Sentences with phrase «special education expenditures from»

June 6, 2014 ACLU of California and Public Advocates contacted then - Superintendent John Deasy requesting that the district remove the $ 450 million in special education expenditures from its estimate of services for high - need students to comply with the statute and regulations.

Not exact matches

According to Rothstein, from 1967 to 2005 the share of educational expenditures going to regular education dropped from 80 to 55 percent and the share going to special education increased from 4 to 21 percent.

State will pay 90 percent of the share of districts» costs for special - education students that exceed regular per - pupil expenditures, up from 82 percent.

Note: Table reports expenditures from all funds (General, State Special Education, Combined GF & Special Education, Total Governmental, Total State Grants, and Total Federal Grants); Statewide totals include expenditures from public charter schools Variable costs include expenditures for Instruction, Student / Instruction Support Services, Other Support Services, and Fringe Benefits; They exclude Operational Expenses, Total Property Expenses, Assets / Reserves, Debt Service, Transfers, and other miscellaneous expenses

The type of ADA used is annual district ADA (for the same year as the expenditures) from CDE's «Attendance School District» and «Attendance Charter School» reports and includes ADA from special education programs and applicable charter schools (i.e., those charter schools with data in the district's Current Expense of Education calceducation programs and applicable charter schools (i.e., those charter schools with data in the district's Current Expense of Education calcEducation calculation).

For the prekindergarten program alone, they identified $ 92,220 in present value benefits and $ 8,512 in present value costs in 2007 dollars — a benefit - cost ratio of 10.83 to 1.22 The benefits derived mainly from reduced public education expenditures due to lower grade retention and use of special education, reduced costs to the criminal justice system and victims of crime due to lower crime rates, reduced expenditures on child welfare due to less child abuse and neglect, higher projected earnings of center participants, and increased income tax revenue due to projected higher lifetime earnings of center participants.