Sentences with phrase «special courts generally»

Not exact matches

Generally, the law requires a person paying child support to make those payments until (1) your child is no longer a minor, unless the child has special needs; (2) the child becomes active - duty military; (3) your parental rights are terminated through adoption or another legal process, or (4) your minor child is declared «emancipated» by a court — that is, declared an adult earlier than normal because of the ability to be self - supporting.

Hoppy's lawyer, prominent Manhattan divorce attorney Bernard Clair — speaking generally and not specifically about the Frankel divorce — said the special treatment leads some high - profile clients to believe that the «court system is somewhere between their private secretary and their private chef.»

Although student loans are generally exempt from bankruptcy proceedings, there are special circumstances under which you can appeal a court to discharge the debt.

Occasionally, expert witnesses or special circumstances may warrant additional pages, however in the interests of the court, requests for longer declarations are generally not granted.

An individual who has incorporated or the members of a partnership can thus be sued and require a lawyer or bringing a motion and having «special circumstances» before they can represent their interests (Special circumstances generally being impecuniosity, or the ability to convince the court that the potential representative has sufficient training and experience to act as cspecial circumstances» before they can represent their interests (Special circumstances generally being impecuniosity, or the ability to convince the court that the potential representative has sufficient training and experience to act as cSpecial circumstances generally being impecuniosity, or the ability to convince the court that the potential representative has sufficient training and experience to act as counsel.

Generally the Court will uphold amounts agreed to that are outside of these government guidelines if it is satisfied that «special» provisions have otherwise been made to benefit the child and that the application of the regular guidelines would be unfair given special provisions.

Generally, Ontario courts have determined that when an employee utilizes a special skill in their employment they may deserve a greater notice period than another employee who does not despite the fact that both employees had the same or similar length of service with the employer.

However, the Strasbourg court is the definitive arbiter of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention) and the generally accepted position has been that «[w] hile the case law of the Strasbourg court is not strictly binding... domestic courts and tribunals should, in the absence of special circumstances, follow the clear and constant jurisprudence of that court» (Huang v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2007] UKHL 11).

[362] The court further noted that the disciplinary process against Dr. Wang changed; it evolved from a code of conduct committee investigating a particular complaint relating to specific confidentiality issues to a special committee generally investigating, without a complaint, the conduct of Dr. Wang in her capacity as director and officer.