring, not the brand
speak, the «Why do I work here?»
When you
speak of the programs and
people that will be impacted, instead
think of the reduction in cancer, the increase in marine life, the removal of plastics from the bottled water being sold... the list goes on.
Ray Dalio makes the business case for using radical transparency and algorithmic decision - making to create an idea meritocracy where
people can
speak up and say what they really
think — even calling out the boss is fair game.
I
think what I'm getting at is this: Imagine 100 like - minded
people (each with an obvious right to free speech) band together to
speak on electoral politics.
The
people that experience breakthroughs in the game of listening - and -
speaking, will «park» all their
thoughts, remove the internal clutter and noise from their heads, and engage the other
person with complete, distraction - free, attention.
«A big chill came across Silicon Valley in the wake of all these stories, and
people are hyperaware and scared of behaving wrongly, so I
think they're drawing all kinds of parameters,» said a venture capitalist who
spoke anonymously for the same reason.
«When you publish a book,
people think you're an expert,» Miles says, «so you start getting invited to
speak.»
Think of the Daniels - versus - Trump legal battle as, so far, a three - month - long epic saga set in 2018 in, partly, Washington, D.C. — a hard town full of hard
people (and a smutty sheriff, so to
speak).
People thought it would take years to become relevant; I remember a man coming up to me after I
spoke about cryptocurrency and telling me that my talk would be interesting in a decade.
But in a garden variety bear market, say 25 % or something thereabouts, I
think people with balanced portfolios, generally
speaking, will do okay.
We build world class tech that puts
people back in control of their finances, we
speak to our customers like humans and we're never afraid to challenge old
thinking in order to innovate.»
The concept, which does not include any
spoken words, «was just very direct and honest and we
think people respond really well to that.»
«He basically would wait to
think about something before
speaking,» one
person who worked with him told Recode.
But the next time you see a gay or lesbian
person and
think to yourself, «They are sinful, they are lost, they are wrong, or they are an abomination...» understand that you may very well be
speaking about your own partner, your own child, your own parent or brother or sister... and you don't even know it yet!
It is about time leaders of Faith,
speak out and call on their
people to follow the teachings of Christ, not just mouth the words, but live them... I know more non Catholics that are
thinking of converting than I have heard ever....
Of course some religious groups and
persons like that will also mock, but they
speak from places of personal interest, and so what they
think doesn't matter, we all know where those opinions originate.
So, by your reasoning, if «
People put so much importance on words» (implying that they don't matter and we shouldn't take
thought of how we use them) then I ought to be able to sing along with the lyrics from pac's «hit»em up» with my black friends, curse in a kindergarten class as well as a corporate meeting for my boss... what impression would a client have of my boss if I were cussing in a professional meeting or at a charity event... it doesn't add up, it's a cop - out rebuttal... trying to find loopholes or applying «human reasoning» like» ll take a swearing guy who's helpful» doesn't change Jesus or scripture it's just setting up a what - if scenario and trying to allow that to in some way justify your stance when again, that doesn't change The Holy Spirit or His heart in those who have been born again... the verses (inspired by His own Spirit)
speak for themselves.
I attended a church with «gags,» and what struck me the most after leaving it was that the
people still there
thought that
speaking «gag language» was normal.
But I
think that CFA's successes are
speaking volumes as to what
people really
think.
He
thought: pious
people, I suppose, would call this the devil
speaking, but he knew that... this was innocence.
I
think one thing that would help this debate is to realize that the Bible doesn't
speak of eternal hell where terrible
people are consigned to simply because they do bad things and reject Jesus.
Speaking to Premier, Dr Steve Laureys (above), who led the research, said: «I don't
think we can question what
people experience.
That should
speak volumes to its If you take one moment and give consideration to this one
thought — If Jesus Christ is not real, why are
people offended by His name?
And just so you know, the fact that more and more
people like you feel the need to
speak up with your hatred of all things biblical or Christian, makes
people like me very happy because it tells us that the very book, the Bible, that you diss, is absolutely right because it has been warning us for hundreds of years that
thoughts like yours will increase.
Speaking to Premier, Laura Hancock, who put the report together, said: «Initially that feels discouraging but if you
think of it as one in six of the
people you know - that's a good start.»
Your words, Mark, at the prayer breakfast were 100 % correct: we do have a responsibility to God to do the best we can do... to make good come of heartache... I challenge
people reading this to
think of and remember the fact that we are AMERICANS and this nation was founded on the very principles of which Mark
spoke: a responsibility within ourselves to our Creator to rise to the occasion and make things better... May we all find that courage to do so!